Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

4.91s

  • Brown v. Hartzell

    87 Mo. 564 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1885

    Cochran v. Whitesides, 34 Mo. 418 ; More v. Perry, 61 Mo. 174 ; Reed v. Price, 30 Mo. 446 ; Ware v. Johnson, 55 Mo. 502 . In Watts v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Highfill v. Brown

    320 S.W.2d 493 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 12, 1959

    Missouri cases condemning instructions requiring a degree of proof “to the satisfaction of the jury” are Ilgenfritz v. Quinn, Mo., 318 S.W.2d 186 ; Machens v. … Machens, Mo., 263 S.W.2d 724 , loc. cit. 730-732(5, 6) ; Seago v. New York Central R.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Baldwin

    121 Mo. 126 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1894

    After the ejectment suit of Pool v. … In Strickland v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Kennedy

    309 Mo. 335 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 1, 1925

    In the case of Fletcher v. Daugherty, 13 N. W. … Reilly, 61 Mo. 565 ; *341 Philips v. Bailey, 82 Mo. 639 ; Wolz v. Parker, 134 Mo. 458 ; State ex rel. v. Ross, 136 Mo. 259 ; Potter v. Schaffer, 209 Mo. 586 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Walker

    85 Mo. 262 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

    It is in harmony with prior rulings of this court, as well as more recent decisions, to the same effect: (Wellshear v. Kelley, 69 Mo. 343 , and Gray v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Grohmann v. Brown

    68 Mo. App. 630 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1897

    Kimball v. Davis, 52 Mo. App. 194 . … Dairy Co. v. Mooney, 41 Mo. App. 665 ; Welsh v. Brewing Co., 47 Mo. App. 608 ; Glass v. Brewing Co., 47 Mo. 641 ; Drug Co.v. Robinson, 81 Mo.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    495 S.W.2d 690 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 15, 1973

    State, supra, 488 S.W.2d at 654 ; Geren v. State, 473 S.W.2d 704, 707 (Mo.1971); Simpson v. State, 487 S.W.2d 512, 513 (Mo.1972); State v. Brown, 449 S.W.2d 664, 666 (Mo.1970); Johnson v. … State v. Williams, 361 S.W.2d 772, 775 (Mo. banc 1962); Drew v. State, 436 S.W. 2d 727, 729 (Mo.1969); State v. Cochran, 332 Mo. 742 , 60 S.W.2d 1, 2 (1933) ; State v. Rose, 440 S.W.2d 441, 443 (Mo.1969); Flood v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    246 S.W.3d 519 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 3, 2008

    Brown: I am writing to confirm the promises I made to you over the telephone a few minutes ago. … See State v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Cox v. Brown

    227 Mo. App. 157 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1932

    After Paul Brown's death, plaintiff did laundry work for his widow, Mrs. Inez Hereford Brown, until some time in April, 1928. … [Hovey v. Grier, 324 Mo. 634 , 23 S.W.2d 1058 , l.c. 1065.] Plaintiff, however, was not in the continuous employ of the testator for ten years.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    607 S.W.2d 801 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1980

    Brown has appealed and now contends that under Schellert v. … State v. Leonard, 606 S.W.2d 403 (Mo.App.1980). All concur. 1 . Brown does not contend the court impermis-sibly participated in the plea bargain.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    533 S.W.3d 823 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2017

    ORDER PER CURIAM Dwayne Brown (“Brown”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his amended Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. … After an evidentiary hearing, the motion court denied Brown’s amended motion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commonwealth

    540 S.W.3d 374 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 2018

    The Court of Appeals in Fields v. … The Court of Appeals in Boone v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Howard v. Brown

    197 Mo. 36 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 19, 1906

    [Smith v. Ross, 7 Mo. 463 ; State v. Martin, 10 Mo. 391 ; State v. Moore, 61 Mo. 276 ; Phillips v. *47 Evans, 64 Mo. 23 ; Skelton v. Sackett, 91 Mo. 377 ; Beckner v. McLinn, 107 Mo. 277 ; Corrigan v. … Schmidt, 126 Mo. 304 ; Turner v. Gregory, 151 Mo. 100 .]

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    492 S.W.2d 762 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1973

    Burnside v. State, 473 S.W.2d 697 [1] (Mo. 1971). … Coleman v. State, 473 S.W.2d 692, 695 [3] (Mo.1971); Gaitan v. State, 464 S.W.2d 33, 36 [5-9] (Mo.1971).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Welsh v. Brown

    339 Mo. 235 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 20, 1936

    In the late case of Ballenger et al. v. Windes, 338 Mo. 1039 , 93 S.W.2d 882 , Division One, by a divided court, overruled Tooker v. Missouri Power Light Co. and Williams v. … [Bell v. Barrett, supra; Indian Creek Land Co. v. Bradford (Mo.), 82 S.W.2d 589 .] [3] Both parties cite Swope v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • McDowell v. Brown

    21 Mo. 57 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1855

    Doe v. Carter, 8 Durn. & East, 61.) The judgment, with the concurrence of the other judges, is affirmed.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Gammon

    947 S.W.2d 437 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1997

    As part of the *440 report, the Board of Probation and Parole evaluated Mr. Brown’s performance in the substance abuse program at the Farmington Treatment Center. It was reported that Mr. … Merriweather v. Grandison, 904 S.W.2d 485, 489 (Mo.App.1995); Walls v. Delo, 755 F.Supp. 873, 875 (E.D.Mo.1991). Here, Mr.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    554 S.W.2d 574 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 26, 1977

    Ann Brown, defendant’s wife, who was driving westwardly on Russell Avenue, stopped her car opposite the officers’ parked car. … Politte v. Wall, 256 S.W.2d 283 (Mo.App.1953). Defendant sought no affirmative relief. Defendant, however, need not seek affirmative relief in such a situation. State v. Brown, 547 S.W.2d 797, 804 [9] (Mo. banc 1977).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    206 Mo. 501 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 13, 1907

    [Bollinger v. Carrier, 79 Mo. 318 ; St. Louis v. Boyce, 130 Mo. 572 ; Jackson v. Ferguson, 76 Mo. App. 270 ; Turney v. Ewins, 97 Mo. App. 620 ; Crossland v. Admire, 149 Mo. 650 ; Hill v. Combs, 92 Mo. App. 242 .] … “The presumption is that the Legislature never intended to enact an absurd law incapable of being intelligibly enforced. ’ ’ [Bingham v. Birmingham, 103 Mo. l. c. 352; Railroad v. Brick Co., 85 Mo. 307 ; State v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Parker

    375 S.W.2d 594 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1964

    Golian v. Stanley, supra. … Wurth v. Wurth, supra.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.