Case law

Buckalew v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

91 N.J.L. 517 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 17, 1918

This was the doctrine approved by the Supreme Court, after much research, and a careful consideration of the authorities in the case of The Board of Freeholders of Sussex v. Strader, 18 N. J. … In Jersey City v. Kiernan, 50 N. J.

Alford v. Somerset County Welfare Board

158 N.J. Super. 302 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 21, 1978

Super. 302 (1978) 385 A.2d 1275 ELDORA ALFORD, APPELLANT, v. SOMERSET COUNTY WELFARE BOARD, DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES, RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Cafaro v. Cafaro , above; Straver v. Straver, 26 N.J. Misc. 218, 222 , 59 A. 2d 39 (Ch. 1948); Limpert v. Limpert, 119 N.J. Super. 438, 440 (App. Div. 1972).

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Szaferman

117 N.J. 94 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 1989

In Botkin v. … In Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders v.

Gulnac v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

74 N.J.L. 543 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 3, 1906

The reasons which led to the decision that the senate of New Jersey is not a continuous body are quite as cogent in the case of a board of chosen freeholders. State v. Rogers, 27 Vroom 480, 622 . … Allen v. Freeholders of Hunterdon, 42 Vroom 247 .

Leang v. Jersey City Board of Education

198 N.J. 557 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 16, 2009

Tarr v. … See Rocci v.

Steel v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

89 N.J.L. 609 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1916

Sullivan v. McOsker, 84 N. J. L. 380. … James v. DuBois, 16 N. J. L. 286.

R & R Marketing, L.L.C. v. Brown-Forman Corp.

307 N.J. Super. 474 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 27, 1998

The essential relationship between Brown-Forman and R & R has not changed by combining *485 the individual corporate entities under the umbrella of a limited liability company. In Joseph H. Reinfeld, Inc. v. … Ibid.See also Royal Liquor v.

Johnson v. Board of Ed., Wildwood

102 N.J.L. 606 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1926

Jernee v. Monmouth, 52 N. J. L. 553, 555; Paterson v. Erie Railroad Co., 78 Id. 592, 593; Bisbing v. Asbury Park, 80 Id. 416, 418. … The first is Bigelow v.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

56 N.J.L. 459 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1894

State v. Kirby, 2 South. *835; Griffith v. West, 5 Halst. 350; New Jersey Railroad and Transportation Co. v. Suydam, 2 Harr. 25 , 69. … , and by the act of 1878 the board was authorized to transfer sums from one account to another.

State v. Essex Public Road Board

48 N.J.L. 366 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1886

It was held by the Supreme Court, in Wright v. … It was so held by this court at this term in Essex Public Road Board v. Speer.

Monks v. NJ State Parole Board

58 N.J. 238 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 10, 1971

Puchalski v. N.J. State Parole Board, supra, 55 N.J. 113 ; see Menechino v. Oswald, 430 F. 2d 403 (2 Cir. 1970); Schawartzberg v. United States Board of Parole, 399 F. 2d 297 (10 Cir. 1968); Briguglio v. N.Y. … Assn. v. Howell, 24 N.J. 488, 499 (1957). In White v. Parole Board of State of N.J., 17 N.J. Super. 580 ( App.

BARACIA v. Board of Trustees

420 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 2011

In McDermott v. … As our Supreme Court found in Owens v. C. & R.

MARQUEZ v. CHEF VOLA, INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 23, 2022

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 665 A.2d 1139 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1995)). … V.

McDonald v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

99 N.J.L. 393 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1924

McDonald v. Board of Freeholders of Hudson, 98 N. J. L. 386. Upon a review in this court the judgment of the Supreme Court granting the peremptory’ writ was reversed. Ante p. 110. … Central Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 75 N. J. L. 771.

Cowenhoven v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

44 N.J.L. 232 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1882

The following authorities rest substantially upon the same footing, or clearly recognize the doctrine above expressed : Van Hook v. Whitlock, 3 Paige 409 ; Shepherd v. Hills, 11 Ex. 55; Jordan v. … Robinson, 15 Me. 167 ; Richards v. Bickley, 13 Serg. & R. 395; Lane v. Morris, 10 Ga. 162 .

R. R. v. Board of Education

109 N.J. Super. 337 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 1970

R. 1312 (1926); Knight v. State Board of Education. 200 F. Supp. 174 (M. D. Tenn. 1961); cf. Stricklin v. Regents of University of Wisconsin, 297 F. Supp. 416 (W. D. Wis. 1969); Marzette v. McPhee, 294 F. … See Madera v. Board of Education of City of New York, 386 F. 2d 778 (2 Cir. 1967), cert. den. 390 U. S. 1028 , 88 S. Ct. 1416 , 20 L. Ed. 2d 284 (1968); Scott v. Alabama State Board of Education, 300 F. Supp. 163 (M. D.

Van Buskirk v. Board of Education

78 N.J.L. 650 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 28, 1910

Cont. 21, 462; Russell v. Sa da Bandeira, 13 C. B. (N. S.) 149, 200; Sharpe v. San Paulo Railway, L. R., 8 Ch. 579; Rex v. Peto, 1 Younge & J. 37; Cooper v. Langdon, 9 Mees. & W. 60; Lord & Son v. … No one could waive those provisions save the board of education, or someone authorized by that board to do so.

State v. Board of Township Committee

55 N.J.L. 463 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1893

Nor is it for the flagging and curbing of sidewalks, as in the case of Kirkpatrick v. Commissioners, 13 Vroom 512 . … Agens v. Newark, 8 Vroom 417 ; Kirkpatrick v. Commissioners , 13 Id. 510; Righter v. Newark , 16 Id. 104; Culver v. Jersey City, Id. 256; Reynolds v. Paterson , 19 Id. 435.

Board of Fire Commissioners v. Cascella

326 N.J. Super. 142 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 14, 1998

Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 142 N.J. 520, 540 , 666 A.2d 146 (1995). *146 Most recently, the Appellate Division in Nash v. … See State *147 v.

Bonomo v. NJ State Parole Board

104 N.J. Super. 226 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 17, 1969

Kincaid v. State Parole Board, 53 N.J. Super. 526 ( App. Div. 1959); Pickering v. State, unreported, Docket No. A 88-55 ( App. … See our opinion in Roman v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 104 N.J. Super. 222 , decided simultaneously herewith.