Case law

Pope v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

241 Or. App. 656 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 2011

Janowski / Fleming v. Board of Parole, 349 Or 432 , 245 P3d 1270 (2010).

Boise Cascade Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Board of Forestry

216 Or. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 5, 2007

Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry, 186 Or App 291 , 63 P3d 598 , rev den, 335 Or 578 , cert den, 540 US 1075 (2003) (Boise V). … Pacific University, 324 Or 231, 235 , 924 P2d 818 (1996) (quoting Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984)) (brackets in Conway).

Giese v. Employment Division

27 Or. App. 929 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 1976

v. … Neely v. Brown, 161 So2d 414 (La App 1964), and Smith v. Brown, 147 So2d 452 (La App 1962), are both cases in which off-duty conduct was held not to be work-connected.

Martinez v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

242 Or. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 13, 2011

App. 176 Ernest Raymond MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. A133672. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted on Remand March 21, 2011. Decided April 13, 2011. Walter J. … Janowski/Fleming v. Board of Parole, 349 Or. 432 , 245 P.3d 1270 (2010).

McMullen v. District School Board of School District 24J

21 Or. App. 56 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 7, 1975

See, Funston v. District School Board, etc., 130 Or 82 , 278 P 1075 (1929). … To the same effect see, Lommasson v. School Dist.

Vukasin v. Liberty Northwest Insurance

271 Or. App. 142 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 13, 2015

was required to analyze the compensability of the 2009 surgery under a different standard in the light of our recent decisions in Brown v. … a different legal standard for determining compensability than the standard articulated in the Brown line of cases.

Tillamook County v. State Ex Rel. State Board of Forestry

302 Or. 404 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1986

Tillamook County v. State Board of Forestry, supra, 75 Or App at 350 . The rule we stated in Hauke v. … Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982).

Cooper v. Travelers Ins. Co.

302 Or. App. 124 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 29, 2020

Amanda COOPER, Petitioner, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY and Brown Group Retail, Respondents. … Hammond v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp., 296 Or App 241, 437 P3d 269 (2019).

Schroeder v. Board of Parole

337 Or. App. 166 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2024

The board’s order explained its decision and provided a rational connection between the facts and the legal con- clusions it drew from them. See United Academics of OSU v. … He acknowledges that this court rejected that argument in Green v. Board of Parole, 308 Or App 159, 160, 478 P3d 608 (2020), rev den, 368 Or 138 (2021), and provides no basis for this court to overrule Green.

Simi v. LTI Inc. - Lynden Inc.

368 Or. 330 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 2021

Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 274, 391 P3d 773 (2017). … Crawford v.

SAIF Corp. v. Carlos-Macias

262 Or. App. 629 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 7, 2014

Counts v. International Paper Co., 146 Or App 768 , 934 P2d 526 (1997); Faught v. SAIF, 70 Or App 388 , 689 P2d 1038 (1984); Brooks v. D & R Timber, 55 Or App 688 , 639 P2d 700 (1982). … As we recently explained in Brown v. SAIF, 262 Or App 640 , 325 P3d 834 (2014), however, the terms “compensable injury” and “accepted condition” are not interchangeable.

Brusco Towboat Co. v. State Ex Rel. State Land Board

284 Or. 627 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1978

Co. v. … See, e.g., Heisley et al v. Eastman et al, 102 Or 137, 152 , 201 P 872 (1921); Shaw v. Proffitt, 57 Or 192, 213 , 109 P 584 , 110 P 1092 (1910); Ewing v. Rhea, 37 Or 583 , 62 P 790 (1900). See also Brown v.

Oregon Ass'n of Acupuncture & Oriental Medicine v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

260 Or. App. 676 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 23, 2014

See State v. … State v. Perry, 336 Or 49, 53 , 77 P3d 313 (2003); see also Hopkins v.

Schroeder v. Board of Parole

337 Or. App. 166 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2024

The board’s order explained its decision and provided a rational connection between the facts and the legal con- clusions it drew from them. See United Academics of OSU v. … He acknowledges that this court rejected that argument in Green v. Board of Parole, 308 Or App 159, 160, 478 P3d 608 (2020), rev den, 368 Or 138 (2021), and provides no basis for this court to overrule Green.

Pope v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

241 Or. App. 656 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 2011

App. 656 Charles Samuel POPE, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. A142511. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted December 20, 2010. Decided March 23, 2011. … Janowski/Fleming v. Board of Parole, 349 Or. 432 , 245 P.3d 1270 (2010).

Byrns v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

241 Or. App. 657 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 2011

App. 657 Gerald Lee BYRNS, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. A142800. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted December 20, 2010. Decided March 23, 2011. … Janowski/Fleming v. Board of Parole, 349 Or. 432 , 245 P.3d 1270 (2010).

Willis v. Oregon Railway & Navigation Co.

11 Or. 257 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1884

The roof consisted-of rough boards-laid from the high plate on the north of the shed to the low plate on the south. … Machine Co. v. Layman, 88 Ill., 39 ; Chicago and Alton R. Co. v. Mock, 72 Ill., 141 ; Thompson v. Shannon, 9 Texas, 556 ; Burns v. Kelty, 41 Miss., 339 ; Hays v. Hinds, 28 Ind., 553 ; Milton v.

Knutson Towboat Co. v. Oregon Board of Maritime Pilots

131 Or. App. 364 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 23, 1994

We note, initially, that it is petitioner’s burden to prove that Board members were biased. Teledyne Wah Chang v. Energy Fac. Siting Council, 298 Or 240, 262 , 692 P2d 86 (1984). … Portland Steamship Operators v. Coos Bay Pilots, 39 Or App 513, 516 , 592 P2d 1060 (1979).

Bailey v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

296 Or. 41 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1983

Gallea v. Willamette Industries, 56 Or App 763 , 643 P2d 390 (1982); Brown v. SAIF, 51 Or App 389 , 625 P2d 1351 (1981); Penfold v. … See Brown v. SAIF, 51 Or App 389 (1981). * * *” Id. at 172. It is clear from our discussion above that the Board has no such authority. ORCP 64 provides in pertinent part: “B.

Havice v. SAIF Corp.

80 Or. App. 448 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 23, 1986

However, as we have already noted, there are several references to low back pain in the reports, although, as Brown stated, they may not be indicative of a disc herniation. … See Grable v. Weyerhaeuser Company, 291 Or 387 , 631 P2d 768 (1981). We affirm the Board’s denial of interim compensation, attorney fees and penalties.