Case law

Solenberg v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety

65 O.B.A.J. 1205 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1993

For general support, Solenberg contends this court’s holding in Browning v. State, 812 P.2d 1372 (Okl.App.1991), is indistinguishable. We disagree. … In Browning the driver’s demurrer put in issue the “very existence” of the rules and regulations promulgated by the Board of Tests for Alcohol and Drug Influence for administration of breath-alcohol tests.

Tyler ex rel. Tyler v. Board of County Commissioners

67 O.B.A.J. 1608 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1996

County responds by citing Johns v. Wynnewood School Board of Education, 656 P.2d 248 (OMa.1982). … The Oklahoma Supreme Court has recently decided the ease of Cruse v. Board of County Commissioners of Atoka County, Oklahoma, 910 P.2d 998 (OMa.1995) dealing with the application of another general statute to the Act.

Board of Ed. v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 72

113 Okla. 216 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1925

This action was begun in the district court of Carter county, Okla., by consolidated school district No. 72, Carter county, Okla., against the board of education of the city of Wilson (school district No. 43 independent). … An appeal was taken to the board of county commissioners of Carter county, who affirmed the action of the county superintendent.

STATE EX REL. BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. Lawton

523 P.2d 1064 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1974

We agree with the Colorado court which, after citing numerous authorities from various jurisdictions, in Colorado State Board of Optometric Examiners v. … Lawton under Senate Bill 173 the Board would bear the burden of proving that inducement does not in fact occur by his proximity to Lee Optical.” The Board relies on Williamson v.

Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v. Baker

638 P.2d 464 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1981

In Board of Regents of Higher Education v. … Regents of Univ. of Neb. v.

Tulsa County Excise Board v. Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co.

180 Okla. 287 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1937

Co. v. Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. (2d) 274 . … Co. v. Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. (2d) 274 . School district No. 26 had a valuation less than fifty million dollars. It had a town within its bounds, but no levy w'as made for the town.

Fanning v. Board of Ed. of City of Tulsa

140 Okla. 252 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1929

In support of such argument, the plaintiff cites the case of Dove v. … Such rule is likewise set forth in Goldsmith v. City of Ardmore, 136 Okla. 201 , 277 Pac. 230 ; Simms v. Smith, 136 Okla. 144 , 276 Pac. 740 ; Teter v.

Polk v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety

67 O.B.A.J. 3450 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 16, 1996

See Browning v. State ex rel. … The evidentiary requirement in Browning applies with equal force to evidence proffered by an individual opposing revocation of his driving privileges.

White v. Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County

267 P.2d 579 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1954

As applicable to the question of the construction of the statutes .here .involved the plaintiffs cite, a rule stated in-the case of Gardner v. School Dist. … J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and CORN, DAVISON, O’NEAL and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur. WILLIAMS, J., dissents.

Board of Com'rs of Craig County v. Germo Mfg. Co.

71 Okla. 237 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1918

Kingfisher County v. Graham, 40 Okla. 571 , 139 Pac. 1149 . In Commissioners, etc., v. Stoddard, 13 Kan. 208 , the district judge directed the sheriff to buy certain matting for the courtroom. … The board of county commissioners disallowed the claim, and the claimant appealed to the district court, where judgment was giv-in his favor.

News-Dispatch Printing & Audit Co. v. Board of Com'rs

130 Okla. 152 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1927

A. 499 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Travelers Ins. Co., 128 Fed. 817 , 63 C. C. A. 467 ; Hirt v. City of Erie (Pa.) 49 Atl. 467 ; City of Mitchell v. Scmith, City Auditor (S. D.) 80 N. … W. 1077 ; Opinion of the Justices (Me.) 18 Atl. 291 ; Board of Com’rs Lake Co. v. Platt, 79 Fed. 567 , 25 C. C. A. 87 ; McQuillin, Municipal Corp. (1913 Ed.) sec. 2226, citing State ex rel. v.

Board of Com'rs v. District Court of Wagoner County

200 Okla. 590 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1948

Mays v. … In Morton v.

Awad v. Ziriax

754 F. Supp. 2d 1298 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 29, 2010

See Agenda for Oklahoma State Election Board Meeting, plaintiffs hearing Exhibit 7. … V.

Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County Excise Board

200 Okla. 679 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1948

contemplate such computation by a county excise board or that such information as is necessary in making such com- ■ putation will necessarily be compiled ' and available to the county board at ' the time such board is required … each 'governing board files its request for appropriations.

Linn v. Board of Education of City of Chickasha

40 Okla. 742 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 26, 1914

Linn, filed his motion and prayed a writ of mandamus in the district court of Grady county, h> require the defendants, the board of education of Ghickasha, a city of the first class, to recognize him as a member thereof. … The answer admits that the board had refused so to do, and further, that plaintiff was elected one of the five members thereof in 1913 to serve for two years, pursuant to Comp.

Excise Board v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

180 Okla. 626 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1937

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review by the excise board of Blaine county, hereinafter referred to as protestee. … BAYLESS, V. C. J., and RILEY, PHELPS, and GIBSON, JJ., absent.

Brown v. Ludi-Leitch

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 24, 2020

Brown v. Eppler, 725 F.3d 1221, 1230 (10th Cir. 2013). … Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972).

Staley v. Board of County Com'rs of Muskogee County

72 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1919

Thereafter Staley duly presented bis claim for tbe full amount of tbe penalties authorized for making tbe arbitrary assessments to the board of county commissioners, which claim tbe board disallowed. … The matter was one in which the board was not concerned, and, though the agreement had been proved, it would have constituted no defense.

Carter v. Board of Review Under Oklahoma Employment Security Act

323 P.2d 362 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1958

Claimants admit the pertinence of the case of Jones v. … J., CORN, V. C. J, and DAVISON, HALLEY, JOHNSON, JACKSON and CARLILE, JJ., concur.

Roberts v. Board of Education

168 Okla. 414 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1934

State Election Board, 121 Okla. 119 , 248 P. 642 ; Board of Commissioners of Creek County v. Alexander, 58 Okla. 128 , 159 P. 311 . … Haskell v. Edmonds, 90 Okla. 44 , 215 P. 629 ; Brown v. Miller, 89 Okla. 287 , 215 P. 748 .