Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.88s
Robinson v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
91 N.J.L. 154 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 17, 1917
In Freeholders of Sussex v. Strader, 18 N. J. … To the same effect is Freeholders v. Hough, 55 Id. 628, 636, and Woodbridge, v. Raritan Traction Co., 64 N. J. Eq. 169. Xor is there anything in Ballanyine. v. Kearny Township, 52 X. J. L. 338; S.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBoard of Chosen Freeholders v. Szaferman
117 N.J. 94 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 1989
In Botkin v. … In Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBoard of Chosen Freeholders v. Emmerich
57 N.J. Eq. 535 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 31, 1898
Emery, V. C. In this case the petitioners, the board of freeholders, condemned for a county road a portion of certain premises which were owned by Emmerich and leased to one Distler. … Const. art. 1 ¶ 16; Crane v. Elizabeth, 9 Stew. Eq. 339 (Errors and Appeals, 1882).
Cited 4 timesPublishedDownie v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
54 N.J.L. 223 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1892
The situation in its general features is this: The board of freeholders duly advertised for proposals to do this work, and. in that transaction the plaintiff was the lowest bidder. … by the director of the board founded on communications made to him by other officers of the corporation.
Cited 5 timesPublishedChiarello v. Board of Trustees
429 N.J. Super. 194 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 20, 2012
N.J.S.A. 1:1-5; see *201 also Asbury Park Press v. City of Asbury Park, 19 N.J. 183, 199 , 115 A.2d 564 (1955); Levine v. … State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFelter v. Board of Zoning Adjustment
14 N.J. Misc. 247 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 11, 1936
The writ brings up for review the action of the Glen Bock board of adjustment in sustaining the building inspector in refusing to grant prosecutor a permit for the erection of a gasoline service station. … Gabrielson v. Glen Ridge, 13 N. J. Mis. R. 142; 176 Atl. Rep. 676 . The failure to grant prosecutor a permit is violative of his constitutional rights. Durkin Lumber Co. v. Fitzsimmons, 106 N. J. L. 183; 147 Atl.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBorinsky v. Board of Adjustment, Newark
122 N.J.L. 111 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 7, 1939
The attack is on the granting of the permit, and the refusal of the board to set it aside as beyond the power of the superintendent to grant it. … The action of the superintendent of buildings in granting the permit and the refusal of the Board of Adjustment to set it aside on appeal, are set aside, with costs.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState v. State Board of Assessors
55 N.J.L. 55 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1892
The proviso under which exemption is claimed has been recently construed by this court in the case of the Construction Co. v. Board of Assessors, reported in 24 Vroom 564 .
Cited 2 timesPublished109 N.J. Super. 337 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 1970
R. 1312 (1926); Knight v. State Board of Education. 200 F. Supp. 174 (M. D. Tenn. 1961); cf. Stricklin v. Regents of University of Wisconsin, 297 F. Supp. 416 (W. D. Wis. 1969); Marzette v. McPhee, 294 F. … See Madera v. Board of Education of City of New York, 386 F. 2d 778 (2 Cir. 1967), cert. den. 390 U. S. 1028 , 88 S. Ct. 1416 , 20 L. Ed. 2d 284 (1968); Scott v. Alabama State Board of Education, 300 F. Supp. 163 (M. D.
Cited 12 timesPublishedBoard of Chosen Freeholders v. Buck
49 N.J.L. 228 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1886
For reversal — The Chief Justice, Depue, Dixon, Magie, Parker, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Whitaker. 12.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCauste v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
9 N.J. Misc. 2 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 19, 1930
All extras were ordered by the defendants’ agents in charge of the defendants’ contract with the board of freeholders.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWeber-Smith v. Board of Review
337 N.J. Super. 319 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 22, 2001
The Board of Review affirmed the Appeal Tribunal. … Teichler v. Curtiss-Wright Corp., 24 N.J. 585, 592 , 133 A.2d 320 (1957); Bodnarchuk v. Board of Review, 309 N.J.Super. 399, 403 , 707 A.2d 201 (App.Div.1998); Meaney v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBonomo v. NJ State Parole Board
104 N.J. Super. 226 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 17, 1969
Kincaid v. State Parole Board, 53 N.J. Super. 526 ( App. Div. 1959); Pickering v. State, unreported, Docket No. A 88-55 ( App. … See our opinion in Roman v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 104 N.J. Super. 222 , decided simultaneously herewith.
Cited 5 timesPublishedState v. Essex Public Road Board
48 N.J.L. 366 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1886
It was held by the Supreme Court, in Wright v. … It was so held by this court at this term in Essex Public Road Board v. Speer.
Cited 2 timesPublishedHighpoint, Inc. v. Bloomfield Planning Board
80 N.J. Super. 570 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 11, 1963
In a second decision, Hilton Acres v. … Before a decision may be rendered, the board, sitting as a body, must hear the matter as though on original application. See Kempner v. Edison Tp., 54 N.J. Super. 408 ( App. Div. 1959); Stafford Smith v.
Cited 4 timesPublished420 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 2011
In McDermott v. … As our Supreme Court found in Owens v. C. & R.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcDonald v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
99 N.J.L. 393 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1924
McDonald v. Board of Freeholders of Hudson, 98 N. J. L. 386. Upon a review in this court the judgment of the Supreme Court granting the peremptory’ writ was reversed. Ante p. 110. … Central Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 75 N. J. L. 771.
Cited 8 timesPublishedState v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
47 N.J.L. 417 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1885
State v. *422 Rahway, 4 Vroom 110 ; Cleveland v. Board of Finance, 9 Id. 259 . … Downing, v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBuckalew v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
91 N.J.L. 517 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 17, 1918
This was the doctrine approved by the Supreme Court, after much research, and a careful consideration of the authorities in the case of The Board of Freeholders of Sussex v. Strader, 18 N. J. … In Jersey City v. Kiernan, 50 N. J.
Cited 11 timesPublishedSandford v. Board of Township Committee
51 N.J.L. 473 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1889
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna