Case law

Williams v. E.S. Boulos Co.

2000 Me. 40 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 1, 2000

See, e.g., Ibbitson v. Sheridan Corp., 422 A.2d 1005, 1008-11 (Me.1980). … See P.L.1987, ch. 559, § 17; see generally Adams v. Mt. Blue Health Ctr., 1999 ME 105, ¶ 11 , 735 A.2d 478, 480-81 .

Morey v. Maine Central Railroad

125 Me. 272 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 29, 1926

Ashton v. B. & M. R. R., supra. Murch v. … Ashton v. B. & M. R. R., supra. P. & R. Ry. v. Marland, supra. Cin., N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Thompson, 236 Fed. 1 .

Fuller v. Mower

81 Me. 380 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 1889

Skinner, then chairman of the board of selectmen of the town of St. … Tryon v. Whitmarsh, 1 Met. 1 ; Kingsbury v. Taylor, 29 Maine, 508. And very clearly .the allegations of fraud and deceit on the part of the defendant ■are not proved. Judgment for defendant. Peters, C.

Hooper v. Goodwin

48 Me. 79 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1861

H., 290; People v. Collins, 5 Johns., 549 ; Norwich v. Yarrington, 20 Vermont, 473. In People v. … Brown v. Bunt, 31 Maine, 423. His official acts are valid as to third persons, till his commission has been judicially determined to be null and void.

Barter v. Mayor of Rockland

114 Me. 466 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 8, 1916

This is a petition for a writ of certiorari, asking that certain records of the Board of Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Rockland be certified to the court, adjudged illegal and quashed. … Harkness v. Co. Commissioners, 26 Maine, 353; Parsonsfield v. Lord, 23 Maine, 516; Strong v. Commissioners, 31 Maine, 578. Petition dismissed with costs.

Reisman v. Associated Faculties of the Univ. of Me.

356 F. Supp. 3d 173 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 3, 2018

Colleges v. … In Bierman v.

State v. Darling

393 A.2d 530 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 8, 1978

Applying the principles announced in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), we sustain the State’s appeal. … Commonwealth v. Almeida, Mass., 366 N.E.2d 756, 760 (1977). Accord, State v. Brown, 160 N.J.Super. 227 , 389 A.2d 507 (1978); Brown v. State, 358 So.2d 596 (Fla.App.1978); State v.

McCarthy v. U.S.I. Corp.

678 A.2d 48 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 20, 1996

United States v. … Brae Asset Fund, L.P. v. Adam, 661 A.2d 1137, 1140 (Me.1995) (citations omitted).

United States v. Thurston

774 F. Supp. 666 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 3, 1991

In addition, at the time Sergeant Willis and Corporal Brown entered the trailer they were unsure whether the Defendant was alone. … United States v. Doe, 878 F.2d 1546, 1552 (1st Cir.1989) (quoting New York v. Quarles, 467 U.S. at 656, n. 8 , 104 S.Ct. at 2633, n. 8 ).

Grove Manufacturing Co. v. Jacobs

117 Me. 163 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 1918

But in addition- to the assortment of goods the sale included a device *164 for the distribution of the goods, called a punch board. … The construction of our statute in its application to the decision of what constitutes a gambling device has been fully declared several times in this State and recently reviewed in the case of State v.

O'HALLORAN v. Oechslie

402 A.2d 67 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 6, 1979

Littlefield v. Brown, Me., 394 A.2d 794, 797 (1978); Dehahn v. Innes, Me., 356 A.2d 711, 719 (1976). The purpose of a tender is to put the other party in violation. … See, e. g., Solberg v. Kane, 536 S.W.2d 885 (Mo. App.1976); Mezzanotte v. Freeland, supra; Freedman v. Faia, supra; Pease v. Brown, 186 Cal.App.2d 425 , 8 Cal.Rptr. 917 (1960). The entry is: Appeal denied.

Lamphier v. Bath Iron Works Corp.

2000 Me. 121 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 27, 2000

Relying on Adams v. Ml. … See Ibbitson v. Sheridan Corp., 422 A.2d 1005, 1009 (Me.1980).

Adams v. Maine Bd.of Soc. Worker Licensure

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 23, 2004

ADAMS, Petitioner v. … We now state expressly that the Act’s time limitations are jurisdictional, Brown v. State Department of Manpower Affairs, 426 A.2d 880, 887-888 (Me. 1981). The motion to dismiss must be granted.

Allen v. Hall

50 Me. 253 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1861

Ham v. Ham, 39 Maine, 216. " When the interlocutory judgment is entered,” says Merrick, J., in Brown v. … Brown v. Bulkeley, 11 Cush., 168 . The ruling of the presiding Judge, "that the objections to the report, if sustained by proof, would not invalidate it,” was correct. Bxceplions overruled. Tenney, C.

Plaisted v. Boston & Kennebec Steam Navigation Co.

27 Me. 132 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1847

Best, in Riley v. … McArthur & al. v. Sears, 21 Wend. 190 . In the case of Smith v.

State v. Dunn

370 A.2d 1099 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 2, 1977

A similar result was reached in State v. … See State v.

McKinnon v. Honeywell International, Inc.

977 A.2d 420 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 16, 2009

See Brown v. Am. Honda (In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Exp. Antitrust Litig. ), 522 F.3d 6, 22 (1st Cir. 2008). … Brown v. Am. Honda (In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Exp. Antitrust Litig.), 522 F.3d 6 , 26 & n. 27 (1st Cir.2008).

Kuhn v. State

254 A.2d 591 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 26, 1969

by subsequent action of the Board. … Shortly thereafter this Court, in Hartley v. State, Me., 249 A.2d 38 (1969), on precisely the same essential facts, decided most of the issues which this Petitioner was presenting on appeal.

Dartmouth Company v. Day's, Inc.

419 A.2d 366 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 15, 1980

Having jurisdiction under the collateral order exception to the final judgment rule, see Northeast Investment Co. v. Leisure Living Communities, Inc., Me., 351 A.2d 845, 849 (1976); Foisy v. … Brown Company as lessor and Day’s, Inc. as lessee. The answer of Day’s, Inc. denies the fact of the assignment upon information and belief.

Baston v. Robbins

153 Me. 128 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 15, 1957

By implication, at least, the Parole Board acquired authority to parole the petitioner at the expiration of the minimum term of his imprisonment. He was released by the Board on January 14, 1956. … Stroud v. Johnston, 139 F. R. (2nd) 171.