Case law

City of Oklahoma City v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

789 P.2d 1287 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 1990

No. 1 v. Board of County Comm’rs, 674 P.2d 547, 550 (Okla.1983), govern. … City of New Orleans v. Fisher, 180 U.S. 185, 197 , 21 S.Ct. 347, 352 , 45 L.Ed. 485, 492 (1901); Board of Educ. v. Salt Lake County, 659 P.2d 1030, 1036 (Utah 1983); State ex rel. Bd. of County Comm’rs v.

Mersereau v. WHITESBURG CENTER, INCORPORATED

47 Ala. App. 146 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Aug 18, 1971

Brown v. O’Byrne, 153 Ala. 621 , 45 So. 129 ; Williams v. A. O. Atchison Furniture Co., 46 Ala.App. 132 , 239 So.2d 204 . … The argument in support of this assignment in brief is that the Brown v.

Baker v. Hutson

333 Ill. App. 3d 486 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 20, 2002

Sharon Pelton, a board-certified, emergency room physician. Dr. Pelton testified that she evaluated plaintiff on January 23, 1996. … Brown v. Baker, 88 Ill. 2d 81, 85 , 430 N.E.2d 1126, 1127 (1981). In Illinois, the question of damages is peculiarly one of fact for the jury. Flynn v. Vancil, 41 Ill. 2d 236, 240 , 242 N.E.2d 237, 240 (1968).

City of East St. Louis v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board

213 Ill. App. 3d 1031 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 30, 1991

See City of Freeport v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board (1990), 135 Ill. 2d 499, 507 , 554 N.E.2d 155, 159 . … (County of Menard v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board (1988), 177 Ill. App. 3d 139, 143 , 531 N.E.2d 1080, 1083 .)

Lannay v. Wilson

30 Md. 536 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 1, 1869

Matter of Brown v. Brown

127 A.D.3d 1180 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 2015

Eschbach, 56 NY2d at 171-172 ; Kramer v Griffith, 119 AD3d 655, 656 [2014]; Matter of Mitchell v Mitchell, 113 AD3d 775, 776 [2014]). … ; Matter of Lane v Lane, 68 AD3d 995, 997 [2009]).

Sensing v. Harris

217 Ariz. 261 · Court of Appeals of Arizona · Dec 20, 2007

See also Chicago v. … For example, a professional licensing board may have discretion to deny a license, but it may not delay an application for an extended period when the statutes require it to act. Eastman v.

McCray v. SALAH UDDIN SHAMS, MD, SC

224 Ill. App. 3d 999 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 10, 1992

Shams was not board certified. … situation in Ward v.

Advance at Branchburg II, LLC v. Township Of branchburg Board of Adjustment

433 N.J. Super. 247 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 1, 2013

Nevertheless, we "recognize the board's knowledge of local circumstances and accord deference to its interpretation." Fallone, supra, 369 N.J. Super. at 562; accord DePetro v. … That determination will govern whether we apply the Sica or Medici standard to our review of the Board's actions. Advance relies on our decision in Homes of Hope, Inc. v.

Clarke v. Board of Appeals of Nahant

338 Mass. 473 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 3, 1959

See Gordon v. Guernsey, 316 Mass. 106, 108 . See also Davis & O’Connor Co. v. Shell Oil Co. Inc. 311 Mass. 401, 403 . … See Corbett v. Derman Shoe Co., ante, 405, 409.

States Steamship Company, a Corporation v. Permanente Steamship Corporation, a Corporation

231 F.2d 82 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 6, 1956

As observed in Oriental Trading & Transport Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp., 2 Cir., 173 F.2d 108 , certiorari denied Gulf Oil Corp. v. M/V The John A. … Brown, 1949, 337 U.S. 919 , 69 S.Ct. 1162 , 93 L.Ed. 1728 : “The purpose of * * * all rules touching signals * * * is to advise the ship to which the signal is addressed that she can no longer rely upon the signalling ship

Brown v. Brown

193 Minn. 211 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jan 4, 1935

Brown (now Louise M. … See Dacey v. Dacey, 179 Minn. 520 , 229 N. W. 868 .

Devereux v. Berger

264 Md. 20 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 14, 1972

In Metropolitan Acceptance Corporation v. Irving D. Berger, No. 204, Sept. … In Devereux v.

State v. School Bd. of Sarasota County

561 So. 2d 549 · Supreme Court of Florida · Apr 26, 1990

561 So.2d 549 (1990) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF SARASOTA COUNTY, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. … State v.

Brown v. Brown

211 Ark. 241 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 10, 1947

The statute is discussed at length in Davis v. Cullums, 205 Ark. 390 , 168 S. W. 2d 1103 . In 1932 John Oliver Brown married Martha, a widow with two sons and a daughter. … Corney v. Corney, 97 Ark. 117 , 133 S.

Thomas v. State

94 Nev. 605 · Nevada Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1978

Good v. United States, 378 F.2d 934, 935 (9th Cir. 1967). The primary contention of counsel on appeal is that the trial court did not adequately inquire into the problem. He cites Brown v. … United States v. Sexton, 473 F.2d 512 (5th Cir. 1973); Good v. United States, supra; United States ex rel. Baskerville v. Deegan, supra; United States v.

Charter Communications Holding Co. v. Dept. of Rev.

24 Or. Tax 88 · Oregon Tax Court · Mar 30, 2020

The court, applying the framework set out in Tuckenberry v. Board of Parole, 365 Or 640, 451 P3d 227 (2019), held that issue exhaustion was not required in this case. … Would they go to the board in every county? You know, I’ve got twenty-five miles of wire or pipe in your county and I’ve 98 Charter Communications Holding Co. v. Dept. of Rev.

Brown v. GEER-BROWN

756 N.W.2d 481 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · Aug 13, 2008

756 N.W.2d 481 (2008) BROWN v. GEER-BROWN. No. 07-1635. Court of Appeals of Iowa. August 13, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed as Modified and Remanded.

National Labor Relations Board v. Brown Co.

160 F.2d 449 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Mar 5, 1947

See International Ass’n of Machinists v. Labor Board, 311 U.S. 72 , 61 S.Ct. 83 , 85 L.Ed. 50 ; H. J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board, 311 U.S. 514 , 61 S.Ct. 320 , 85 L.Ed. 309 ; National Labor Board v. … Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584 , 61 S.Ct. 358 , 85 L.Ed. 368 ; New Idea v. Labor Board, 7 Cir., 117 F.2d 517 ; National Labor Board v. Moench Tanning Co., 2 Cir., 121 F.2d 951 ; National Labor Board v.

Woodbury v. Zoning Board of Warwick

78 R.I. 319 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Jun 29, 1951

Harrison v. Zoning Board of Review, 74 R. I. 135. … The language of the ordinance giving the board power to make such exceptions is broad, general, and has no reference to time limits. In Morris v. Zoning Board of Review, 52 R.