Case law

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 19, 2001

Your question is whether the subject of a court-ordered psychological evaluation qualifies as a "patient" entitled to the disclosure described in this statute. … The statute is clearly intended to provide, rather than prevent, access to medical records. . . . Dr.

Radford v. Byers

District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Mar 29, 2024

Captain Davis is entitled to qualified immunity. 12 August 2020 Incident. … For all these reasons, Sergeant Brewer is also entitled to qualified immunity. 4.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 2007

Given that you are a city employee, I believe documents containing the information requested in Item 3 above clearly qualify as "public records" under this definition. As my predecessor noted in Op. Att'y Gen. … Although this standard is not easily met, medical records and information relating to a person's finances or marriage may qualify.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 28, 1993

This office has noted, however, that the law pertaining to records of the ACIC qualifies as a specific exemption to the open records provisions of the FOIA. See Op. Att'y Gen. Nos. 91-111 and 86-20. … Supp. 1991) established the Arkansas Crime Information Center and specifically limited access to the data available through the ACIC system.

Ludrick v. State

381 S.W.3d 87 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 26, 2011

Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-10-127 (Repl. 2010) authorizes and directs the Administrative Office of the Courts to establish a program to facilitate the use of interpreters and translators in all state and local courts … Joel’s qualifications and believed she was no longer qualified to be a non-eerti-fied interpreter. Mr.

United States v. Bailey

666 F. Supp. 1275 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 21, 1987

The statute itself includes expansive categories so as to clearly include attorney's fees as being subject to forfeiture. As stated in United States v. … The Court agrees with the Government that the following principles were established in One Parcel of Land .

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 6, 2000

Clearly, therefore, the "proceeds" resulting from a sale of forfeited property are deposited in the asset forfeiture fund. … Section 5-64-505 (g)(5)(B) provides that: "However, if the court determines either that the prosecuting attorney has failed to establish that such grounds exist or that the owner or interest holder has established a defense

Parker v. Lockhart

797 F. Supp. 718 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jul 7, 1992

The Ar *719 kansas Supreme Court reversed his conviction because that statute could not be construed to encompass the facts established at Parker’s trial. 1 Parker v. … In that case, the court clearly disavowed any notion that its earlier opinion was based upon the failure of the state to prove its case.

McKenzie v. Moore

453 S.W.3d 686 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 14, 2015

Moore also testified that she was the trustee of a trust that was established by her late husband for his daughters’ benefit. … “Something more must be shown to qualify as standing in loco parentis.” Id. at 535, 867 S.W.2d at 456.

Rager v. Turley

68 Ark. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 1, 1999

Appellants’ contention that appellee bore the burden of establishing Joshua’s paternity is simply incorrect; that burden remained with Joshua. … In order to qualify as a beneficiary of the wrongful-death settlement, Joshua was required to prove that he is Thomas’s child; this, he did not do.

Ward v. Arkansas State Police

539 F. Supp. 1116 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · May 24, 1982

Clearly the plaintiff has failed to sustain this ultimate burden of proof or persuasion. 5. … Unquestionably, Plaintiff was not qualified for the position. 6.

Bailey v. Henslee

184 F. Supp. 298 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · May 26, 1960

It is established that prior to 1956 in several of the years Negroes were called on such special panels. … The relevance of jury discrimination, if any, in the civil divisions to petitioner’s case is not established. D.

Sahara Gonzales v. Arkansas Department of Human Services and Minor Children

2023 Ark. App. 444 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 4, 2023

Gonzales could not qualify for HUD assistance because she owed HUD $1600 for destruction of property in her previous house. … On this record, we cannot say that the circuit court clearly erred in finding that the children would be at risk of potential harm if returned to Gonzales.

The Travelers Indemnity Company and Stephen E. Goldman v. the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas

2022 Ark. 146 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 23, 2022

, 2022 Ark. 32, 639 S.W.3d 319 (holding that although appellant had presented three points in the interlocutory appeal, the only issue that we had jurisdiction to review was whether appellant was entitled to sovereign immunity … Thus, that case is clearly distinguishable.

Al M. Williams v. Erma Jean Davis; The Estate of Earlee Walker; And Ricco Walker, Administrator of the Estate of Earlee Walker

625 S.W.3d 243 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 28, 2021

Simply being a former step-child does not establish an in loco parentis relationship. Moreover, the Court, after observing Mr. … “Something more must be shown to qualify as standing in loco parentis.” Id. at 435, 867 S.W.2d at 456.

Moore v. State

268 Ark. 171 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 3, 1980

It's the Court's view that the probable cause existed to search the vehicle and this probable cause was fully established only very shortly before the vehicle was searched and that is, they established the gray station wagon … Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 , 97 S.Ct. 2476 , 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977), which has been cited as establishing the "suitcase doctrine."

Richard S. Gross v. State of Arkansas

2020 Ark. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 23, 2020

Furthermore, the 911 system used by the caller has some features to trace and identify callers, which provided safeguards against the making of a false report with immunity. Id. at 400. … “Our rules provide that an investigatory stop may be made upon a reasonable suspicion which need not rise to the level required to establish probable cause for an arrest.” Potter v.

The Travelers Indemnity Company and Stephen E. Goldman v. the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas

2022 Ark. 146 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 23, 2022

, 2022 Ark. 32, 639 S.W.3d 319 (holding that although appellant had presented three points in the interlocutory appeal, the only issue that we had jurisdiction to review was whether appellant was entitled to sovereign immunity … Thus, that case is clearly distinguishable.

Alcoa v. Vann

14 Ark. App. 223 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 3, 1985

The testimony clearly details Vann’s direct asbestos exposure during his 27 years with Alcoa. … In Sanyo, this Court pointed out that in order to qualify as an occupational disease, the disease must be one, the hazard of which is peculiar to the particular process or employment.

Save Energy Reap Taxes v. Shaw

374 Ark. 428 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 16, 2008

We hold that the circuit judge did not clearly err on this issue. To summarize, we hold that the circuit judge was not clearly erroneous in finding a total of 461 signatures on the initiative petitions to be invalid. … Affirmed. 1 A petition must be signed by thirty-eight percent of the qualified electors in any given county in order to certify a “wet/dry” election. Ark. Code Ann. § 3-8-205 (Repl. 2008).