Case law

Holrail, LLC v. Surface Transportation Board

515 F.3d 1313 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 22, 2008

Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994). “In determining whether a statutory provision speaks directly to the question before us, we consider it in context.” Holly Sugar Corp. v. Johanns, 437 F.3d 1210, 1213 (D.C. … Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.

Brown v. Brown

260 A.2d 675 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1970

Brown’s children. … Brown filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that his wife, having accepted the alimony payments, is estop-ped from appealing. Stein v. Stein, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 286 , 170 F.2d 162 (1948); Harris v.

United States v. Jovanovic

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2025

See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … See also Thorp v. District of Columbia, 142 F. Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v.

Brown v. Brown

7 D.C. 221 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1869

Brown, a colored man, died seized of the lot of ground in dispute five or six years ago, leaving a widow, the defendant, but no children. … Ennis, showing that he had full authority from Amelia Brown to make the arrangement for compromise on the terms already stated, and therefore to appear for and answer the complainant’s bill in her name.

Russell v. Harman International Industries, Inc.

773 F.3d 253 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 2014

See Colbert v. Potter, 471 F.3d 158, 168 (D.C. … Compare Trucking Emp’rs, 561 F.2d at 318 (Title VII waivers must be knowing and voluntary), and Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 456 n.10 (D.C.

Brown v. Brown

134 F.2d 505 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 1942

Bussius v. Bussius, D.C.1941, 38 F.Supp. 871 . The entire procedure is a consent procedure. Cf. Mahoney v.

Miles v. Howard University

653 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 2016

Allen v. Johnson, 795 F.3d 34, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (quoting Brady v. Office of Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d 490, 494 (D.C. Cir. 2008)). … See Anderson v.

Brown v. MOORE-BROWN

991 A.2d 33 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 2010

Drewrey v. Clinton

763 F. Supp. 2d 54 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2011

Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C.Cir.1985) (stating that “because untimely exhaustion of administrative remedies is an affirmative defense, the defendant bears the burden of pleading and proving it”). … Dist. v.

Alden Leeds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

812 F.3d 159 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 5, 2016

Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 377 (1998). Credibility determinations made by the ALJ, as adopted by the Board, are accepted unless they are patently insupportable. NLRB v. … Co. v. NLRB, 380 U.S. 300, 318 (1965).

Brown v. Brown

122 F.2d 219 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 1941

Brown, filed suit in the District Court for an absolute divorce from the appellant, Mary E. Brown, upon the ground of adultery. … Brown vs. Mary Estelle Brown, et al., Equity No. 67598,’ and by reason thereof it is, by the Court, this 29 day of June, 1940, “ADJUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREED that the defendant, George A.

United States v. King

4 F. Supp. 3d 114 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2013

United States v. Brown, 504 F.3d 99, 104 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (quoting District of Columbia v. Hunt, 163 F.2d 833, 837–38 (D.C. Cir. 1947)). Section 924(c) is such a statute. … Brown v. Cameron, 353 F.2d 835, 836 n.1 (D.C. Cir. 1965).

Gentiva Health Services, Inc. v. Becerra

31 F.4th 766 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 15, 2022

To  14 the extent the Board’s decision is based “on the [text] of the Medicare Act itself, [the court] owe[s] deference [to the Board] under Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. … Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. Defs. of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644, 666 (2007) (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132–33 (2000)).

Dosso v. Barr

District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2020

(quoting Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994))). … Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 829 (1976); see also Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 542 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (“The Title VII remedy declared exclusive for federal employees in Brown v.

Prime Healthcare Services-Encino LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

890 F.3d 286 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 2018

Standard of Review Our review of the Board’s judgment is limited. Wilkes- Barre Hosp. Co., LLC v. NLRB, 857 F.3d 364, 372 (D.C. Cir. 2017). … Although the Board is authorized to interpret a collective bargaining agreement to resolve unfair labor practice charges, we owe “no deference to the Board’s interpretation.” NLRB v. U.S.

Brown v. Brown

97 F. Supp. 237 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 29, 1950

The attorneys who represented the plaintiff in her lifetime oppose said motion allegedly as her attorneys despite her death, and they have also filed a motion for. leave to intervene on behalf of Doris Brown Wesley who asserts

Speight v. United States

671 A.2d 442 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1996

See Cauthen v. United States, 592 A.2d 1021, 1022 (D.C.1991); Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991). … See Brown, 590 A.2d at 1015 .

Winter v. Brown Ex Rel. Brown

365 A.2d 381 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1976

In Wood v. … In Abbe v.

Brown v. Brown

205 F.2d 720 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 1953

In Kephart v.

Adams v. Department of Mental Health of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 27, 2011

District of Columbia, 980 A.2d 1217, 1223 (D.C. 2009) (explaining that “[t]he jurisdiction of the court and OHR are mutually exclusive in the first instance” (quoting Brown v. … Id. at 860 (quoting Brown v. Capitol Hill Club, 425 A.2d 1309, 1312 (1981)).