Case law

District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. Broadus

560 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1989

Jones v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, 375 A.2d 1, 5 (D.C.1977). … Saah v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 433 A.2d 1114, 1116 (D.C.1981). We examine the record accordingly. III.

United Steelworkers v. National Labor Relations Board

405 F.2d 1373 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 5, 1968

The Board has broad discretion to formulate remedies, Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. … V The union petitions for review of the Board’s order on three points.

Gage v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

738 A.2d 1219 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1999

See D.C.Code § l-1510(b) (1992 Repl.); Robinson v. Smith, 683 A.2d 481, 490 (D.C.1996). Petitioners filed a subsequent motion to reconsider which the Board granted. … We concur in this conclusion, and find no error in the Board’s determination that petitioners failed to satisfy their burden of proof. Cf. Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Arcade-Sunshine Co.

132 F.2d 8 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 19, 1942

The master’s report will be confirmed, the order to show cause discharged, and the Board’s petition denied. National Labor Relations Board v. Arcade-Sunshine Co., Inc., 73 App.D.C. 128 , 118 F.2d 49 . … National Labor Relations Board v. Arcade-Sunshine Co., Inc., 74 App.D.C. 361 , 122 F.2d 964 .

Parts Depot, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

24 F. App'x 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2001

Based on its findings, the Board determined that a Category II bargaining order *2 was justified under NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969). … The bargaining order remedy imposed by the Board was therefore fully justified.

Greer v. Board of Trustees University of District of Columbia

113 F. Supp. 3d 297 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 2015

) Civil Action No. 13-cv-1728 (TSC) ) BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ) UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Fortuna Enterprises, LP v. National Labor Relations Board

665 F.3d 1295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 9, 2011

See, e.g., NLRB v. … Sierra Realty Corp. v. NLRB, 82 F.3d 494, 495 (D.C. Cir. 1996); see NLRB v. Transp. Mgmt.

In Re Ponds

888 A.2d 234 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 2005

We also considered delay as a mitigating factor in In re Brown, 851 A.2d 1278 (D.C.2004). The Board recommended that Brown be suspended for one year with a fitness requirement for reinstatement. Id. at 1279 . … Neither Brown nor Bar Counsel filed objections or exceptions to the Board’s report. 32 Id. at 1279 . We concluded that the recommendation of the Board should be adopted. Id.

Vermont Public Service Board v. Federal Communications Commission

661 F.3d 54 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 18, 2011

In 2003, following litigation in the Tenth Circuit not directly relevant here, Qwest Corp. v. … Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 18 FCC Rcd. 22559, 22583 ¶ 39.

North Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

281 F.2d 18 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 12, 1960

281 F.2d 18 NORTH CENTRAL AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, State of Wisconsin, City of Marshfield, Wisconsin, City of Ashland, Wisconsin, Ozark Air Lines, Inc., Intervenors. No. 14947. … United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 7 Cir., 198 F.2d 100, 105, 106 ; Western Air Lines v.

Beckman v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

810 A.2d 377 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 2002

Britton v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters’ Retirement Bd., 681 A.2d 1152, 1155 (D.C.1996) (citing DiVincenzo v. … Baumgartner v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Bd., 527 A.2d 313, 315 (D.C.1987) (citing Johnson v.

Gebremariam v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board

533 A.2d 909 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1987

The Board was authorized to suspend or revoke a license for a violation of § 819, with which petitioner was charged. 15 DCMR § 801.1 (1987); Pillis v. … The Board’s decision must be affirmed on appeal if it is supported by substantial evidence. Jones v. District of Columbia Hackers’ License Appeal Board, 455 A.2d 896, 897 (D.C.1983).

Carroll College, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

558 F.3d 568 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 13, 2009

In this petition for review, the college argues that its religious educational environment and affiliation with the United Presbyterian Church place it beyond the Board’s jurisdiction under NLRB v. … Workers, AFL-CIO v. NLRB, 727 F.2d 1184, 1191 n.5 (D.C. Cir. 1984); see also NLRB v. Cheney Cal. Lumber Co., 327 U.S. 385, 388 (1946); Noel Foods v. NLRB, 82 F.3d 1113, 1121 (D.C.

Flamingo Hilton-Laughlin v. National Labor Relations Board

148 F.3d 1166 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 1998

In NLRB v. … Co. v.

Craig v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

721 A.2d 584 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1998

See Red Star Express v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 606 A.2d 161, 163 (D.C.1992) (citation omitted); Washington Press Club v. … V.

Building Material v. National Labor Relations Board

669 F.2d 759 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 4, 1981

Camera Corp. v. … To successfully attack the Board’s remedy one must show that the remedies prescribed by the Board are clearly inadequate in the light of the findings of the Board. I.U.E., Local 806 v.

Civil Aeronautics Board v. American Air Transport, Inc.

201 F.2d 189 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 20, 1952

201 F.2d 189 CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD et al. v. AMERICAN AIR TRANSPORT, Inc., et al. No. 11115. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued February 15, 1952. … V 34 Immediately after this Opinion had been promulgated, the Board on June 5, 1950, announced its intention to adopt the Regulation here complained of, quoted in major part in the findings of the District Court above set

H. B. Roberts v. National Labor Relations Board

350 F.2d 427 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 21, 1965

ROBERTS, Business Manager of Local 925, International Union of Operating Engineers, and Local 925, International Union of Operating Engineers, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 18942. … Also see, the National Labor Relations Board, Rules and Regulations Series 8, as amended, Section 102.9. 14 7. Hercules Powder Co. v. N. L. R.

BNSF Railway Co. v. Surface Transportation Board

748 F.3d 1295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 23, 2014

BNSF Railway Co. v. STB, 526 F.3d 770, 776-77 (D.C. Cir. 2008). … See Western Resources, Inc. v. STB, 109 F.3d 782, 789 (D.C.

King v. Dole

595 F. Supp. 1140 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 1984

In Brown v. … Brown v. Nat'l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 673 F.2d 544, 546 (D.C. Cir.1982).