Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

2.96s

  • Penk v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

    99 F.R.D. 500 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 28, 1982

    OPINION AND ORDER FRYE, District Judge: Defendant Oregon State Board of Higher Education (OSBHE) has moved this court to modify its Order of Class Certification issued October 13, 1981 and December 16, 1981 by excluding certain

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brusco Towboat Co. v. State Ex Rel. State Land Board

    30 Or. App. 509 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 17, 1977

    See, Smith Tug v. Columbia-Pac. Towing, 250 Or 612, 622 , 443 P2d 205 (1967); State Land Board v. Sause et al, 217 Or 52, 74 , 342 P2d 803 (1959); Corvallis & Eastern R. Co. v. Benson, supra; Bowlby v. … See also, Smith Tug v. Columbia-Pac. Towing, 250 Or 612 , 443 P2d 205 (1967); State Land Board v. Sause et al, 217 Or 52 , 342 P2d 803 (1959).

    Reversed on other grounds by Brusco Towboat Co. v. State Ex Rel. State Land Board, 284 Or. 627 (1978)Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Miranda v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    200 Or. App. 291 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 15, 2005

    App. 291 MIRANDA v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. Court of Appeals of Oregon. June 15, 2005. Affirmed without opinion.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Haverly v. Board of Parole

    330 Or. App. 507 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 31, 2024

    Affirmed. 508 Haverly v. Board of Parole SHORR, P. J. … Sohappy v. Board of Parole, 329 Or App 28, 540 P3d 568 (2023).

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Jones v. Maass

    106 Or. App. 42 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 1991

    Plaintiff does not allege facts that show a “further imprisonment or restraint” under the first category in Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21 , 581 P2d 934 (1978). See Fox v. Zenon, 106 Or App 37 , 806 P2d 166 (1991). … See Miller v. Maass, 95 Or App 445, 447 , 769 P2d 788 (1989). As to the other category of Penrod/Brown , plaintiff does not allege facts that, if true, require immediate judicial scrutiny.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Salem Firefighters Local 314 v. Public Employes Retirement Board

    74 Or. App. 201 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 1985

    Fire/Police Retire, v. PERB, supra, is whether the rule is a “legislative policy determination by the agency * * * that * * * is within the [statutory] delegation.” Springfield Education Assn. v. … Fire/Police Retire, v. PERB, supra, where we concluded that ORS 237.620(4) is delegative. We reject petitioners’ first assignment.

    Reversed on other grounds by Salem Firefighters Local 314 v. Public Employes Retirement Board, 300 Or. 663 (1986)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Central School District 13J v. Marion District Boundary Board

    91 Or. App. 314 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 1988

    Initial review of a boundary board order lies either in this court or before the State Board of Education, depending on the procedure under which the petition was brought. Central School (Beaman I) v. … Marion District, 88 Or App 85, 87 , 744 P2d 284 (1987) , rev den 305 Or 45 (1988); see also Central School Dist. v. State Board of Education, 91 Or App 308 , 754 P2d 923 (1988) .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Twist Architecture & Design, Inc. v. Oregon Board of Architect Examiners

    276 Or. App. 557 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 24, 2016

    We also review the board’s order for substantial reason, which requires that the board articulate a “rational connection between the facts and the *566 legal conclusion it draws from them.” Ross v. … State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 171 , 206 P3d 1042 (2009).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pugh v. Board of Parole

    336 Or. App. 790 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 11, 2024

    After the parties briefed this case, we decided Thomsen v. Board of Parole, 333 Or App 703, 554 P3d 308 (2024), and Allen v. Board of Parole, 334 Or App 447, 557 P3d 178 (2024). … Pugh v.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Pugh v. Board of Parole

    336 Or. App. 790 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 11, 2024

    After the parties briefed this case, we decided Thomsen v. Board of Parole, 333 Or App 703, 554 P3d 308 (2024), and Allen v. Board of Parole, 334 Or App 447, 557 P3d 178 (2024). … Pugh v.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. Port of Portland

    141 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 1996

    In reviewing the Board’s construction of the statute, we apply the principles of construction set out in PGE v. … ORS 174.010; Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247, 252 , 904 P2d 1071 (1995).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Oregon City Federation of Teachers v. Public Employe Relations Board

    23 Or. App. 540 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 15, 1975

    Petitioner initiated an unfair labor practice charge before the Public Employe Relations Board and now appeals from the Board’s adverse decision. … 243.650 (16). ② Under ORS 243.650(16), n 1, supra, fair-share agreements can only require payment of “the cost for services by the exclusive representative in negotiations and contract administration as determined by the board

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Culbertson v. Board of Parole

    330 Or. App. 620 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 7, 2024

    Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision A174261 Argued and submitted October 21, 2022. Marc D. Brown, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for petitioner. … Board of Parole, 329 Or App 53, 540 P3d 34 (2023) (apply- ing November 25, 2020, version); Sohappy v. Board of Parole, 329 Or App 28, 540 P3d 568 (2023) (applying April 29, 2020, version); Watson v.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Giese v. Employment Division

    27 Or. App. 929 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 1976

    v. … Neely v. Brown, 161 So2d 414 (La App 1964), and Smith v. Brown, 147 So2d 452 (La App 1962), are both cases in which off-duty conduct was held not to be work-connected.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Berns v. Berns

    125 Or. 682 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1928

    Taylor, 7 Or. 315 ; Cooke v. Cooper, 18 Or. 172 ( 22 Pac. 945 , 17 Am. St. Rep. 709 , 7 L. R. A. 273); Walter v. Calhoun, 88 Kan. 80 ( 129 Pac. 1176 ); Dyer v. Brown, 82 Ill. App. 17 . … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hood View Neighborhood Ass'n v. Board of County Commissioners

    43 Or. App. 869 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 1979

    Relying on Meeker v. … However, in 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Board of County Commissioners of Clackamas County, LCDC No. 78-036, decided June 8, 1979, after the initiation of this appeal, the amendment was invalidated.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • DeHart v. Tofte

    Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 2023

    (the School Board). … The Ban During the 2021-2022 academic year, each plaintiff served as a director on the School Board, an elected position, with plaintiff Brown as Board Chair and plaintiff Shannon as Vice-Chair.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Welo v. District School Board of School District No. 7

    24 Or. App. 443 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 17, 1976

    Our decision in Wallis v. … See also, Stroh v. SAIF, 261 Or 117, 119 , 492 P2d 472 (1972).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kammerer v. United Parcel Service

    136 Or. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 23, 1995

    Employer’s and the Board’s analyses are flawed. Injuries caused by horseplay may or may not be compensable. Brown v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Co., 105 Or App 92, 95 , 803 P2d 780 (1990), rev den 311 Or 261 (1991). … See Stark v. State Industrial AcC.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Byrns v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    241 Or. App. 657 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 2011

    Janowski /Fleming v. Board of Parole, 349 Or 432 , 245 P3d 1270 (2010).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.