Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

4.42s

  • Muir v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    450 A.2d 412 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 26, 1982

    Spevak v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 407 A.2d 549 (1979); Schiffman v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C. … The mere existence of substantial evidence contrary to these findings does not allow us to substitute our judgment for that of the Board. Spevak v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, supra.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jackson Hospital Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2009

    , ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. … The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) objected to the order and sought a number of changes.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation v. The Renegotiation Board

    425 F.2d 578 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 1970

    Benson v. GSA, 289 F.Supp. 590, 595 (W.D.Wash. 1968), aff’d sub nom. GSA v. Benson, 415 F.2d 878 (9th Cir. 1969). … Ley, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 133 , 420 F.2d 1336 (1969); GSA v. Benson, supra note 14. 22 . The Board initially also relied on 5 U.S.C. § 552 (b) (5) (Supp.

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • Alldata Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    245 F.3d 803 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 2001

    MECO Corp. v. NLRB, 986 F.2d 1434, 1437 (D.C. Cir. 1993). … See Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 366-67 (1998); see also Southwest Merch. Corp. v. NLRB, 943 F.2d 1354, 1360 (D.C. Cir. 1991).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Fairfax Village Condominium VIII Board of Directors

    775 A.2d 1085 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2001

    The Smiths filed in the Superior Court an action against the Board of Directors of Fairfax Village (Board) alleging wrongful foreclosure (94-CA-11200). … Iann ucci v. Pearlstein, 629 A.2d 555, 559 (D.C.1993) (citing District of Columbia v. Greene, 539 A.2d 1082, 1083-84 (D.C.1988)) (other citations omitted).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dwyer v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    320 A.2d 306 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 24, 1974

    [Clouser v. David, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 12, 13 , 309 F.2d 233, 234 (1962); emphasis added.] 5 See also Taylor v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjust., D.C.App., 308 A.2d 230 (1973). Moreover, as we held in Palmer v. … We recognize, of course, that Clouser v. David, supra, constitutes the case law of the District of Columbia which we are required to follow. M.A.P. v. Ryan, D.C.App., 285 A.2d 310 (1971).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Air Carrier Association v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    436 F.2d 185 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 28, 1970

    National Aviation Trades Ass'n v. … Marine Space Enclosures, Inc. v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Estelle Denton v. Merit Systems Protection Board

    768 F.2d 422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 26, 1985

    Co. v. Wetzel, 424 U.S. 737, 740 , 96 S.Ct. 1202, 1204 , 47 L.Ed.2d 435 (1976); Louisville & Nashville Ry. Co. v. Mottley, 211 U.S. 149, 152 , 29 S.Ct. 42, 43 , 53 L.Ed. 126 (1908). … See generally Van Drasek v. Lehman, 762 F.2d 1065 (D.C.Cir.1985).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    306 F.2d 739 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 24, 1962

    Spiegel v. Public Utilities Commission, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 307 , 226 F.2d 29 , certiorari denied sub nom. Capital Transit Co. v. Spiegel, 1955, 350 U.S. 904 , 76 S.Ct. 182 [ 100 L.Ed. 794 ]; Beaumont, S. L. & W. Ry. v. … . * * *»» *743 Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 97 U.S.App.D.C. 358, 362 , 231 F.2d 517, 521 . And see Lake Central Airlines v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Harrell v. Board of Commissioners of District of Columbia

    269 F. Supp. 919 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 1967

    In this connection, the opinion of the Supreme Court in Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603 , 80 S.Ct. 1367 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1435 , is illuminating.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • North American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    240 F.2d 867 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1957

    Air Transport Associates v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1952, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 147 , 199 F.2d 181 , certiorari denied, 1953, 344 U.S. 922 , 73 S.Ct. 386 , 97 L.Ed. 710 ; American Air Transport v. … Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 7 Cir., 1945, 147 F.2d 589 ; cf. Federal Trade Commission v. Cement Institute, 1948, 333 U.S. 683, 700-703 , 68 S.Ct. 793 , 92 L.Ed. 1010 ; Hammond v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Allentuck v. District of Columbia Minimum Wage & Industrial Safety Board

    261 A.2d 826 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1969

    SEC v. Chenery, 332 U.S. 194, 196 , 67 S.Ct. 1575 , 91 L.Ed. 1995 (1947); Braniff Airways v. CAB, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 132 , 135, 306 F.2d 739 , 742 (1962). See also footnote 24, infra. … Secretary of Agriculture v. United States, 347 U.S. 645, 654 , 74 S.Ct. 826 , 98 L.Ed. 1015 (1954); Easton Pub. Co. v. FCC, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 33, 36 , 175 F.2d 344, 347 (1949); WAIT Radio v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • In Re Sofaer

    728 A.2d 625 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1999

    The leading case interpreting predecessor DR 9-101(b), Brown v. … of former government employment is Brown v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Gordon W. Harvey v. Merit Systems Protection Board

    802 F.2d 537 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 1986

    See Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). … In re Frazier, 1 M.S.P.B. 159 , 1 M.S.P.R. 163 186 (1979), aff'd, Frazier v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 672 F.2d 150 (D.C.Cir.1982).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Agri Processor Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    514 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 4, 2008

    Co. v. … NLRA section 9(b) “vests in the Board authority to determine ‘the unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining.’ ” NLRB v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    228 F.2d 13 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1955

    Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc., v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 1948, 333 U.S. 103, 112-113 , 68 S.Ct. 431, 437 , 92 L.Ed. 568 . Cf. Isbrandtsen Co. v. … In Federal Communications Comm. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Air Line Dispatchers Ass'n v. National Mediation Board

    189 F.2d 685 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 17, 1951

    Co., 1948, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 205 , 167 F.2d 529 ; United Transport Service v. National Mediation Board, 1949, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 352 , 179 F.2d 446, 449 , and Radio Officers’ Union v. … Examples of such interpretation are: Switchmen’s Union of North America v. *689 National Mediation Board ( 320 U.S. 297 [ 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 ]); American Federation of Labor v.

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • Turner v. DC Board of Elections and Ethics

    170 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 2001

    District Properties Associates v. … Board.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Comar, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    111 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 2004

    See Int’l Ass’n of Machinists v. … .); see also Trident Seafoods, Inc. v. NLRB, 101 F.3d 111 , 118-19 & n. 13 (D.C.Cir.1996).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lawrence v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

    611 A.2d 529 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1992

    D’Elia & Marks Co. v. Lyon, 31 A.2d 647, 648 (D.C.Mun.App.1943) (quoting Barney v. … Rudd v. Rudd, 278 A.2d 120, 121 (D.C.1971).

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.