Case law

Duncan v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

124 Or. App. 675 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1993

Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993).

Bennett v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

125 Or. App. 512 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 1993

Petitioner argues that the Board failed to assess correctly his matrix range before deciding whether or not to uphold the minimum sentences. See Calderon-Pacheco v. … Board of Parole, 309 Or 454 , 788 P2d 1001 (1991); Howard v. Board of Parole, 105 Or App 288 , 804 P2d 509 , rev den 311 Or 432 (1991). We affirm.

Cornell v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

125 Or. App. 287 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 1993

Glasser v. Board of Parole, 123 Or App 610 , 860 P2d 832 (1993); Jeldness v. Board of Parole, 92 Or App 323 , 759 P2d 1102 (1988).

Newcomb v. Board of Parole

333 Or. App. 660 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 2024

NEWCOMB, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. … Because he did not provide the board an opportunity to address the argument he makes on appeal, he neither pre- served it for review nor exhausted his administrative reme- dies. ORAP 5.45(1); Tuckenberry v.

Allen v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

124 Or. App. 430 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 3, 1993

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision order that set his parole release date. ORS 144.335. … In Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993), we decided the issues presented by petitioner contrary to his position, holding that the Board may deny petitioner access to certain information.

Catlin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

127 Or. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 1994

Finally, petitioner contends that the Board violated the requirement of ORS 144.135 that the Board give “detailed bases” of its decisions, including those made under ORS 144.122. He suggests that Anderson v. … ORS 144.035 provides, in part: “(1) In hearings conducted by the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, the board may sit together or in panels. “(2) Panels may consist of one or two board members * *

Polk v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

124 Or. App. 674 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1993

Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993).

Dewitt v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

124 Or. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 3, 1993

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision order that deferred his parole release date for 18 months after he violated his parole. ORS 144.335. … Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993). Petitioner’s other arguments do not require discussion. Affirmed.

Rural Dell School District v. Board of Education

97 Or. App. 31 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 1989

See Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). A provision that simply permits an “appeal” says little, if anything, about the scope of appellate review. … This case is different from Kumley v. Polk Co. Dist.

Kesler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

124 Or. App. 676 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1993

Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993).

Rucker v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

123 Or. App. 639 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

Glasser v. Board of Parole, 123 Or App 610 , 860 P2d 832 (1993).

Reese v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

123 Or. App. 641 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

Glasser v. Board of Parole, 123 Or App 610 , 860 P2d 832 (1993).

Twitty v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

123 Or. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

Glasser v. Board of Parole, 123 Or App 610 , 860 P2d 832 (1993).

McKenzie v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

115 Or. App. 707 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 21, 1992

At the outset, the Board argues that the order is not a final order, because it does not change the 12-month term of supervision imposed on petitioner’s 1989 convictions. It relies on Willaby v. … Howard v. State Board of Parole, 105 Or App 288, 292 , 804 P2d 509 , rev den 311 Or 432 (1991). The Board imposed, a 12-month parole term in response to a parole violation.

Bushnell v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

116 Or. App. 530 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 25, 1992

She relies solely on State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434 , 806 P2d 130 , rev dismissed 312 Or 76 , 815 P2d 701 (1991), in which we held that the phrase “scheme or network” is unconstitutionally vague. … Even assuming that the constitutional void-for-vagueness principle is applicable to the Board’s rules, 2 compare Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293, 299 , 605 P2d 273 (1980), with Williams v.

Forelaws on Board v. Energy Facility Siting Council

311 Or. 350 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 14, 1991

In Forelaws on Board v. … Forelaws on Board v. Energy Facility Siting Coun., 84 Or App 433 , 734 P2d 370 (1987). The merits of that court’s decision are not before us.

LaTulippe v. Oregon Medical Board

325 Or. App. 424 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2023

M. v. … The board is cor- rect that, because it revoked petitioner’s license on multiple independent grounds, its order must be affirmed. See Roop v.

Pulito v. Or. State Bd. of Nursing

365 Or. 192 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 2019

Oregon Liquor Control Commission v. Employment Relations Board

52 Or. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 1981

OLCC relies on our holdings in Thompson v. … In Brown v. Oregon College of Education, 52 Or App 251 , 628 P2d 410 (1981), we held that, in reviewing agency disciplinary actions, ERB is to find as a fact whether a reasonable employer would have taken the action.

Scenic Sites, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

33 Or. App. 199 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 13, 1978

Damascus Comm. *203 Church v. Clackamas Co., 32 Or App 3 , 573 P2d 726 (1978). … Columbia County v. O’Black, 16 Or App 147 , 517 P2d 688 , rev den (1974).