Case law

Brown v. Brown

213 Ark. 58 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 15, 1948

Brown did not have his glasses. Mrs. Brown handed Mr. Brown his glasses. Witness read the deed to Mr. Brown several times as he did not understand the habendum clause. … Brown sign the deed, but did not hear him give any instructions about it. It is essential to the valadity of a deed not only that it be executed, but it is required also that it be delivered. In the case of Cleveland v.

Martin v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 11, 2025

“The court does not sit as a ‘super correction board.’” King v. United States, 149 Fed. Cl. 272, 275 (2020) (quoting Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. at 331, 594 F.2d at 829). … .”); Van Cleave v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 674, 678–79 (2006) (While the court does not “serve as a ‘super correction board[,]’ Skinner v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Brown

310 F.2d 539 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 14, 1962

For example, Garner, President of the Association, was designated by the Board as “head” shipping clerk of Brown Wholesale. … Wayside Press, Inc. v. N. L. R. B., supra note 7, at 806.

Brown v. Brown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 2023

Neither  BROWN V. … ” -3-  BROWN V.

Brown v. Brown

78 Ohio App. 3d 416 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1992

See Booth v. Booth (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 142 , 541 N.E.2d 1028 . … Blakemore v. Blakemore (1983), 5 Ohio St.3d 217 , 5 OBR 481, 450 N.E.2d 1140 .

Huhta v. State Board of Medicine

706 A.2d 1275 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1998

Cassella v. State Board of Medicine, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, 119 Pa.Cmwlth. 394 , 547 A2d 506, 512 (1988). … Slawek v. State Board of Medical Education and Licensure, 526 Pa. 316 , 586 A.2d 362 (1991). 3 . 63 P.S. § 422.41(8). 4 . 63 P.S. § 422.41(6). 5 .

Brown, D. v. Brown, P.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2021

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT DIANA BROWN, : No. 645 MAL 2020 : Respondent … Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v

Williams v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF MILWAUKEE

323 Wis. 2d 179 · Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · Dec 22, 2009

Harris v. Annuity & Pension Bd., 87 Wis. 2d 646, 651-52 , 275 N.W.2d 668 *186 (1979). … Robinson v. City of West Allis, 2000 WI 126, ¶ 44 , 239 Wis. 2d 595 , 619 N.W.2d 692 .

Rivera v. BROWN & BROWN

41 So. 3d 897 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 3, 2010

41 So.3d 897 (2010) RIVERA v. BROWN & BROWN. No. 1D09-4663. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. August 3, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

Keylon v. City of Albuquerque

535 F.3d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Aug 5, 2008

See Brown v. … ."); McCoy v.

Myers v. State

395 Md. 261 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Oct 24, 2006

In Brown v. … Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). 17 . See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. at 605 n. 12, 95 S.Ct. at 2262 n. 12, 45 L.Ed.2d at 416 n. 12; U.S. v.

Brown v. Brown

10 Fla. L. Weekly 1963 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 14, 1985

Brown v. Brown (In re Brown)

7 B.R. 268 · District Court, D. New York · Dec 3, 1980

, be and the same remain vested in the plaintiff, DEBORAH BROWN and that defendant will pay $40.00 per week for the support of said infant, and it is further. … Brown, to the First National Bank of Wayland fails both tests because first it is not payable to the wife and/or child of the debtor and secondly it is not in the nature of alimony.

Brown v. Brown

134 F.2d 505 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 1942

Bussius v. Bussius, D.C.1941, 38 F.Supp. 871 . The entire procedure is a consent procedure. Cf. Mahoney v.

Baghdikian v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Ramsey

247 N.J. Super. 45 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 28, 1991

However, a zoning board, as any administrative agency, cannot be equated with courts. Kramer v. Board of Adj., Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268, 284, 289 , 212 A. 2d 153 (1965). … In Peoples Trust Co. of Bergen Cty. v. Board of Adj. of Bor. of Hasbrouck Heights, 60 N.J.

Borden v. Antonelli Coll.

304 F. Supp. 3d 678 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 29, 2018

See Russ v. … Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc. , 545 Fed.Appx. 368 , 372 (6th Cir. 2013). Here, Ms. Borden did not respond to Defendants' argument regarding promissory estoppel.

Brown v. Brown

123 Cal. App. 283 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1932

Brown”; that “she never lived with him and never wants to live with him”; and many other statements are contained in the transcript in support of the complaint which, if believed by the trial judge, were sufficient proof … Bank of Findlay v. Terry, 103 Cal. App. 501 [ 285 Pac. 336 ] ; Greenzweig v. Strelinger, 103 Cal. 278 [ 37 Pac. 398 ] ; Smith v. Moore Mill & Lumber Co., 101 Cal.

Brown v. Brown

169 Ala. 671 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 8, 1910

Miles v. Howard University

653 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 2016

Allen v. Johnson, 795 F.3d 34, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (quoting Brady v. Office of Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d 490, 494 (D.C. Cir. 2008)). … See Anderson v.

Brown v. Brown

68 Ala. 114 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1880

If the complainant, Clara Brown, have any interest or estate in the lands, their issues or profits, or any right to occupy them, which she has not forfeited, her remedy at law was adequate and complete. … Brown. This judgment to take effect as of July 16th, 1878, when this cause was submitted.