Case law

Scott v. McDonald

789 F.3d 1375 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jun 18, 2015

Scott responded to the RO on December 13, 2007, reiterat- ing his request for a hearing and informing the Board SCOTT v. … A review of Scott’s pleadings to the Board confirms that Scott did not raise the hearing issue in his current appeal to the Board. The regulations do not require that SCOTT v.

Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n

804 F.2d 1487 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 26, 1986

Code Cong. & Ad.News at 6086-87, 6298; see Roach, 660 F.2d at 1318 ; Brown v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union (In re Brown) 49 B.R. 558, 561 (Bankr.M.D.Penn.1985). … See Brown, 49 B.R. at 561 (letter from credit union to debtor violated automatic stay when sent directly to debtor rather than to his attorney).

Miller v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 18-0011

278 Neb. 1018 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Dec 4, 2009

Board of Governors, 204 Neb. 383 , 281 N.W.2d 925 (1979). [10] See, Moser v. Board of Education, 204 Neb. 561 , 283 N.W.2d 391 (1979); Witt v. School District No. 70, 202 Neb. 63 , 273 N.W.2d 669 (1979). [11] Roth v. … No. 0001, supra note 4, 265 Neb. at 747 , 658 N.W.2d at 927 , quoting Trolson v. Board of Ed. of Sch. Dist. of Blair, 229 Neb. 37 , 424 N.W.2d 881 (1988). [14] Cross v. Board of Governors, supra note 9. [15] Witt v.

State v. Johnson

329 Or. App. 435 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 6, 2023

State v. Goodall, 219 Or App 325, 330, 183 P3d 199 (2008). … McCarthy, which abrogated the per se exigency rule for automobile searches. 369 Or 129, 177, 501 P3d 478 (2021) (overruling State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 721 P2d 1357 (1986)).

Cooper v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services

377 S.C. 489 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · May 5, 2008

See Hair v. … Given the Parole Board was authorized to establish these criteria, we do not believe the Parole Board changed the law in violation of the Ex Post Facto clause. See State v.

Brown v. Brown

5 Vet. App. 413 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Aug 16, 1993

Smith (Raymond) v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 335, 339 , (1993). … See Horowitz v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 217, 223 (U.S.1993).

Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings, Inc. v. Crestview-Oxbow Acquisition, LLC

202 A.3d 482 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Jan 17, 2019

Force Holdings, LLC v. … See Blish v.

Rork v. Szabo Foods

436 N.E.2d 64 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1982

Rork v. Szabo Foods, supra, at 1382. It cannot be said that it is always “obvious” that the Board has simply “placed more weight on some evidence than on another.” Id. Experience has taught us otherwise. In Talas v. … Rork v. Szabo Foods, supra, at 1381-2.

Keiter v. Keiter

659 Utah Adv. Rep. 9 · Court of Appeals of Utah · Jun 24, 2010

Pusey v. … Rehn v.

People v. Wilson

454 Mich. 421 · Michigan Supreme Court · May 28, 1997

See Brown v Ohio, 432 US 161, 169 ; 97 S Ct 2221 ; 53 L Ed 2d 187 (1977). … The people argue that the second prosecution was valid under the exception in Brown, supra at 169 .

Brown v. Brown

21 Ala. App. 1 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1924

Motion to dismiss overruled, on authority of Ex parte Brown, 213 Ala. 7 , 105 So. 170 .

Schulze v. Coykendall

218 Kan. 653 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jan 24, 1976

The complaint had been filed with the Board of Education. A public hearing was held. The board found the statements were true. … (New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, supra; Kennedy v. Mid-Continent Telecasting, Inc., supra; and Coleman v. MacLennan, supra.)

Angela Brown v. Keith Brown

Court of Appeals of Georgia · Aug 22, 2017

ANGELA BROWN v. KEITH BROWN. Upon consideration, Angela Brown’s application for discretionary appeal is hereby DENIED. … Keith Brown’s request for sanctions pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 10 is hereby DENIED.

Hickey v. Civil Serv. Comm. of Douglas Cty.

274 Neb. 554 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Nov 30, 2007

In Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 5 the U.S. … Appeals Bd., 238 Neb. 39 , 469 N.W.2d 120 (1991). 4 See Barnett v. City of Scottsbluff, supra note 3. 5 Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, supra note 1. 6 See, id.; Nebraska Pub. Emp. v.

Bissland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

162 Pa. Commw. 348 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1994

Kachinski v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Vepco Construction Co.), 516 Pa. 240 , 532 A.2d 374 (1987). … M & D Auto Body v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Pallott), 143 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 346, 599 A.2d 1016 (1991). Hendry v.

Hamel v. State

321 N.J. Super. 67 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 4, 1999

Winters v. … To the contrary, school boards are "instrumentalit[ies] of the State," Durgin v. Brown, 37 N.J. 189, 199 , 180 A.2d 136 (1962), supported not by charitable contributions, but by taxes and government aid.

Brown-Thill v. Brown

929 F. Supp. 2d 887 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Mar 8, 2013

Inc. v. … Brown cites to Tick v.

Drewrey v. Clinton

763 F. Supp. 2d 54 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2011

Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C.Cir.1985) (stating that “because untimely exhaustion of administrative remedies is an affirmative defense, the defendant bears the burden of pleading and proving it”). … Dist. v.

Alden Leeds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

812 F.3d 159 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 5, 2016

Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 377 (1998). Credibility determinations made by the ALJ, as adopted by the Board, are accepted unless they are patently insupportable. NLRB v. … Co. v. NLRB, 380 U.S. 300, 318 (1965).

Teacher Retirement System v. Badger XVI Ltd. Partnership

205 Wis. 2d 532 · Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · Oct 22, 1996

Brown v. LaChance, 165 Wis. 2d 52, 64 , 477 N.W.2d 296, 302 (Ct. App. 1991) (citation omitted). The parties need not be joint tortfeasors. Fuller v. Riedel, 159 Wis. 2d 323, 330 , 464 N.W.2d 97, 100 (Ct. … Even though not specifically denominated as such in its third-party complaint, Skidmore states indemnification claims under Brown's formulation of equitable indemnification. See Strid v.