Case law

OJO v. HUDSON COUNTY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 23, 2021

(Ojo v. Decker, Civ. No. 20-5538, D.E. 14.) … Pa. 2013) (noting that although this standard typically applies to municipal entities, it “applies with equal force to supervisory liability claims premised on a ‘policy, practice, or custom’ theory” (citing Brown v.

Morris County Welfare Board v. Gilligan

130 N.J.L. 83 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 29, 1943

Under R. 8. 44:7-19, the Welfare Board may bring appropriate actions, but Mrs. … Kiser v. Overseer of Poor, 3 N. J. L. *410; Ackerman v. Ackerman, 55 Id. 422.

Ehehalt v. Livingston Board of Education

147 N.J. Super. 511 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 17, 1977

Super. 511 (1977) 371 A.2d 752 CALVIN EHEHALT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. LIVINGSTON BOARD OF EDUCATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted February 8, 1977. … His separate calling is not an integral part of respondent's regular function as a school board.

Palmer v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

77 N.J.L. 143 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 1908

Westcott v. Danzenbaker, 1 Halst. 132; Van Dyke v. Bastedo, 3 Gr. 224 ; Godfrey v. Myers, 3 Zab. 197; Hess v. Cole, Id. 116; National Docks Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 7 Dick. Ch. Rep. 58; Podesta v. … Holmes, 123 Ind. 525 ), which is fatal to the objection that in actions against boards of freeholders the statute does not permit a declaration to be served with the summons.

Lowenstein v. Newark Board of Education

33 N.J. 277 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 18, 1960

Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U. S. 232, 246, 77 S. Ct. 752 , 1 L. Ed. 2d 796, 805-806 (1957). … As was so well said by Justice Heher in Thorp v. Board of Trustees of Schools for Industrial Education, 6 N.

K.L. v. Evesham Township Board of Education

423 N.J. Super. 337 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 12, 2011

Accord Roe v. … Its provisions are not applicable to the Board’s actions in this case. See Cruz v.

Board of Education v. Township Committee

187 N.J. Super. 540 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 1983

It is clear that a board has an obligation to account for surplus funds and investment income in planning its budget for the ensuing year. Cf. Fair Lawn Bd. of Ed. v. … Its action is, of course, subject to review by the Commissioner and by the State Board for “procedural or substantive arbitrariness.’’ East Brunswick Tp. Bd. of Ed. v.

Redcay v. State Board of Education

131 N.J.L. 326 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 23, 1944

Ferraro v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

228 N.J. Super. 33 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 1988

Plaintiffs obviously assumed that Holmdel had retained the power to zone and therefore applied for a variance before the Holmdel Board of Adjustment. … Therefore, under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70, a variance would be heard by the board of adjustment of the supervising municipality, rather than that of the municipality where the property was located.

Jamgochian v. New Jersey State Parole Board

196 N.J. 222 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 6, 2008

Sanchez v. N.J. … State v.

BLACK-MELONE v. Board of Review

200 N.J. 547 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 2009

985 A.2d 647 (2009) 200 N.J. 547 BLACK-MELONE v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND VERIZON. No. C-480 September Term 2009, 64458 Supreme Court of New Jersey. December 16, 2009. Petition for Certification Denied.

Allen v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

71 N.J.L. 247 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 13, 1904

MacFall v. Mayor, &c., of Dover, 41 Vroom 518 , and cases cited. … As this act seems merely to effect a change *249 in the personnel of the board, and not to establish a new corporation, the reasons that moved this court to order a dismissal of the writ in Bowlby v.

State ex rel. Board of Health of Hackensack v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

46 N.J. Eq. 173 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1889

Pitney, V. C. … In this they relied upon and followed the case of The Board of Health of Trenton v. Hutchinson, 12 Stew. Eq. 218, as a precedent. That suit was based upon the statute of March 22d, 1883 (P. L. p. 119).

OJO v. CORECIVIC, INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 24, 2021

(Ojo v. Decker, Civ. No. 20-5538, D.E. 14.) … Pa. 2013) (noting that although this standard typically applies to municipal entities, it “applies with equal force to supervisory liability claims premised on a ‘policy, practice, or custom’ theory” (citing Brown v.

Johnston v. Board of Adjustment, Westfield

118 N.J.L. 298 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 4, 1937

While the title of the petition names the board of adjustment and the town council of Westfield as parties respondents, the body of the petition carries no allegations to sustain the title.

State ex rel. Board of Health v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen

48 N.J. Eq. 294 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1891

For affirmance — The Ci-iiep-Justice, Depue, Diícon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Smith, Whitaker — 11. For reversal — None.

OJO v. ESSEX COUNTY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 23, 2021

(Ojo v. Decker, Civ. No. 20-5538, D.E. 14.) … Pa. 2013) (noting that although this standard typically applies to municipal entities, it “applies with equal force to supervisory liability claims premised on a ‘policy, practice, or custom’ theory” (citing Brown v.

Clarke v. HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD

198 N.J. 473 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 27, 2009

968 A.2d 1190 (2009) 198 N.J. 473 CLARKE v. HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD. C-748 September Term 2008, 63,735 Supreme Court of New Jersey. March 27, 2009. Petition for certification. Denied.

Highpoint, Inc. v. Bloomfield Planning Board

87 N.J. Super. 58 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 1964

Super. 58 (1964) 208 A.2d 149 HIGHPOINT, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BLOOMFIELD PLANNING BOARD, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Handlon v. Town of Belleville, 4 N.J. 99, 107 (1950). See also Virginia Construction Corp. v. Fairman, 39 N.J. 61 (1962).

Von Ouhl v. Board of Review

254 N.J. Super. 147 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 25, 1992

N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(l); see Lowden v. Board of Review, 78 N.J.Super. 467 , 189 A. 2d 224 (App.Div.1963). … jurisdiction upon the Board to review any other part. 11 N.J.Super. at 328 , 78 A.2d 306 ; compare Ludwigsen v.