Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

2.27s

  • Wynes v. Kaiser Permanente Hospitals

    936 F. Supp. 2d 1171 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 28, 2013

    Defendants rely on Brown v. City of Tucson, 336 F.3d 1181, 1190 (9th Cir.2003), in arguing that a hostile work environment claim is not actionable under the ADA. (ECF No. 71' at 15.) … See Earl v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Lannay v. Wilson

    30 Md. 536 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 1, 1869

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Miles v. Howard University

    653 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 2016

    Allen v. Johnson, 795 F.3d 34, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (quoting Brady v. Office of Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d 490, 494 (D.C. Cir. 2008)). … See Anderson v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Matter of Brown v. Brown

    127 A.D.3d 1180 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 2015

    Eschbach, 56 NY2d at 171-172 ; Kramer v Griffith, 119 AD3d 655, 656 [2014]; Matter of Mitchell v Mitchell, 113 AD3d 775, 776 [2014]). … ; Matter of Lane v Lane, 68 AD3d 995, 997 [2009]).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Fisher v. United States

    Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Aug 12, 2025

    Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954). Wilson v. Lynaugh, 878 F.2d 846, 850-51 (5th Cir. 1989); see also Precision Air Parts v. … [Brown v. Board] overruled the separate but equal doctrine.”); Hernandez v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lauderdale County School Board v. Brown ex rel. A.B.

    106 So. 3d 807 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Jan 31, 2013

    The matter was pending before the school board, and if the board approved the recommendation, the students could request a hearing before the school board to continue the suspension until such hearing occurred. … On July 25, 2012, the youth court denied the board’s and superintendent’s motion to stay pending appeal, and the school board moved this Court to impose a stay on the underlying judgment until a final decision on the merits

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McCray v. SALAH UDDIN SHAMS, MD, SC

    224 Ill. App. 3d 999 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 10, 1992

    Shams was not board certified. … situation in Ward v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Scott v. McDonald

    789 F.3d 1375 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jun 18, 2015

    Scott responded to the RO on December 13, 2007, reiterat- ing his request for a hearing and informing the Board SCOTT v. … A review of Scott’s pleadings to the Board confirms that Scott did not raise the hearing issue in his current appeal to the Board. The regulations do not require that SCOTT v.

    Cited 385 timesPublished
  • Clarke v. Board of Appeals of Nahant

    338 Mass. 473 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 3, 1959

    See Gordon v. Guernsey, 316 Mass. 106, 108 . See also Davis & O’Connor Co. v. Shell Oil Co. Inc. 311 Mass. 401, 403 . … See Corbett v. Derman Shoe Co., ante, 405, 409.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • States Steamship Company, a Corporation v. Permanente Steamship Corporation, a Corporation

    231 F.2d 82 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 6, 1956

    As observed in Oriental Trading & Transport Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp., 2 Cir., 173 F.2d 108 , certiorari denied Gulf Oil Corp. v. M/V The John A. … Brown, 1949, 337 U.S. 919 , 69 S.Ct. 1162 , 93 L.Ed. 1728 : “The purpose of * * * all rules touching signals * * * is to advise the ship to which the signal is addressed that she can no longer rely upon the signalling ship

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    211 Ark. 241 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 10, 1947

    The statute is discussed at length in Davis v. Cullums, 205 Ark. 390 , 168 S. W. 2d 1103 . In 1932 John Oliver Brown married Martha, a widow with two sons and a daughter. … Corney v. Corney, 97 Ark. 117 , 133 S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Advance at Branchburg II, LLC v. Township Of branchburg Board of Adjustment

    433 N.J. Super. 247 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 1, 2013

    Nevertheless, we "recognize the board's knowledge of local circumstances and accord deference to its interpretation." Fallone, supra, 369 N.J. Super. at 562; accord DePetro v. … That determination will govern whether we apply the Sica or Medici standard to our review of the Board's actions. Advance relies on our decision in Homes of Hope, Inc. v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Charter Communications Holding Co. v. Dept. of Rev.

    24 Or. Tax 88 · Oregon Tax Court · Mar 30, 2020

    The court, applying the framework set out in Tuckenberry v. Board of Parole, 365 Or 640, 451 P3d 227 (2019), held that issue exhaustion was not required in this case. … Would they go to the board in every county? You know, I’ve got twenty-five miles of wire or pipe in your county and I’ve 98 Charter Communications Holding Co. v. Dept. of Rev.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    193 Minn. 211 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jan 4, 1935

    Brown (now Louise M. … See Dacey v. Dacey, 179 Minn. 520 , 229 N. W. 868 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. GEER-BROWN

    756 N.W.2d 481 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · Aug 13, 2008

    756 N.W.2d 481 (2008) BROWN v. GEER-BROWN. No. 07-1635. Court of Appeals of Iowa. August 13, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed as Modified and Remanded.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Brown Co.

    160 F.2d 449 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Mar 5, 1947

    See International Ass’n of Machinists v. Labor Board, 311 U.S. 72 , 61 S.Ct. 83 , 85 L.Ed. 50 ; H. J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board, 311 U.S. 514 , 61 S.Ct. 320 , 85 L.Ed. 309 ; National Labor Board v. … Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584 , 61 S.Ct. 358 , 85 L.Ed. 368 ; New Idea v. Labor Board, 7 Cir., 117 F.2d 517 ; National Labor Board v. Moench Tanning Co., 2 Cir., 121 F.2d 951 ; National Labor Board v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State v. School Bd. of Sarasota County

    561 So. 2d 549 · Supreme Court of Florida · Apr 26, 1990

    561 So.2d 549 (1990) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF SARASOTA COUNTY, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. … State v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Hutson

    333 Ill. App. 3d 486 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 20, 2002

    Sharon Pelton, a board-certified, emergency room physician. Dr. Pelton testified that she evaluated plaintiff on January 23, 1996. … Brown v. Baker, 88 Ill. 2d 81, 85 , 430 N.E.2d 1126, 1127 (1981). In Illinois, the question of damages is peculiarly one of fact for the jury. Flynn v. Vancil, 41 Ill. 2d 236, 240 , 242 N.E.2d 237, 240 (1968).

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Devereux v. Berger

    264 Md. 20 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 14, 1972

    In Metropolitan Acceptance Corporation v. Irving D. Berger, No. 204, Sept. … In Devereux v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Artiglio v. Superior Court

    22 Cal. App. 4th 1388 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1994

    (Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 44 Cal.3d at p. 1061 .) … (Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 44 Cal.3d at p. 1069 .)

    Cited 25 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.