Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

1.51s

  • Marsh v. Boring Furs, Inc.

    275 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1976

    Judgment affirmed. 1 Dean Vincent, Inc. v. Redisco, Inc., 232 Or 170 , 373 P2d 995 (1962); State Highway Comm. v. … Freeman, 2 W & S (Pa) 116, 37 Am Dec 490 (1841); Messenger Publishing Co. v. Board of Property Assessment, 183 Pa Super 407, 132 A2d 768 (1957). 5 Brown on Personal Property, § 16.2, p. 537.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Sandersfeld v. Oregon State Board of Parole

    25 Or. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 26, 1976

    Petitioner alleges that the Board’s written decision does not meet the requirements of ORS 144.343(7) interpreted in accordance with the due process requirements announced in Morrissey v. … *.’ ” Morrissey v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Twist Architecture & Design, Inc. v. Oregon Board of Architect Examiners

    276 Or. App. 557 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 24, 2016

    We also review the board’s order for substantial reason, which requires that the board articulate a “rational connection between the facts and the *566 legal conclusion it draws from them.” Ross v. … State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 171 , 206 P3d 1042 (2009).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • DeWolfe v. Clackamas County Board of Commissioners

    66 Or. App. 580 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 18, 1984

    PER CURIAM In these consolidated appeals, petitioner seeks review of the Land Use Board of Appeals’ (LUBA) order affirming the Clackamas County Board of Commissioners’ (Board) decision to grant a building permit to Jones. … We also defer to the Board’s interpretation of its own zoning ordinance, Cascade Broadcasting Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sather v. Saif Corp.

    272 Or. App. 263 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 2015

    Sather v. … See Brown v. SAIF, 262 Or App 640, 645-56 , 325 P3d 834 , rev allowed, 356 Or 397 (2014) (so holding). Therefore, we reverse and remand this case to the board to make that determination.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stoddard v. District School Board for School District No. 91

    140 Or. 203 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1932

    E. 1037 ) ; Hampton v. Board of Education, 195 N. C. 213 ( 141 S. E. 744 ). … The board was bound by the decision of the county school superintendent thereupon: Jackson v. Steamboat Rock Ind. Sch. Dist., 110 Iowa 313 (81 N. W. *222 596); Town of Pearsall v. Woolls, 50 S. W. 959 ; Powell v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Culbertson v. Board of Parole

    330 Or. App. 620 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 7, 2024

    Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision A174261 Argued and submitted October 21, 2022. Marc D. Brown, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for petitioner. … Board of Parole, 329 Or App 53, 540 P3d 34 (2023) (apply- ing November 25, 2020, version); Sohappy v. Board of Parole, 329 Or App 28, 540 P3d 568 (2023) (applying April 29, 2020, version); Watson v.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Solberg v. TICE ELECTRIC

    212 Or. App. 430 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 2, 2007

    The board’s finding is supported by substantial evidence. Compare Johnsen v. … v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Builders Board

    63 Or. App. 127 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 11, 1983

    However, after the Board issued its final orders, petitioners joined in a suit for declaratory relief in the United States District Court, Dependable Insurance Co., et al v. The Builders Board (D. Or. … Fidelity Fire Insurance Company v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Messer v. Polk County District Boundary Board

    65 Or. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 1983

    In Messer v. Polk Co. Dist. … In another context, the Supreme Court has defined “solely” as “ ‘[e]xclusively, to the exclusion of other purposes, persons, etc. * * *’” Bergsvik v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Fraley v. Deschutes County Board of Commissioners

    151 Or. App. 201 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 19, 1997

    In Simon v. Board of Co. … That question arose in Edney v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bartel v. State Board of Higher Education

    30 Or. App. 849 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 29, 1977

    ORS 28.020; Vendrell v. School District No. 26C et al, 226 Or 263 , 360 P2d 282 (1961).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tricker v. Oregon State Board of Parole

    305 Or. 344 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1988

    *345 MEMORANDUM OPINION The Court of Appeals in State v. … See Wilson v. Board of Parole, 304 Or 480 , 747 P2d 976 (1987). The Board Action Form of May 12, 1986, states that Tricker’s sentence began on April 3, 1978.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McEwen v. Clackamas County Board of Commissioners

    33 Or. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 3, 1978

    Church v. Clackamas Co., 32 Or App 3, 13 , 573 P2d 726 (1978). … Plaintiffs elected to abide by the procedure utilized by the Board and cannot now be heard to complain of it. See Green v. City of Eugene, 22 Or App 231 , 538 P2d 368 (1975). Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Emery v. Adjustco

    82 Or. App. 101 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 29, 1986

    As in Brown, the pre-order report is part of the record for our consideration. ORS 656.268(2); Brown v. Jeld-Wen, Inc., supra n 1, 52 Or App at 194 n 1. … SAIF, 77 Or App 640 , 713 P2d 1083 , rev den 301 Or 240 (1986); Alvarez v. GAB Business Services, 72 Or App 524 , 696 P2d 1131 (1985); Maarefi v. SAIF, 69 Or App 527 , 686 P2d 1055 (1984); Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Land Board v. General Construction Co.

    2 Or. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 5, 1970

    See Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, 325 US 761 , 65 S Ct 1515 , 89 L Ed 1915 (1945); Montgomery v. Portland, 190 US 89 , 23 S Ct 735 , 47 L Ed 965 (1903); Cummings v. … We do not find the requisites for levying interest as approved in Abrams v. Rushlight, supra. Defendant cites Camas Logging Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Lane County

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 21, 2022

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 7 (1992).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jones v. Oregon State Board of Parole

    20 Or. App. 712 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 31, 1975

    The state concedes that the Board of Parole failed to comply with the requirements of Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 US 471 , 92 S Ct 2593 , 33 L Ed 2d 484 (1972), as interpreted in Waltz v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Portland Yacht Club v. State Land Board

    249 Or. 633 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1968

    State v. Imlah et al, 1931, 135 Or 66 , 294 P 1046 . If Clarks’ evidence is the more persuasive, this decree must be affirmed. … Strasbaugh v. Babler Bros, et al, 1960, 220 Or 35, 39 , 348 P2d 448 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Penk v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

    99 F.R.D. 500 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 28, 1982

    OPINION AND ORDER FRYE, District Judge: Defendant Oregon State Board of Higher Education (OSBHE) has moved this court to modify its Order of Class Certification issued October 13, 1981 and December 16, 1981 by excluding certain

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.