Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersLA

10,000+ results

1.64s

  • Thomas v. City of Monroe Louisiana

    833 So. 2d 1282 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 2002

    He also stated the report was obtained pursuant to an established policy of reporting matters on file as a matter of public record. … As used in this Article, the following terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them below, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: (1) "Act in furtherance of a person's right of petition or free speech under the

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Conerly v. State

    858 So. 2d 636 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 2003

    The period of limitation contained in LSA-R.S. 49:112 clearly has some aspects of a peremptive period. … After reviewing the record, we cannot say the trial court's finding is manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 2002

    However, it further provides in Sec. 1-05, "General powers", that the city shall have all powers, rights, privileges, immunities and authority under the laws of the state, "including but not limited to Louisiana Revised Statutes … for it clearly states it is not limited to R.S. 33:501 -571, the statutory provisions relative to establishment and operation as a commission form of government.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Disedare v. Brumfield

    District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Oct 10, 2023

    But to overcome a defense of qualified immunity, a Plaintiff must show “that the right the official is alleged to have violated must have been ‘clearly established’ in a more particularized .. . sense: The contours of the … The proffered deposition excerpts alone do not overcome the defense of qualified immunity.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Jordan

    913 So. 2d 775 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 29, 2005

    Respondent failed to produce evidence which was clearly exculpatory and should have resolved this issue in favor of disclosure. … Judge Johnson reiterates that Rule 3.8 was established to ensure not only professional responsibility but also to ensure a criminal defendant's right to due process.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Oct 27, 1992

    Clearly under the plain meaning of § 52E(1), you qualify to run for a school board seat from District 6. … Such a candidate need only be an "elector," i.e., a duly qualified voter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Broussard v. Smith

    999 So. 2d 1171 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 2008

    Act 147 served to expand the list of defendants to co-employees (not just employers) granted immunity from suits by injured employees such that worker's compensation would be the exclusive remedy unless the intentional tort … If that is the case, there can be no point in providing the second prong of this definition as there is no behavior that would qualify under the stringent "substantially certain to result" test.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • McDaniel v. Williams

    District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Jun 30, 2022

    Concerning the second part of the qualified immunity analysis, Defendants maintain that “it is clear that Plaintiff’s constitutional right in the situation in question was not clearly established.” … Finally, Defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Graham v. ST. CHARLES GENERAL HOSP.

    590 So. 2d 818 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 1991

    It is well established that statutes of limitation are remedial in nature and as such are generally accorded retroactive application, unless such application would disturb a party's preexisting or vested right. Lott v. … As the amendment in question lengthens the applicable prescriptive period, there is clearly no disturbance of vested rights.

    Declined to follow by White v. WEST CARROLL HOSP., INC., 598 So. 2d 1134 (1992)Cited 12 timesPublished
  • J. B. McCrary Co. v. Town of Winnfield

    40 F. Supp. 427 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Aug 23, 1941

    This fundamental rule applies to a municipal corporation, subject, however, to the numerous exceptions to and immunities from the rule, established by the jur-' *431 isprudence over many decades. … “Property once dedicated to public use is extra commercia, and inalienable by seizure and sale under execution against a municipal corporation, unless it is made affirmatively and clearly to appear that its use had been abandoned

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Jones

    474 So. 2d 919 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 20, 1985

    Having been granted immunity, Mingo testified about defendant's statements and his request to dispose of the TG & Y bag. … This evidence was clearly sufficient to support the conviction.

    Cited 154 timesPublished
  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Dec 24, 2002

    As previously noted in our answer to your second question, the hospital service district's board of commissioners is clearly in charge of the district, the district's hospital and other assets, including the hospital building … To establish positions of employment and to appoint and employ personnel necessary for the operation of the health care facility or facilities under his jurisdiction to establish rates of pay; to abolish positions; and to

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Hammond City

    District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Dec 30, 2019

    that qualified immunity does not apply because he was arrested without probable cause and his arrest was objectively unreasonable in light of clearly established law.66 While conceding that it is undisputed that he … clear that qualified immunity functions as an immunity from suit, rather than a mere defense to liability.85 “[T]he qualified immunity standard ‘gives ample room for mistaken judgments’ by protecting ‘all

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Aviles v. United States

    696 F. Supp. 217 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Oct 6, 1988

    The United States, however, argues that it is immune from liability to the serviceman-plaintiff for his alleged damages. … The Coast Guard, though not within the Department of Defense, is clearly a "military service.” 14 U.S.C. § 1 ; United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cambre

    District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Nov 6, 2025

    During the July 29, 2025 status conference, Judgment arguing that the Defendants were entitled to Qualified Immunity on Plaintiff’s 1983 Claims of Excessive Force as well as Plaintiff’s state law claims of battery and … was clearly established at the time of the challenged conduct.8 The Court’s Order and Reasons specifically addressed Plaintiff’s §1983 excessive force claim as well as Plaintiff’s state law claims.9 Because of the

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Parker v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections

    District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Jul 29, 2020

    “That is a necessary part of the qualified-immunity standard[.]” Id. … By the same reasoning, Acklin is not entitled to qualified immunity here.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brumlow v. Shreveport

    District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Sep 25, 2025

    The Court dismissed Brumlow’s false arrest claim against Deputy Ukpabi based on qualified immunity. Unlike individual officers, sheriff’s departments are not entitled to qualified immunity. … However, Sheriff Richardson in his official capacity is not entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hughes Realty Company v. Pfister

    245 So. 2d 757 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 8, 1971

    Co., [5] the court allowed a reconventional demand against an assignor where it was clearly established that the assignment to the plaintiff-assignee was confected for the sole purpose of avoiding the defendant's counterclaim … Atlas Cordage Co., [6] the Supreme Court allowed a reconventional demand against a nonresident not a party to the suit where it was clearly established that the plaintiff who sued in his individual name sued in reality only

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hardy v. Ducote

    246 F. Supp. 2d 509 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jan 20, 2003

    Elsbury stated the plant safety, maintenance, and operations responsibility were delegated to properly trained and qualified supervisors. … Plaintiffs allege the following reasons why Du-cote is not immune from liability: (1) plaintiffs worked as independent contractors, not employees; (2) the case law establishes that occupational diseases are presumptively

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Parker v. Town of Woodworth

    14 La.App. 3 Cir. 943 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 2015

    And the inquiry is not as forgiving as the one employed in the distinct context of deciding whether an officer is entitled to qualified immunity for a constitutional or statutory violation. … The basis of the Town of Woodworth’s liability as Godwin’s employer is clearly established in the record.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.