Case law

Enloe Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

433 F.3d 834 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 23, 2005

Printing Div. v. NLRB, 501 U.S. 190, 202-03 (1991) (citing Local Union 1395, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. NLRB, 797 F.2d 1027, 1030-31 (D.C. Cir. 1986)); see also BP Amoco Corp. v. … The Board developed this approach to contract interpretation by analogy from a case in a different context. In First National Maintenance Corp. v.

Local 483 v. National Labor Relations Board

288 F.2d 166 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 22, 1961

288 F.2d 166 109 U.S.App.D.C. 382 LOCAL 483, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS, IRON SHIP BUILDERS, BLACKSMITHS, FORGERS & HELPERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al., Petitioners, v. … See American Potash & Chemical Corp., 107 N.L.R.B. 1418 (1954) 3 Midwest Piping and Supply Co., 63 N.L.R.B. 1060 (1945) 4 See Jones, Self-Determination v.

Wilson v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

289 A.2d 380 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1972

Robey v. Schwab, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 241 , 307 F.2d 198 (1962); Castle v. McLaughlin, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 145 , 270 F.2d 448 (1959); Jarrott v. Scrivener; 225 F.Supp. 827 (D.D.C.1964). … Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535 (decided February 17, 1972). 10 . See notes 3 and 4. 11 . Palmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra note 9 . See also Puritan-Greenfield Improvement Ass’n v.

In re Brown

766 A.2d 527 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2001

Brown at the urging of the Board. The Board’s recommendation came in response to a bad check made out by Mr. … Brown’s discipline in this new Maryland case was based on several complaints of misconduct in that state, see Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v.

Pierce v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

882 A.2d 199 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2005

Affairs v. … Fontenot v.

Ocasio v. Merit Systems Protection Board

244 F. Supp. 3d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 23, 2017

P. 56(a); see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247–48 (1986); Holcomb v. Powell, 433 F.3d 889, 895 (D.C. Cir. 2006). … Wilbur v. C.I.A., 355 F.3d 675, 678 (D.C. Cir. 2004); see also Yeager v. Drug Enforcement Admin., 678 F.2d 315, 321 (D.C.

Brown v. Prince Georges County Police Department

368 F. App'x 147 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a).

Railway Express Agency v. Civil Aeronautics Board

243 F.2d 422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 28, 1957

See Ayrshire Collieries Corp. v. … United States, 292 U.S. 282, 288 , 54 S.Ct. 692 , 78 L.Ed. 1260 ; Lang v.

Seaboard & Western Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

183 F.2d 975 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 5, 1950

The present petition asks review of the Board’s order denying a temporary exemption. The point to which petitioner’s brief and argument are directed is that the Board failed to make adequate findings. … Petitioner did not urge this objection before the Board, despite the fact that petitioner asked the Board for a rehearing on other grounds. The objection therefore comes too late.

Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

243 F.2d 607 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1957

243 F.2d 607 100 U.S.App.D.C. 184 EASTERN AIR LINES, Inc., Petitioner, v. … The Board denied these motions. Eastern petitions for review. 10 We think that under our decision in United Air Lines v.

Lunceford v. District of Columbia Board of Education

745 F.2d 1577 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 16, 1984

.”); Monahan v. … See Hendrick Hudson District School Board v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 198-200 , 102 S.Ct. 3034, 3046-3048 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982).

Allied Industrial Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

476 F.2d 868 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 12, 1973

Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). 16 Conduct by an employer which discourages a union activity protected by § 7 may also discourage and discriminate against membership in a labor organization. 17 … a whole. 24 NLRB v.

Puget Sound Traffic Association v. Civil Aeronautics Board

536 F.2d 437 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 1976

Section 1006(a) of the Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 1486 (a) (1963), 2 which *439 gives this court power to review Board orders, has been judicially restricted to review of final agency orders. McManus v. … App.D.C. 80, 402 F.2d 631, 633 (1968); Isbrandtsen Co. v. United States, 93 U.S.App. D.C. 293, 211 F.2d 51, 56 , cert. denied sub nom. Federal Maritime Board v.

Nova Plumbing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

330 F.3d 531 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 2003

Nova argues that the Board’s reliance on contract language alone directly contradicts International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union v. NLRB, 366 U.S. 731 (1961). … The Board cites Third and Tenth Circuit cases upholding Board rulings that contract language alone may establish the existence of a section 9(a) relationship in the construction industry. See NLRB v.

Matson Terminals, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

114 F.3d 300 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 1997

In any event, we must uphold the finding of unlawful motive by the Board so long as there is substantial evidence in the record to support it. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); see Passaic Daily News v. … As we noted above, the Board’s *304 factual findings, including motive, are conclusive as supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e). Universal Camera v.

Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

934 A.2d 428 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 2007

Area Transit Auth. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 827 A.2d 35, 40 (D.C.2003). Petitioner cites Brown v. … Ctr. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 746 A.2d 278 , 281 (D.C.2000)) (citing Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 700 A.2d 787, 791 (D.C.1997)) (same). 6 . See, e.g., Bagbonon v.

Russell Morton Brown v. Edward Oliver Lamb and Dispatch, Inc.

414 F.2d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 17, 1969

The court cited Hornblower v. George Washington University, 31 App.D.C. 64 (1908); Moore v. Snider, 71 App.D.C. 293 , 109 F.2d 840 , cert. denied, Snider v. … Burnett v. New York Central R. R.

Buffalo Crushed Stone, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

194 F.3d 125 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 29, 1999

The Board's articulation of a reasoned basis for its decision distinguishes this case from Jost v. STB, No. 99-1054, slip op., 1999 WL 961167 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 22, 1999). … Jost v. STB, slip op. at 14-15. In this case, the Board has adequately articulated the reasons for its decision.

Precision Concrete v. National Labor Relations Board

362 F.3d 847 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 2004

NLRB v. Fant Milling Co., 360 U.S. 301 (1959). … Obedient to Hensley v.

Dean Transportation, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

551 F.3d 1055 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 9, 2009

(quoting Golden State Bottling Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 414 U.S. 168, 184 (1973)); see Pennsylvania Transformer Tech., Inc. v. NLRB, 254 F.3d 217, 222 (D.C. Cir. 2001); CitiSteel USA, Inc. v. NLRB, 53 F.3d 350, 353 (D.C. … Corp., Inc. v. NLRB, 508 F.3d 28, 33 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (quoting American Postal Workers Union v. NLRB, 370 F.3d 25, 28 (D.C. Cir. 2004)); cf. id.