Case law

Mangum v. Mississippi Parole Board

76 So. 3d 762 · Court of Appeals of Mississippi · Nov 29, 2011

Mangum alleged that he was discriminated against by the Mississippi Parole Board (“Board”) because of his race. … Lewis v. Delta Loans, Inc., 300 So.2d 142, 144-45 (Miss.1974) (citing Testa v.

School Board of Sumter County v. Brown

54 So. 3d 610 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 18, 2011

See Goble v. Frohman, 901 So.2d 830 (Fla.2005); cf. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp. v. Lasky, 868 So.2d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), review dismissed, 873 So.2d 1225 (Fla.2004). AFFIRMED.

Keylon v. City of Albuquerque

535 F.3d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Aug 5, 2008

See Brown v. … ."); McCoy v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Brown

310 F.2d 539 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 14, 1962

For example, Garner, President of the Association, was designated by the Board as “head” shipping clerk of Brown Wholesale. … Wayside Press, Inc. v. N. L. R. B., supra note 7, at 806.

Myers v. State

395 Md. 261 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Oct 24, 2006

In Brown v. … Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). 17 . See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. at 605 n. 12, 95 S.Ct. at 2262 n. 12, 45 L.Ed.2d at 416 n. 12; U.S. v.

Brown v. Brown

213 Ark. 58 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 15, 1948

Brown did not have his glasses. Mrs. Brown handed Mr. Brown his glasses. Witness read the deed to Mr. Brown several times as he did not understand the habendum clause. … Brown sign the deed, but did not hear him give any instructions about it. It is essential to the valadity of a deed not only that it be executed, but it is required also that it be delivered. In the case of Cleveland v.

Huhta v. State Board of Medicine

706 A.2d 1275 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1998

Cassella v. State Board of Medicine, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, 119 Pa.Cmwlth. 394 , 547 A2d 506, 512 (1988). … Slawek v. State Board of Medical Education and Licensure, 526 Pa. 316 , 586 A.2d 362 (1991). 3 . 63 P.S. § 422.41(8). 4 . 63 P.S. § 422.41(6). 5 .

Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Brown

78 Ind. Dec. 766 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 1980

NLRB v. Donnelly Garment Co., (1947) 330 U.S. 219 , 67 S.Ct. 756 , 91 L.Ed. 854 . We see no decisive distinction in the case at hand. Judgment reversed. NEAL and RATLIFF, JJ., concur. . … The board shall base its final decision on the report, any additional evidence taken by the board, and any records that the board considers relevant. .

Williams v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF MILWAUKEE

323 Wis. 2d 179 · Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · Dec 22, 2009

Harris v. Annuity & Pension Bd., 87 Wis. 2d 646, 651-52 , 275 N.W.2d 668 *186 (1979). … Robinson v. City of West Allis, 2000 WI 126, ¶ 44 , 239 Wis. 2d 595 , 619 N.W.2d 692 .

Brown v. Brown (In re Brown)

7 B.R. 268 · District Court, D. New York · Dec 3, 1980

, be and the same remain vested in the plaintiff, DEBORAH BROWN and that defendant will pay $40.00 per week for the support of said infant, and it is further. … Brown, to the First National Bank of Wayland fails both tests because first it is not payable to the wife and/or child of the debtor and secondly it is not in the nature of alimony.

Brown, D. v. Brown, P.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2021

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT DIANA BROWN, : No. 645 MAL 2020 : Respondent … Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v

Brown v. Brown

10 Fla. L. Weekly 1963 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 14, 1985

Rivera v. BROWN & BROWN

41 So. 3d 897 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 3, 2010

41 So.3d 897 (2010) RIVERA v. BROWN & BROWN. No. 1D09-4663. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. August 3, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

Commonwealth v. Dobrolenski

460 Pa. 630 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1975

Commonwealth v. … In the words of Justice Frankfurter, writing for the United States Supreme Court in Brown v.

Brown v. Brown

123 Cal. App. 283 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1932

Brown”; that “she never lived with him and never wants to live with him”; and many other statements are contained in the transcript in support of the complaint which, if believed by the trial judge, were sufficient proof … Bank of Findlay v. Terry, 103 Cal. App. 501 [ 285 Pac. 336 ] ; Greenzweig v. Strelinger, 103 Cal. 278 [ 37 Pac. 398 ] ; Smith v. Moore Mill & Lumber Co., 101 Cal.

Brown v. Brown

68 Ala. 114 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1880

If the complainant, Clara Brown, have any interest or estate in the lands, their issues or profits, or any right to occupy them, which she has not forfeited, her remedy at law was adequate and complete. … Brown. This judgment to take effect as of July 16th, 1878, when this cause was submitted.

Baghdikian v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Ramsey

247 N.J. Super. 45 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 28, 1991

However, a zoning board, as any administrative agency, cannot be equated with courts. Kramer v. Board of Adj., Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268, 284, 289 , 212 A. 2d 153 (1965). … In Peoples Trust Co. of Bergen Cty. v. Board of Adj. of Bor. of Hasbrouck Heights, 60 N.J.

Borden v. Antonelli Coll.

304 F. Supp. 3d 678 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 29, 2018

See Russ v. … Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc. , 545 Fed.Appx. 368 , 372 (6th Cir. 2013). Here, Ms. Borden did not respond to Defendants' argument regarding promissory estoppel.

Luchejko v. City of Hoboken

207 N.J. 191 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 2011

See Brown v. Saint Venantius Sch., 111 N.J. 325, 335 , 544 A.2d 842 (1988) (“[W]e acknowledge the well-settled principal that municipal ordinances do not create a tort duty, as a matter of law.”); Lodato v. … State v. Brown, 190 N.J. 144, 157 , 919 A.2d 107 (2007) (quoting Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428, 443 , 120 S.Ct. 2326, 2336 , 147 L.Ed.2d 405, 419 (2000)); see also Flomerfelt v.

Miles v. Howard University

653 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 2016

Allen v. Johnson, 795 F.3d 34, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (quoting Brady v. Office of Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d 490, 494 (D.C. Cir. 2008)). … See Anderson v.