Case law

Gray v. Oregon State Board of Parole

71 Or. App. 757 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 23, 1985

State v. Nelson, 246 Or 321, 325 , 424 P2d 223 , cert denied 389 US 964 (1967). … We rejected a similar argument in State v.

Johnson v. Clackamas County Board of Commissioners

57 Or. App. 482 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 26, 1982

and supporting brief were due on June 11, 1981, before our decision in Gordon v. … Accordingly, petitioners here are in the same posture as were those in Gordon , and the case is controlled by the Supreme Court’s decision on review, Gordon v.

Becker v. Malheur County

24 Or. 217 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1893

, every presumption exists in favor of the regularity of its proceedings after it has once acquired jurisdiction: Thompson v. … Multnomah County, 2 Or. 34 ; Brown, Jurisdiction, § 20; Cent. Pac. R. R. Co. v. Placer County, 32 Cal. 582 .

Vann v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

340 Or. 673 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 23, 2006

136 P.3d 743 (2006) 340 Or. 673 VANN v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION No. S53268. OREGON SUPREME COURT. May 23, 2006. Petition for review denied.

Brown Trust v. Clackamas County, Tc-Md 091161d (or.tax 10-8-2009)

Oregon Tax Court · Oct 8, 2009

Sandersfeld v. Oregon State Board of Parole

25 Or. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 26, 1976

Petitioner alleges that the Board’s written decision does not meet the requirements of ORS 144.343(7) interpreted in accordance with the due process requirements announced in Morrissey v. … *.’ ” Morrissey v.

Ambrose v. Board of Education of School District 17-C

51 Or. App. 621 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 13, 1981

Wallis v. Crook County School Dist., 13 Or App 174 , 509 P2d 44 (1973); Welo v. Dist. Sch. Bd., Dist. No. 7, 24 Or App 443 , 545 P2d 921 (1976). … The requirement of written notice is not waived by the employee’s actual knowledge of the board’s decision not to renew. Welo v. Dist. Sch. Bd., Dist. No. 7, supra.

Complying Status of Flyways, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Board

33 Or. App. 233 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 13, 1978

Carson v. State Indus. Acc. Comm., 152 Or 455 , 54 P2d 109 (1936).

Bahrenfus v. Bachik

106 Or. App. 46 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 1991

That, they claim, puts them in the first category in Penrod/Brown v. … Unlike the plaintiffs’ allegations in Bedell v. Schiedler, supra, Fox v. Zenon, 106 Or App 37 , 806 P2d 166 (1991), and Moore v.

Marsh v. Boring Furs, Inc.

275 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1976

Judgment affirmed. 1 Dean Vincent, Inc. v. Redisco, Inc., 232 Or 170 , 373 P2d 995 (1962); State Highway Comm. v. … Freeman, 2 W & S (Pa) 116, 37 Am Dec 490 (1841); Messenger Publishing Co. v. Board of Property Assessment, 183 Pa Super 407, 132 A2d 768 (1957). 5 Brown on Personal Property, § 16.2, p. 537.

Saif Corp. v. Carlos-Macias (In re Comp. of Carlos-Macias)

290 Or. App. 801 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 21, 2018

We also held, citing our opinion in Brown v. SAIF , 262 Or. … Brown II , 361 Or. at 273 , 391 P.3d 773 . An example of that link that the court discussed in Brown II is SAIF v.

Penk v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

99 F.R.D. 508 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 10, 1982

Particularly persuasive is the remand of Brown v. Eckard Drugs, 663 F.2d 1268 (4th Cir.1981) for reconsideration in light of Falcon . … The remand of Brown indicates that this analysis is no longer valid.

Beebe v. Pacific Realty Trust

578 F. Supp. 1128 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 12, 1984

Brown & Sons ... advised the' Board of Trustees that the $37 cash price was grossly inadequate from a financial/ point of view .... … Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v.

Stogsdill v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

204 Or. App. 779 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 15, 2006

App. 779 STOGSDILL v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION Oregon Court of Appeals. March 15, 2006. Case affirmed without opinion.

Jackson v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

202 Or. App. 672 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 2005

App. 672 JACKSON v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. Oregon Court of Appeals. November 16, 2005. Case affirmed without opinion.

Brown v. Lane County

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 21, 2023

Comm'rs. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). … Velez intended to inflict severe emotional distress on Brown.” Id. Ex. 1 ¶ 34a.

State Ex Rel. Fraley v. Deschutes County Board of Commissioners

151 Or. App. 201 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 19, 1997

In Simon v. Board of Co. … That question arose in Edney v.

Moro v. State of Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 10, 2015

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD; Ellen Rosenblum, Attorney General; and Kate Brown, Governor, Respondents. … PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, State of Oregon; and Kate Brown, Governor, State of Oregon, Respondents.

Strong v. Kamm

13 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1886

Brown, of $464.42 to-Moore, Stevens, & Brother, cash paid S. W. Brown, as to-its being a charge to Brown for that sum, according to-his system of book-keeping. … (Baker v. Elgin, 11 Or. 334 .) But that question was not in the case.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Brown

277 Or. 121 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1977

On April 21, 1976, the Review Board concurred in the Trial Board’s findings of guilt and also found the accused guilty of "all” charges in the complaint. … Brown made a full disclosure to the employees of the Trust Department of the Bank concerning the business relationships of Brown and the deceased Jacobson, including the $3,000 balance on the $10,000 note, which is in evidence