Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersAR

4,882 results

1.73s

  • Hanna v. State

    2009 Ark. App. 809 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 2, 2009

    When cross-examined by the State, he was clearly evasive, again asserting that he was “just not able to work.” … The record does not reflect when Hanna qualified for SSI, which is not income for child-support purposes.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Ross v. State

    300 Ark. 369 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 6, 1989

    Clearly, the police had probable cause to arrest the appellant. We also find no merit in the appellant’s argument that Payton v. … Appellant argues on appeal that Hendrix was not qualified to testify as an expert on the point of origin and cause of the fire.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Perry v. Baptist Health

    358 Ark. 238 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 24, 2004

    schedule of qualified surgeons for the purpose of providing emergency care at Baptist Medical Center. … Although appellant received benefits from his participation in the trauma-call schedule, in my view, the complaint clearly established that the benefits were merely incidental to the contract between Arkansas Trauma and Baptist

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Curis Pharmacy (Sentrix Pharmacy and Discount, Llc), Os02705; And Kenneth Zielinski, Pd10077 v. Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy

    2021 Ark. App. 500 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 8, 2021

    You are qualified for a non-narcotic topical pain cream which is covered 100% by workman’s compensation. … The script itself says that the claimants “are qualified for a non-narcotic topical pain cream which is covered 100% by workman’s compensation.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fureigh v. Horn

    434 S.W.3d 390 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 16, 2014

    A qualified or conditional privilege may arise when a common interest is involved and 3 Mr. … If the utterances go outside the bounds of reason and purpose for making the statements, the immunity can be lost. Id. (citing Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc. v. Felton, 276 Ark. 304, 634 S.W.2d 135 (1982)).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stacy Lewis v. Arkansas Department of Human Services and Minor Children

    2025 Ark. App. 209 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 9, 2025

    On May 22, 2024, the court held a hearing regarding the paternity of MC4, and DNA test results established that Lamarquis Watson is MC4’s father. … Stacy was making reasonable efforts toward achieving the goals established in the case plan, and reunification remained the goal.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ludrick v. State

    381 S.W.3d 87 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 26, 2011

    Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-10-127 (Repl. 2010) authorizes and directs the Administrative Office of the Courts to establish a program to facilitate the use of interpreters and translators in all state and local courts … Joel’s qualifications and believed she was no longer qualified to be a non-eerti-fied interpreter. Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • D.B.&J. Holden Farms Ltd. Partnership v. Arkansas State Highway Commission

    93 Ark. App. 202 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 30, 2005

    The burden of proof in establishing jury misconduct is on the moving party. Id. … stated in Breitenberg: The fact that the jury returned a verdict in about eight minutes after having the case submitted to them does not indicate to us that Beach did not receive a fair trial when the issues of fact were so clearly

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Walker

    District Court, W.D. Arkansas · May 1, 2023

    Further, having found that the facts do not make out a constitutional violation, Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. See, e.g., Krout v. … In cases involving surprise attacks, the Eighth Circuit noted it had upheld the grant of qualified immunity to prison officials.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 19, 2001

    Your question is whether the subject of a court-ordered psychological evaluation qualifies as a "patient" entitled to the disclosure described in this statute. … The statute is clearly intended to provide, rather than prevent, access to medical records. . . . Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nance v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

    316 Ark. 43 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 21, 1994

    Nance argues that custody may only be established pursuant to a divorce, and as Mr. … Nance’s home qualifies as information “relating to representation” of Ms. Nance. We need not dwell on Model Rule 1.6, however, as the matter of attorney-client privilege is clearly regulated by Ark. R. Evid. 502(b).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 3, 2011

    In order to establish an equal protection violation arising out of a classification that does not affect a suspect class or a fundamental right, it is necessary to show that the disparity is arbitrary — that is, that the … Francis Levee District and non-qualifying property owners who own fewer than 40 acres.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Cheney

    253 Ark. 926 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 2, 1973

    Ann. §§ 12-2701 — 12-2709 (Repl. 1968), established the Quasi-Judicial Retirement System for the State of Arkansas. … Cheney’s rights were clearly defined in Act 148 of 1965 and his rights became consummate when he fulfilled the service requirements created by the Act.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Rager v. Turley

    68 Ark. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 1, 1999

    Appellants’ contention that appellee bore the burden of establishing Joshua’s paternity is simply incorrect; that burden remained with Joshua. … In order to qualify as a beneficiary of the wrongful-death settlement, Joshua was required to prove that he is Thomas’s child; this, he did not do.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Bailey

    666 F. Supp. 1275 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 21, 1987

    The statute itself includes expansive categories so as to clearly include attorney's fees as being subject to forfeiture. As stated in United States v. … The Court agrees with the Government that the following principles were established in One Parcel of Land .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 20, 1996

    The situation that you have described clearly falls within this general restriction against school choice. … In establishing the acceptable range of variance, the department is directed to use the remedial guideline established in Little Rock School District v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The Travelers Indemnity Company and Stephen E. Goldman v. the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas

    2022 Ark. 146 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 23, 2022

    , 2022 Ark. 32, 639 S.W.3d 319 (holding that although appellant had presented three points in the interlocutory appeal, the only issue that we had jurisdiction to review was whether appellant was entitled to sovereign immunity … Thus, that case is clearly distinguishable.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McKenzie v. Moore

    453 S.W.3d 686 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 14, 2015

    Moore also testified that she was the trustee of a trust that was established by her late husband for his daughters’ benefit. … “Something more must be shown to qualify as standing in loco parentis.” Id. at 535, 867 S.W.2d at 456.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pratt v. Juno

    District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Sep 14, 2023

    immunity. … Personal capacity claims “are those which allege personal liability for individual actions by officials in the course of their duties; these claims do not require proof of any policy and qualified immunity may be raised

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Moore v. State

    268 Ark. 171 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 3, 1980

    It's the Court's view that the probable cause existed to search the vehicle and this probable cause was fully established only very shortly before the vehicle was searched and that is, they established the gray station wagon … Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 , 97 S.Ct. 2476 , 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977), which has been cited as establishing the "suitcase doctrine."

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.