Case law

Cleveland Construction, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

44 F.3d 1010 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 24, 1995

Synergy Gas Corp v. N.L.R.B., 19 F.3d 649, 651 (D.C.Cir.1994). A bargaining unit determination will not stand if arbitrary and without substantial evidence. International Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local 171 v. … The Board’s opinion in this ease, however, is completely silent on the relationship between Deklewa and Dezcon. The agency is not free to ignore its precedent without explanation. Michigan Consol. Gas Co. v.

Protect the Public's Trust v. National Labor Relations Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2026

In 2015, the Board set forth its view of the appropriate joint employer standard in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., d/b/a BFI Newby Island Recyclery, 362 NLRB 1599 (2015). … However, “[i]n December 2017, after a change in the Board’s composition, the new Board majority issued a decision overruling Browning-Ferris and (. . . continued) Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment and Response in Opposition

Order of Ry. Conductors v. National Mediation Board

113 F.2d 531 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1940

Whlle thc Board s 1935 certification was • /*/• . -|-x t-v mi « • i , i • ,i « m effect, B. R. 1. advised the carrier that ... . ’ . ... „ r- ■ 1 j a if its agreement with O. R. … Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. National Mediation Board, 66 App.D.C. 375 , 88 F.2d 757 ; Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, etc., v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co., 6 Cir., 94 F.2d 97, 99 . The B. R.

Stevenson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

683 A.2d 1371 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1996

Convention Center Referendum Committee v. D.C. Board of Elections, 441 A.2d 871, 883 (D.C.1980), on rehearing, 441 A.2d 889, 913 (D.C.1981); Lawrence v. Board of Elections, 611 A.2d 529 (D.C.1992), quoting Kamins v. … Inc. v.

Thomas v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

355 A.2d 789 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 1976

Therefore, after suspension, petitioners sought review before respondent Board of Appeals and Review (the Board). … See Bell v. Burson supra; and Orr v. Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, supra.

Sherven v. Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 2023

) Case No. 22-cv-2412 (APM) PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES ) OVERSIGHT BOARD, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________ … Wilbur v. Cent. Intel. Agency, 355 F.3d 675, 676 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (internal quotation marks omitted). Here, Plaintiff received a final determination on his FOIA request on August 8, 2022. Compl., ECF No. 1, at 1.

Detroit Newspaper Agency v. National Labor Relations Board

435 F.3d 302 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 2006

furnishes, including the body of evidence opposed to the Board’s view.’ ” Epilepsy Found, of NE Ohio v. … We made clear in Epilepsy Foundation of Northeast Ohio v.

Point Park University v. National Labor Relations Board

457 F.3d 42 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 1, 2006

GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge: In NLRB v. … Packard Motor Car Co. v.

John E. Brown v. I.T.T./Continental Baking Company And Insurance Company Of North America

921 F.2d 289 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1990

Brown appealed to the Board. 7 The Board did not address the question of whether Brown's 1983 claim for the 1981 accident was time-barred. J.A. 177. … Sec. 921 (c), renders court "unable to decide an issue not reached by the Board"); Todd Shipyards Corp. v.

Foley v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

358 A.2d 305 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 24, 1976

See, Smith v. Murphy, D.C.App., 294 A.2d 357 (1972); Hadnott v. Laird, supra; Camp v. Herzog, supra; Doe v. Martin, 404 F.Supp. 753, 763 (D.D.C.1975). … See McKart v. United States, supra, 395 U.S. at 195 , 89 S. Ct. 1657 ; Camp v. Herzog, supra, 88 U.S. App.D.C. at 374, 190 F.2d at 606 .

Rex H. Reed v. National Labor Relations Board

927 F.2d 1249 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 15, 1991

See also Getman v. NLRB, 450 F.2d 670, 680 (D.C.Cir.1971) (Excelsior lists “do not in any direct sense reveal anything about the Board’s operations”). Cf. Ray v. U.S. … Grand Lodge v.

Farmland Industries, Inc. v. Grain Board of Iraq

904 F.2d 732 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1990

See Howard University v. Best, 484 A.2d 958, 966-67 (D.C.1984); Glekas v. Boss & Phelps, Inc., 437 A.2d 584, 587 (D.C.1981); 1901 Wyoming Avenue Cooperative Ass’n v. Lee, 345 A.2d 456 , 461 n. 8 (D.C.1975). … Supply Co. v. Continental Ins.

Arc Bridges, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

861 F.3d 193 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 2017

NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 286 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). … The Board cites our opinion in Acme Die Casting, a Div. of Lovejoy Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 26 F.3d 162 (D.C.

North Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

363 F.2d 983 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 15, 1966

The Board says we have no jurisdiction because the communication sought to be reviewed is not reviewable under the rule of Mohawk Airlines, Inc. v. CAB. 6 We disagree. … United States v. American Trucking Ass’ns, 310 U.S. 534, 542-543 , 60 S.Ct. 1059 , 84 L.Ed. 1345 (1940). 6 . 117 U.S.App.D.C. 326 , 329 F.2d 894 (D. C. Cir.1964).

City of South Bend v. Surface Transportation Board

566 F.3d 1166 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 2009

Co. v. STB, 114 F.3d 206, 210 (D.C. Cir. 1997); see also Chicago & N.W. Transp. Co. v. … See Mitchell v. Christopher, 996 F.2d 375, 378 (D.C.

In Re Brown

797 A.2d 1232 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 2002

Brown was the subject of two disciplinary actions against her by the State Bar Court of California. … Brown be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for the period of five years, beginning from November 13, 2000.

Leon E. Barnum v. National Transportation Safety Board

595 F.2d 869 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 14, 1979

Wilson v. … The Board ruled that air safety and the public interest required affirmation of the 150-day suspension. In Administrator v. Whitaker, 1 N.Tran.

Riffin v. Surface Transportation Board

331 F. App'x 751 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 2009

Gorman v. NTSB, 558 F.3d 580, 586 (D.C.Cir.2009) (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted); see Clifton Power Corp. v. … Nor is it of any moment that Riffin’s petition to reopen has by now been denied by the Board. Sec Clifton Power Corp., 294 F.3d at 112 ; TeleSTAR, Inc. v. FCC, 888 F.2d 132, 134 (D.C.Cir.1989) (per curiam).

Brown v. Prince Georges County Police Department

368 F. App'x 147 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a).

Myrick v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

577 A.2d 757 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1990

Barbour v. … Citing Kenmore Joint Venture v.