Case law

Miranda v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

342 Or. 633 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 2007

157 P.3d 788 (2007) 342 Or. 633 MIRANDA v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. S52794. Supreme Court of Oregon. April 10, 2007. Petition for review denied.

Nichols v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

342 Or. 633 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 2007

157 P.3d 788 (2007) 342 Or. 633 NICHOLS v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. S53055. Supreme Court of Oregon. April 10, 2007. Petition for review denied.

Houff v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

340 Or. 483 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 2006

135 P.3d 318 (2006) 340 Or. 483 HOUFF v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. S53273. OREGON SUPREME COURT. April 25, 2006. Petition for review denied.

Brown v. Lane County

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 12, 2024

See Getchell v. … Cleland v. Wilcox, 273 Ore. 883, 887, 543 P.2d 1032 (1975); Sims v. Dixon, 224 Ore. 45, 48, 355 P.2d 478 (1960); see also Henderson v. U. P. R. R.

Sieg v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

194 Or. App. 329 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 30, 2004

95 P.3d 757 (2004) 194 Or.App. 329 SIEG v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION A117500. Court of Appeals of Oregon. July 30, 2004. Affirmed from the bench.

Mendacino v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

207 Or. App. 436 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 23, 2006

App. 436 MENDACINO v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. OREGON COURT OF APPEALS. August 23, 2006. Case affirmed without opinion.

Robles v. SAIF Corp. (In re Robles)

291 Or. App. 458 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 25, 2018

SAIF , 362 Or. 38 , 403 P.3d 776 (2017), affirming the board's order with a citation to Brown v. SAIF , 361 Or. 241 , 391 P.3d 773 (2017). Robles v. SAIF , 289 Or. App. 441 , 407 P.3d 981 (2017). … In our original per curiam opinion citing Brown , we overlooked the fact that the second issue is not resolved by Brown .

Committee of One Thousand to Re-Elect State Senator Brown v. Eivers

296 Or. 195 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1983

Thornton v. Johnson, 253 Or 342, 362 , 453 P2d 178 , 454 P2d 647 (1969); Mosee v. Clark, 253 Or 83, 87 , 453 P2d 176 (1969). … This court in Mosee v.

V. L. Y. v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

338 Or. 44 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 2005

A majority of the Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, agreed with the board’s theory and affirmed. 4 V. L. Y. v. Board of Parole, 188 Or App 617 , 72 P3d 993 (2003). … ’ ” V".

Rystedt v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

235 Or. App. 366 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 19, 2010

Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision Andy Simrin filed the opening brief for petitioner.

Gilbertson v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

342 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 2006

149 P.3d 138 (2006) 342 Or. 116 GILBERTSON v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION No. S52962. Oregon Supreme Court. December 5, 2006 Petition for review denied.

Ortiz v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

209 Or. App. 378 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 22, 2006

App. 378 ORTIZ v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. Court of Appeals of Oregon. November 22, 2006. Case affirmed without opinion.

Gehring v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

209 Or. App. 378 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 22, 2006

App. 378 GEHRING v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. Court of Appeals of Oregon. November 22, 2006. Case affirmed without opinion.

Reynolds v. State Board of Naturopathic Examiners

95 Or. App. 105 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 1989

In Reynolds v. … State Board of Naturopathic Exam., 80 Or App 438, 441 , 722 P2d 739 (1986) (Reynolds I), we held that, because the complaint presents a justiciable controversy, the court could not dismiss the action for failure to state

Byrnes v. Oregon State Board of Parole

89 Or. App. 575 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 24, 1988

Anderson v. Board of Parole, 303 Or 618, 627 , 740 P2d 760 (1987). … If the Board takes action which would be adverse to the prisoner, the Board shall reopen the hearing. “(6) The Board shall state the specific reasons for denial of a request to reopen a hearing.”

White v. Oregon State Board of Parole

89 Or. App. 302 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 27, 1988

Petitioner first contends, and the state concedes, that the Board erred in overriding two of the minimum sentences and sustaining the remaining four. We agree. OAR 255-35-022; Roof v. … Board of Parole, 85 Or App 188, 191 , 736 P2d 193 (1987). We therefore reverse the order and remand to the Board to reset petitioner’s release date, applying the provisions of OAR 255-35-022(2). Roof v.

State Ex Rel. Brown v. Union High School District No. 7

161 Or. 410 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1939

Will v. District Boundary Board, 141 Or. 54 , 16 P. (2d) 24 . We think that the statute fixing the time for filing such petitions is directory rather than mandatory. … Mort v. Tralstead, 35 S. D. 568, 572, 156 N.

E. Max Woodbury II v. CH2M Hill, Inc.

173 Or. App. 171 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 21, 2001

Miller v. Georgia Pacific, 294 Or 750, 753 , 662 P2d 718 (1983). … Wilson v. P.G.E. Company, 252 Or 385, 390-92 , 448 P2d 562 (1968); Brown v. Boise-Cascade Corp., 150 Or App 391, 396 , 946 P2d 324 (1997), rev den 327 Or 317 (1998).

Citizens' Utility Board v. Public Utility Commission

157 Or. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1998

Petitioners O’Neil, Marbet and Utility Reform Project (collectively petitioners) were among the prevailing parties in Citizens’ Utility Board v. … See generally State Land Board v. Sovenko et al, 202 Or 571, 574-81 , 277 P2d 781 (1954).

Griffin v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

339 Or. 610 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 2005

127 P.3d 651 (2005) 339 Or. 610 GRIFFIN v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. S52841. Oregon Supreme Court. December 13, 2005. Petition for review denied.