Case law

State v. Brown

64 Or. 473 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1913

for reward or hire shall do any act of dentistry, without having filed for record and having recorded in the office of the county recorder of the county wherein he shall so practice or do such act a certificate from said board … State v. Carr, 6 Or. 133 ; State v. Miller, 54 Or. 381 ( 103 Pac. 519 ). 2, 3. It is claimed that Section 4780, L. O.

Moore v. Brown

19 Or. App. 199 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 14, 1974

See, Rea v. Rea, 195 Or 252 , 245 P2d 884 , 35 ALR2d 612 (1952); Wood v. School District No. 13 et al., 107 Or 280 , 214 P 589 (1923); Wyatt v. Wyatt, 31 Or 531 , 49 P 855 (1897); Shiffer v. … Brown et ux v. Hassenstab et ux, 212 Or 246 , 319 P2d 929 (1957).

Brown v. Bryant

244 Or. 321 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1966

Joseph Brown was asked what he himself said and he answered that question. There the matter rested. … Elliott et al, supra, 212 Or at 494 ; Johnson v. Underwood et al, supra, 102 Or at 696 .

Conant v. Brown

248 F. Supp. 3d 1014 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 29, 2017

Conant, appearing pro se, brings this voting rights action against Kate Brown, Governor of the State of Oregon, and Ellen Rosenbaum, Oregon’s Attorney General. … Ray v.

Silverton v. Brown

63 Or. 418 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1912

See Lais v. Smith, 63 Or. 206 ( 127 Pac. 26 ) ; Quinn v. Willamette Pulp & Paper Co., 62 Or. 549 ( 126 Pac. 1 ). We think this question was properly submitted to the jury. … Schooling v. Harrisburg, 42 Or. 494 ( 71 Pac. 605 ). 6, 7.

Brown v. Dorfman

251 Or. 522 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1968

See Trotter v. Town of Stayton, 45 Or 301 , 77 P 395 (1904); Starr v. Stark, 7 Or 500 (1879). … See McElwain v. Georgia-Pacific, 245 Or 247 , 421 P2d 957 (1966); Williams v. Goose Lake Valley Irr. Co., 83 Or 302, 310 , 163 P 81 (1917).

Brown v. Hilleary

147 Or. 185 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1934

See Leahy v. Cardwell, 14 Or. 172 ( 12 P. 307 ); Morse v. Maerum; 22 Or. 229 ( 29 P. 615 , 30 P. 73 ); Sappingfield v. … In Leahy v.

State v. Brown

225 Or. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 7, 2009

In State v. Stubbs, 193 Or App 595, 604 , 91 P3d 774 (2004), we explained that ORS 138.050(1) “embodies a jurisdictional limitation on appeal.” … See, e.g., State v. Zell, 89 Or App 394 , 749 P2d 1196 (1988) (reaching same result under earlier version of ORS 138.050). Appeal dismissed. 1 Defendant received a deferred sentence pursuant to the plea agreement.

Lowe v. Brown

114 Or. 426 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1925

This is settled by the amount of the judgment demanded in the complaint: Troy v. Hallgarth , 35 Or. 162 ( 57 P. 374 ); Ferguson v. Beyers , 40 Or. 468 ( 67 P. 1115 , 69 P. 32 ). The plaintiff contends for $250. … Brown, the defendant, upon divers occasions declared that W.L. Lowe, plaintiff herein, was a sheep thief.

State v. Brown

143 Or. App. 263 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 1996

State v. … Thus, in State v.

State v. Brown

119 Or. App. 162 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 31, 1993

OAR253-12-020(2)(d); State v. Holliday, 110 Or App 426 , 824 P2d 1148 , rev den 313 Or 211 (1992). Defendant also argues that the court erred in imposing 18 months probation on each consecutive sentence. … State v. Dummitt, 115 Or App 487 , 839 P2d 246 (1992). The state argues that all the sentences should be remanded for resentencing and invites us to overrule State v.

Brown v. SAIF Corp.

262 Or. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 7, 2014

See, e.g., Schuler v. … .”); SAIF v.

State v. Brown

219 Or. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 30, 2008

State v. Marshall, 219 Or App 511 , 183 P3d 241 (2008).

State v. Brown

96 Or. App. 171 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 1989

State v. Kennedy, 295 Or 260 , 666 P2d 1316 (1983). … See Higgins v. Redding, 34 Or App 1029, 1034 , 580 P2d 580 , rev den 284 Or 80a (1978).

McGuire v. Brown

217 Or. 300 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1959

The Act deals with practical matters, and its phraseology should receive practical construction. * * *” Kosmecki v. Portland Stevedoring Co., 190 Or 85, 94 , 223 P2d 1035 . And from Inwall v. … Claussen v. Ireland, 216 Or 289 , 338 P2d 676 .

Brown v. Denton

257 Or. 161 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1970

State v. Brown

249 Or. App. 334 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 11, 2012

App. 334 STATE v. BROWN. A146353 Court of Appeals of Oregon. April 11, 2012. Affirmed without opinion.

State v. Brown

100 Or. App. 204 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 17, 1990

State v. Magee, supra, 304 Or at 266 . The court later confirmed that State v. Magee, supra, did not eliminate the requirement of “custody.” The opinion in State v. … The facts in State v. Vu, supra, and State v. Magee, supra, are also instructive.

State v. Brown

49 Or. App. 75 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 10, 1980

The facts leading to the discovery of the cocaine are not materially different from those that we held supported a lawful search and seizure in State v. Patton, 47 Or App 169 , 613 P2d 1102 (1980).

Knepper v. Brown

213 Or. App. 598 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 5, 2007

Believing that Brown was board certified as a plastic surgeon, Knepper added Brown’s name to her list of possible surgeons. … See, e.g.,In re Brown, 326 Or 582, 595 , 956 P2d 188 (1998); Riley Hill General Contractor v. Tandy Corp., 303 Or 390, 405 , 737 P2d 595 (1987); Conzelmann v. N. W. P. & D. Prod.