Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Capital Transit Company

221 F.2d 864 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 17, 1955

Board’s Brief, p. 24. 15 . Board’s Brief, pp. 23, 24. 16 . Democrat Printing Co. v. Federal Communications Comm., 1952, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 72, 78 , 202 F.2d 298, 303 , and cases there cited. 17 . … Securities and Exchange Comm. v. Chenery Corp., 1943, 318 U.S. 80, 87 , 63 S.Ct. 454, 459 , 87 L.Ed. 626 . 18 . Id., 318 U.S. at page 88 , 63 S.Ct. at page 459 . 19 . National Labor Relations Board v.

Abbott Ambulance v. National Labor Relations Board

522 F.3d 447 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 2008

Ceramics, Inc. v. NLRB, 310 F.3d 778, 783 (D.C. Cir. 2002); NLRB v. Res-Care, Inc., 705 F.2d 1461, 1471 (7th Cir. 1983). But what is the status, on election day, of someone who has been laid off or is on sick leave? … See Cavert Acquisition Co. v. NLRB, 83 F.3d 598, 606 (3d Cir. 1996); Newly Weds Foods, Inc., 758 F.2d at 7-8. The Board’s application of the standard in this case supported its result.

Fedex Home Delivery v. National Labor Relations Board

563 F.3d 492 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 21, 2009

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. Opinion dissenting in part filed by Cii'cuit Judge GARLAND. BROWN, Circuit Judge: FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. … See Kisner v.

Brown v. Government of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2017

Brown, 115 F. Supp. 3d at 65 n.2 (citing Defs.’ Suppl. Filing, Simms v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 12–cv–00701, at *2 (D.D.C. June 22, 2012)). … See, e.g., Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 146 F.R.D. 1, 5 (D.D.C. 1992) (noting that plaintiffs relied on a “simple, common formula” to measure damages for each class member); see also Windham v. Am.

Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

254 F.2d 90 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 1958

It is plain that in this statute Congress contemplated an adjudicatory proceeding and conferred upon the Board in this respect quasi-judicial functions. … The order is vacated and the case remanded to the Board for reconsideration. 1 . Now 26 U.S.C.A. § 168 . 2 .

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

473 F.2d 91 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 24, 1972

Bannercraft Clothing Co., Inc. v. The Renegotiation Board, 151 U. S.App.D.C. 174, 466 F.2d 345 (decided July 6, 1972). … While Myers v.

Spurlino Materials, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

805 F.3d 1131 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 13, 2015

Like the Board, we find that the partial-strike precedents are a poor fit for the case before us. See Pacific Coast Supply, LLC v. NLRB, 801 F.3d 321, 333 (D.C. … See Vencare Ancillary Servs., Inc. v.

District of Columbia v. Merit Systems Protection Board

762 F.2d 129 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 21, 1985

United Mine Workers v. … Noxell Corp. v.

Gruma Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

200 F. App'x 4 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 6, 2006

This cause was considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board, and was briefed and argued by the parties. … It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied and the Board’s cross-application to enforce its order be granted.

Brooks v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

317 A.2d 864 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1974

See Williams v. Zuckert, 372 U.S. 765 , 83 S.Ct. 1102 , 10 L. Ed. 136 (1963) (per curiam). See also Goldwasser v. … Brown, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 222 , 417 F.2d 1169 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 918 , 25 L.Ed.2d 103 (1970). Petitioner’s final claim of error is that Dr.

David S. Komjathy v. National Transportation Safety Board

832 F.2d 1294 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 13, 1987

. § 1429(a) (1982), Komjathy appealed the order to the National Transportation Safety Board (“NTSB” or “Board”), appellee here. … See, e.g., Go Leasing, Inc. v. NTSB, 800 F.2d 1514, 1519-21 (9th Cir.1986); Pangbum v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 311 F.2d 349, 354-56 (1st Cir.1962).

Alwin Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

192 F.3d 133 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 28, 1999

NLRB v. Alwin Mfg. … v.

Lange v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

407 A.2d 1058 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1979

See Bernstein v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra; Hauser v. Borough of Catasauqua Zoning Hearing Board, 20 Pa.Cmwlth. 313, 315-17 , 341 A.2d 566, 569-70 (1975). … Accordingly, we affirm the Order of the Board. See SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 88 , 63 S.Ct. 454 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943); Silverstone v.

Levelle, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

924 A.2d 1030 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 17, 2007

See Am- Chi Restaurant v. Simonson, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 37, 38-39 , 396 F.2d 686, 687-88 (1968); 4934; Inc. v. … Williams v. Robinson, 139 U.S.App. D.C. 204, 209, 432 F.2d 637, 642 (1970) (footnote omitted); see also Cohen v. Rental Hous.

Howard Symons v. Chrysler Corporation Loan Guarantee Board

670 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 4, 1981

Hunt v. … See, e.g., Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Department of HEW, 668 F.2d 537 (D.C.Cir.1981); Forsham v. Califano, 587 F.2d 1128 (D.C.Cir.1978), aff’d sub nom., Forsham v.

Exxel/atmos, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

28 F.3d 1243 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 15, 1994

Finally, we owe particular deference to the Board’s choice of remedy. See NLRB v. … See Brooks v.

Petrochem Insulation, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

240 F.3d 26 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 26, 2001

The Board rejected this argument, relying on DeBartolo Corp. v. Fla. Gulf Coast Bldg. & Constr. … --the Board relied on Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v.

Aerovox Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

211 F.2d 640 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 17, 1954

This is a petition to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board. … That matter was decided adversely to the company’s contention in Farmer v. United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers. 1 The order of the Board will be affirmed and an order of enforcement entered.

White v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

537 A.2d 1133 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1988

Glenwood Cemetery v. District of Columbia Zoning Comm’n, 448 A.2d 241, 241-42 (D.C.1982) (per curiam); Moore v. Board of Elections for the District of Columbia, 325 A.2d 452, 454 (D.C.1974) (per curiam). … Thus, the question is whether the Board provided notice reasonably calculated to apprise petitioner of the date when the Board certified the election results. 2 Ploufe v.

Tradesmen International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

275 F.3d 1137 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 15, 2002

Associa- tion of Civilian Technicians v. FLRA, 269 F.3d 1112, 1117 (D.C. Cir. 2001); see also, Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. … The Board also relied on the Ninth Circuit's decision in Kaiser Engineers v.