Case law

Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Franco-American Charolaise, Ltd.

646 P.2d 620 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1982

Co. v. Kents Lake Reservoir Co., 104 Utah 202 , 135 P.2d 108, 111 (1943). … Thompson v. Ekberg, 613 P.2d 466,467 (Okl.1980).

Board of Law Library Trustees v. State Ex Rel. Petuske

62 O.B.A.J. 3658 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1991

Mireles v. Waco, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 286 , 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991), quoting from Stump v. … Burdick v. Independent School Dist., Okl., 702 P.2d 48 , 54 n. 10 (1985); Davis v. Davis, Okl., 708 P.2d 1102 , 1104 n. 2 (1985); McCracken v.

Groves v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS, WASHITA COUNTY

429 P.2d 994 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1967

Anderson, Plaintiffs in Error, v. … In Robertson v.

Strong v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement Board

76 O.B.A.J. 1399 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 2005

McCarty, 76 Idaho 153 , 279 P.2d 879 -80 (1955); Board of Control of the Employees' Retirement Sys. of Alabama v. Had-den, 854 So.2d 1165, 1169 (Ala.Civ.App.2002); City of Oakland v. … Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Retirement Sys., 340 N.J.Super. 473 , 774 A.2d 680, 688-89 (2001); Wallace v.

Adolph Coors Co. v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

584 P.2d 717 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1978

In State v. … The Court in Blaisdell [Home Building & Loan Assn. v.

Tulsa County Excise Board v. Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co.

180 Okla. 287 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1937

Co. v. Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. (2d) 274 . … Co. v. Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. (2d) 274 . School district No. 26 had a valuation less than fifty million dollars. It had a town within its bounds, but no levy w'as made for the town.

School Dist. No. 160, Caddo County v. Alcott

31 Okla. 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

Brown v. Parker, 2 Okla. 258 , 39 Pac. 567 . After diligent search we have been unable' to find any statute, state or federal, upon which the contentions of either party can be sustained. … Brown v. Parker, supra; Winfield Town Co. v. Maris et al., 11 Kan. 128 . It also follows that the school district is not and cannot be interested in the lots in question, and cannot, therefore, maintain this action.

Phillips v. Ladd

399 P.2d 501 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1965

See Brown v. Brown, Okl., . 365 P.2d 385 . … Therefore, under the rule followed in Brown v. Brown, supra, this feature of the trial will not be •considered.

City of Tulsa v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension

387 P.2d 255 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1963

Livingston v. Maxwell, Old., 353 P.2d 690 . … , as shown by Forston v.

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Okmulgee County

128 Okla. 58 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1926

Kuchler v. Weaver, 23 Okla. 420 , 100 Pac. 915 ; Union Savings Assoc. v. Burns, 74 Okla. 1 , 176 Pac. 227 ; Priddy v. Thompson, 204 Fed. 955 , 123 C. C. A. 277 ; Citizens State Bank v. … It was said by this court in the case of Beams v.

State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rs v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

191 Okla. 155 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1942

J. 1521; Board of Education v. Commissioners, 137 N. C. 310 , 49 S. E. 353 ; State v. Osborne, 195 S. C. 295, 11 S. E. 2d 260, 266 ; Collins v. Humphrey, 181 Ark. 609 , 27 S. W. 2d 102 ; State v. … CORN, V. C. J., concurs in result. RILEY, GIBSON, and DAVISON, JJ., dissent.

Missouri State Life Ins. v. Board of County Com'rs

173 Okla. 26 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1935

See Board of County Commissioners v. Dennis, 140 Okla. 204 , 282 P. 457 . … In Marsh v. The Board of Super *29 visors of Fulton County, 10 Wall. 676 , 19 L. Ed. 1040 , Mr.

Board of Com'rs v. District Court of Wagoner County

200 Okla. 590 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1948

Mays v. … In Morton v.

Raburn v. Board of County Com'rs of McIntosh County

168 Okla. 4 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1934

CULLISON, V. C. J. Henry H. … HI, or IV; and shall be exempt from all taxation. * * *” The United States statute just quoted was passed upon very recently by the United States Supreme Court, in the case of Trotter, G’dn, v. State of Tennessee, 78 L.

Solenberg v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety

65 O.B.A.J. 1205 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1993

For general support, Solenberg contends this court’s holding in Browning v. State, 812 P.2d 1372 (Okl.App.1991), is indistinguishable. We disagree. … In Browning the driver’s demurrer put in issue the “very existence” of the rules and regulations promulgated by the Board of Tests for Alcohol and Drug Influence for administration of breath-alcohol tests.

Excise Board of Cheek County v. Gulf Pipe Line Co.

156 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1931

The actions were based upon the warrants thus issued and not upon an alleged contract based upon claims filed and disallowed by the board. In Faught v. … In Pettis v.

Carter v. Board of Review Under Oklahoma Employment Security Act

323 P.2d 362 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1958

Claimants admit the pertinence of the case of Jones v. … J., CORN, V. C. J, and DAVISON, HALLEY, JOHNSON, JACKSON and CARLILE, JJ., concur.

Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Seminole County Excise Board

194 Okla. 40 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1944

Standish Pipe Line Co. et al. v. Oklahoma County Excise Board, 187 Okla. 245 , 102 P. 2d 606 ; Sinclair Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Tulsa Co., 173 Okla. 375 , 49 P. 2d 114 ; Faught v. … In Excise Board of LeFlore County v. Kansas City Southern Ry.

Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County Excise Board

183 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1938

Anderson v. Ritterbusch, 22 Okla. 761 , 98 P. 1002 , and Bishop v. City of Tulsa, 21 Okla. Cr. 457 , 209 P. 228 . … City of Pond Creek v. Haskell, Governor, 21 Okla. 711 , 97 P. 338 ; In re County Com’rs of Counties Comprising Seventh Judicial District, 22 Okla 435, 98 P. 557 ; Perry v.

Excise Board of Creek County v. State Ex Rel. Kissick

105 Okla. 102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1924

This rule has been approved in Muskogee Times-Democrat v. County Commissioners of Muskogee County, 76 Okla. 188 , 184 Pac. 591 ; State ex rel. v. Beatty, 77 Okla. 50 , 186 Pac. 240 ; Watts, Mayor v. … This conclusion is sustained by Board of Education of the City of Guthrie v.