Case law

Brown v. Brown

225 A.D. 690 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1928

Brown v. Brown

161 A.D. 948 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1914

Brown v. Brown

117 A.D. 199 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 25, 1907

(dissenting): I am in accord with the views expressed by the justice at Special Term respecting the construction to be given to the agreement entered into between the defendant, Augusta Andree (Brown) and Paul S. … Brown to assert any claim she may have to share in the personal estate of her deceased husband; and while the action is in partition and the judgment merely declares that the 3,.000 Swedish crowns, or its equivalent, and

Brown v. Brown

5 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 44 · New York Court of Chancery · Oct 7, 1845

Brown v. . Brown

6 N.Y. 106 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1851

Although commenced before, it was tried and decided in the supreme court after the enactment of the code, and to such a case this court has decided that the code applies. ( Grover v. Coon, 1 Comst . 536.)

Brown v. Brown

15 N.J. Eq. 499 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1862

The decree of the Chancellor was reversed by the following vote: For reversa l—Judges Brown, Combs, Elmer, Haines, Kennedy, Ogden, Van Dyke, Vredenburgh, Whelpley, Wood—10. For affirmomce —N one.

Brown v. Brown

22 Neb. 703 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1888

The defendant Brown has filed a very lengthy answer, which need not be noticed here. On the trial of the cause the court found “that the plaintiff, Eliza H. … pay the said sum of money in its possession, one-half of the same to-said plaintiff and one-half to said defendant Brown, as-aforesaid, and that the said plaintiff and the said defendant-Brown should pay the costs of suit

Brown v. Brown

5 Mass. 320 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 15, 1809

Brown v. Brown

620 So. 2d 881 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jul 1, 1993

In re Brown, Royce M.; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 93-CA-0046; Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 34,457.

Brown v. Brown

1 How. N.P. 94 · Circuit Court of the 3rd Circuit of Michigan · Feb 6, 1876

Brown, and no one else but him has power to settle,” thus taking the case from the hands of an officer of this court, amenable to this *98 court for Ms acts, and placing it in the hands of a person Over whom this court can

Brown v. Brown

544 So. 2d 141 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1989

Brown v. Brown

317 N.C. 332 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1986

Brown v. Brown

786 So. 2d 611 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 12, 2001

See Laney v. Laney, 487 So.2d 1109, 1111 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) quoting Mouzon v. … See Cox v. Clark, 682 So.2d 653 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Archbold Health Servs., Inc. v. Future Tech Bus. Sys., Inc., 659 So.2d 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Tipton v.

Brown v. Brown

299 Ky. 388 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · Feb 13, 1945

Brown was 47 years of age and had one child 14 or 15 years old. Brown was 66 years of age and had reared several children, all of whom were grown and married in 1934. … Brown’s name. A small house was built on this lot, partly from lumber brought by Brown from his Letcher County farm. Mrs. Brown said she paid for the hauling of the lumber and also $10 on a lumber bill.

Brown v. Brown

210 Mich. 595 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1920

Brown, and each heir or assignee was made a party thereto. Neither the administrator nor the estate was made a party. … While these orders are discretionary with the court and are not reviewable, except for abuse of discretion (Smith v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 82 Mich. 93 ; Sanborn v. St.

Brown v. Brown

18 Tenn. 84 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1836

The bill charges that the defendant, Elizabeth Brown, got possession of the said will immediately after the death of her father, and that she and her husband, Charles V. … Brown, have suppressed or destroyed it, so that it cannot now be found. The answer of Charles V. Brown denies any knowledge of the existence of a will, or that he had any agency in its destruction.

Brown v. Brown

308 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1983

Brown v. Brown

75 S.C. 25 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jul 24, 1906

Brown is entitled to. ......$ 280 40 W. F. Brown is entitled to. ......... 280 40 James H. Brown is entitled to>..... 280 40 Louisa A. Brown to................. 140 20 Margaret A. … This exception is overruled. 4 V. “Because said order is contrary to' the terras of the will of John A. Brown, deceased, and the decree of Judge Norton and Judge Townsend.”

Brown v. Brown

4 Pa. D. & C.2d 524 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County · Jun 21, 1955

Brown, filed her complaint in divorce on February 11, 1955, against defendant, John Paul Brown. … In the case of Herman v. Herman, 70 D. & C. 215, the complaint was filed on July 26, 1949, and the sheriff’s return of “Not Found” was made on August 10, 1949.

Brown v. Brown

211 Pa. Super. 754 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1968