Case law

State v. Bean

159 Me. 455 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 21, 1963

Reaching a like result upon the same reasoning Savoid v. District of Columbia, (1961) 288 F. (2nd) 851, 110 U. S. App. D. C. 39; Auditor General v. Olezniczak, (1942) 302 Mich. 336 , 4 N. … S. 1871, Ch. 1, Sec. 3) the court in Maine v.

City of Old Town v. Dimoulas

803 A.2d 1018 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 9, 2002

Chongris v. *1025 Board of Appeals of the Town of Andover, 811 F.2d 36, 40 (1st Cir.1987). … See Gorham v. Town of Cape Elizabeth, 625 A.2d 898, 902 (Me.1993) (applicant to an administrative board is entitled to a fair and unbiased hearing).

Doe v. School Administrative District No. 19

66 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 31, 1999

See Davis v. Monroe Cty. Bd. of Ed., 526 U.S. 629 , 119 S.Ct. 1661, 1676 , 143 L.Ed.2d 839 (1999). Within the context of Title IX, a student’s claim of hostile environment can arise from a single incident. Brown v. … In Davis v. Monroe Cty., Board of Ed., - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1661 , 143 L.Ed.2d 839 (1999), the hostile *64 environment arose out of a male student's repeated harassment of a female student.

City of Auburn v. Paul

113 Me. 207 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 18, 1915

In Bradley v. Greenwich Board of Works, L. R., 3 Q. B. D., 384, 388, where a similar question arose under the Metropolis Management Act, 1862, Sec. 53; it is said (Cockbum, C. J.) … See Auburn v. Paul, ubi supra. See also Pierce v. Bangor, 105 Maine, 413. Plaintiff nonsuit.

Cohen v. Maine School Administrative District No. 71

393 A.2d 547 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 10, 1978

See Cohen v. Maine School Administrative District No. 71, Me., 369 A.2d 624 (1977); Cohen v. Ketchum, Me., 344 A.2d 387 (1975). Mr. … See Creaghe v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty Co., 323 F.2d 981 (10th Cir. 1963); Gyro Brass Mfg. Corp. v. United Auto. A. & A. Imp.

United States v. Quattrucci

329 F. Supp. 612 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 9, 1971

He contends that the failure of the local board thus to consider and act upon these letters invalidated his induction order. The basis of his position is United States v. … Defendant does not contend that the Board acted improperly in failing to act on this post-indictment claim. Ehlert v. United States, 402 U.S. 99 , 91 S.Ct. 1319 , 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (April 21, 1971) ; United States v.

Roberts v. Town of Southwest Harbor

861 A.2d 617 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 1, 2004

See, e.g., Ram’s Head Partners, LLC v. Town of Cape Elizabeth, 2003 ME 131 , 834 A.2d 916 . [¶ 4] In Yusem v. … Chase v. Town of Machiasport, 1998 ME 260, ¶ 11 , 721 A.2d 636, 640 .

Littlefield v. Newell

85 Me. 246 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 2, 1893

Williams, Pet’r, v. Co. Com. 35 Maine, 346 ; Carpenter v. Co. Com. 21 Pick. 258 ; Moses on Mand. 104-147 ; High, Ex. Leg. Item. § 323 ; Dillon’s Mun. Corp. 675 ; Att’y Gen’l v. … City Council of Lawrence, 111 Mass. 90 ; Lyon v. Rice, 41 Conn. 248 ; Lamb v. Lyon, 44 Penn. 336 . In Att’y Gen’l v.

UAH-Hydro Kennebec, L.P. v. Town of Winslow

921 A.2d 146 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 1, 2007

Light Co. v. … Partners v.

Smith v. Gordon

22 F. Cas. 554 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 2, 1843

Jur. § 540, note 2, § 547; Thompson v. Brown, 4 Johns. Ch. 620 , 631), if in point of fact such is not the decree most usually made ( 4 Johns. Ch. 631, 638 ; Martin v. Martin, 1 Ves. Sr. 211; Douglas v. … Clay [1 Dickens, 393], cited in 10 Ves. 40; Brooks v. Reynolds, 1 Brown, 183).

Keene v. Rodgers

316 F. Supp. 217 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 5, 1970

The requirements of due process in student disciplinary proceedings have been fully discussed by several courts, e. g., Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1961); Moore v. … v.

Boyce v. Potter

642 A.2d 1342 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 6, 1994

See, e.g., Brown v. Palmer Constr. Co., 295 A.2d 263, 264 (Me.1972). … Abshire v.

Roque Island Gardner Homestead Corp. v. Town of Jonesport

167 A.3d 564 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 11, 2017

Delogu v. … See Roberts v.

Green v. Lawrence

877 A.2d 1079 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 18, 2005

The Planning Board approved this plan. … See id.; Lange v.

Googin v. City of Lewiston

103 Me. 119 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 28, 1907

"Board of Mayor and Aldermen. … It is also true, as stated in Kidson v.

Sucrest Corp. v. M/V Jennifer

455 F. Supp. 371 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 11, 1978

Cartwright was issued a First Mate’s Foreign Going License by the British Board of Trade in 1958. … . § 1304 (2)(q); Nichimen Company, Inc. v. M/V Farland, 462 F.2d 319, 329 (2d Cir. 1972); M. W. Zack Metal Co. v. S. S.

Jacobsky v. C. D'Alfonso & Sons, Inc.

358 A.2d 511 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 2, 1976

National Labor Relations Board, 330 U.S. 485 , 67 S.Ct. 789 , 91 L.Ed. 1040 (1947)) but in National Labor Relations Board v. … Woodard v. Mordecai, supra at 645. 2 . Parsons v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 140 Conn. 290 , 99 A.2d 149 (1953) (“an honest judgment . . . reasonable and fairly exercised”) ; Robinson v.

Kinney v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.

679 A.2d 517 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 12, 1996

The employees contend, and the Board agreed, that the assessment of attorney fees is an “award” for purposes of awarding interest pursuant to section 72. Ott v. Hussey Mfg., Me. W.C.C.App.Div. 5-455, 5-457 (Me.1984). … Lucas v. E.A.

Huntress v. Tiney

39 Me. 237 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1855

Brown v. Davis, 9 N. H. 76; Parker v. Guillow, 10 N. H. 103. The sheriff’s return is conclusive as to the formal proceedings by the appraisers and himself, and cannot be controlled by other evidence. Bott v. … Root v. Colton, 1 Met. 345 ; Stevens v. Brown, 3 Ver. 421; Metcalf v. Gillett, 5 Conn. 400 . The evidence of Baker, as offered, is to the entire contradiction of the most material parts of the officer’s return.

Cayer v. TOWN OF MADAWASKA

984 A.2d 207 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 15, 2009

Cayer appealed the Board’s approvals to the Superior Court pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 80B. … White v. Nason, 2005 ME 73, ¶ 7 , 874 A.2d 891, 893 . “Absent any clear error in the underlying factual determinations, we review the denial of a motion for civil contempt for abuse of discretion.” Ellis v.