Case law

State ex rel. Darnell v. State Board of Education

475 P.2d 181 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1970

The State Board of Education shall furnish the State Auditor with a copy of the appor-tionments made for the salary of the County Superintendent of each county and upon the submission of claims by the State Board of Education … BERRY, V. C. J., and BLACKBIRD, JACKSON, HODGES, and Mc-INERNEY, JJ., concur.

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Savage

32 Okla. 376 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1912

Wigmore, in his work on Evidence (vol. 4, sec. 2572), says: “The ordinances and regulation of local boards and councils are not noticed” —citing Moore v. Mayor, 107 Ga. 704 , 33 S. E. 435 ; Watt v. … Co. v. Davis & Young, 26 Okla. 359 , 109 Pac. 551 , and followed in A., T. & S. P. Ry. Co. v. Ward, ante, 120 Pac. 982, and in St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. Brown, supra. In the Davis & Young case, supra, Mr.

Board of Com'rs of Le Flore County v. Lucas

146 Okla. 8 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 11, 1930

Russell v. Hyer, supra. … Co. v. Green, 133 Okla. 58 , 270 Pac. 1111 ; First Nat Bank v. O’Bannon, 128 Okla, 16, 260 Pac. 1062 ; Morris v. West Pub. Co., 118 Okla. 237 , 247 Pac. 52 ; Town v. Crawford, 106 Okla. 254 , 234 Pac. 208 .

Board of Co. Com'rs of Okmulgee Co. v. Ming

195 Okla. 234 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1945

v. … Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Colored Hospital Ass’n, supra.

Stockton v. Board of County Com'rs of Payne Cty.

363 P.2d 504 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1961

We are confirmed in this view by this statement by this court in Salyer v. … See Britton v. Morris, 59 Okl. 162 , 158 P. 358 ; Brook v. Horton, 68 Cal. 554 , 10 P. 204 , and Commonwealth v. Inhabitants of Westborough, 3 Mass. 406 .

Weisbender v. School Dist. No. 6 of Caddo County

24 Okla. 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1909

This question was passed on by the Supreme Court of the territory of Oklahoma in a number of cases, among which may be noted the following: Board of County Commissioners of Logan County v. … Board of County Com’rs v. Harvey, supra. On the authority of the foregoing adjudications, the contention of defendant in error is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed.

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization

170 Okla. 516 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1935

Brady, 42 Okla. 807 , 143 P. 6 ; Huckins Hotel Co. v. Board of County Com’rs, 64 Okla. 235 , 166 P. 1043 . In Thompson v. Brady, supra, the court had under consideration sections 7368, 7369, 7370, Rev. … Consolidated School District, 79 Okla. 115 , 191 P. 737 ; Brown v. Holloway's Estate (Colo.) 108 P. 25 ; In re Sharp (Idaho) 96 P. 563 , 18 L. R. A. (N. S.) 886; State v. District Court (Mont.) 99 P. 139 : Garcia v.

Maltsberger v. Board of County Commissioners of Pawnee County

70 O.B.A.J. 2496 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1999

Maltsberger suggested that the case of Childs v. State ex rel. Okla. … Porter v. Ferrell, 1998 OK 41, ¶ 9 , 959 P.2d 576, 578 (citation omitted).

Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund v. Naughton

197 Okla. 592 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1946

Clark, who are widows of deceased members of the Fire Department of the City of Tulsa, brought their separate actions in mandamus against the Board of Trustees of the Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of the City of Tulsa … Franklin v. Sovereign Camp W.O.W., 145 Okla. 159 , 291 P. 513 ; State v. Ward, 189 Okla. 532 , 118 P. 2d 216 .

State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Shelton

727 P.2d 103 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1986

See also Herndon v. Board of Commissioners, 158 Okl. 14 , 11 P.2d 939 (1932). … In 1940, for instance, the supreme court of this state, in Board of County Commissioners v.

City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma State Pension & Retirement Board

674 P.2d 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1983

In City of Wilburton v. … In Oklahoma Railway Co. v.

Hubbard v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension

322 P.2d 207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1957

Hubbard, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, who sought the issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel the Board of Trustees of the Police Pension and Retirement System of the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, hereinafter referred … Co. v. Parks, 182 Okl. 598 , 78 P.2d 791 ; Tobly v. Dekinder, 85 Okl. 288 , 206 P. 201 . .Appeal dismissed. . WELCH, C. J., and HALLEY, JOHNSON, BLACKBIRD, ’ JACKSON and CARLILE, JJ., concur. CORN, V. C. J., dissents.

Board of Trustees of Crutcho Township v. State Industrial Com.

149 Okla. 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1931

Slack, board of county Commissioners of Oklahoma county, O. W. … In the case of Whiteneck v.

Board of Com'rs v. Woodford Consolidated School Dist. No. 36

165 Okla. 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1933

Board of Education, 113 Okla. 217 , 242 P. 173 ; Chandler. Co. Supt., v. Barber, 113 Okla. 222 , 241 P. 145 ; Weathers v. Liebhart, 129 Okla. 185 , 263 P. 1108 ; School Dist. No. 9 v. … If the statute as construed by this court in Board of County Com’rs of Garfield County v.

Peck-Williamson Heating & Ventilating Co. v. Board of Education

6 Okla. 279 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1897

The board of education was authorized under the law to incur a liability in behalf of the school district which represented, not exceeding the sum of $45,640. … Ice Co, v. Parker, 8 Bos. 688; 21 How. Prac. Rep. 302; Marginthan v. King, 24 Pac. 1049 , [Col.;] Robberts v. Donovan, 9 Pac.

Board of Com'rs v. Indian Terr. Illuminating Oil Co.

159 Okla. 6 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 17, 1932

S. v. Ransom, 263 U. S. 691 , 68 L. Ed. 508 , 44 Sup. Ct. Rep. 230, affirming (C. C. A. 8th) 284 Fed. 108 ; U. S. v. Brown (C. C. A. 8th) 8 F. (2d) 564; U. S. v. Gray (C. C. A. 8th) 284 Fed. 103 ; U. S. v. Mummert (C. … Fund v. Board of Assessors, 85 La. Ann. 668 , as follows : “ ‘Exemptions from taxation are always strictly construed against the exemption, nothing can be supplied by intendment or inference.’

Kinney v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County, Okl.

66 O.B.A.J. 1487 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1995

Knudsen, seeks review of the trial court’s order which denied their motion for summary judgment but granted the summary judgment motion of Appellee, Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Oklahoma (the Board). … Hamilton , at 16; Nesbitt v.

Kline v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

759 P.2d 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1988

I In Oklahoma Water Resources Board & Mobil Oil Corp. v. … We held in Anderson-Prichard Oil Corporation v.

Clark v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety

153 P.3d 77 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 2007

Second, he argues the checkpoint fails all three tiers of the reasonableness test established in Brown v. … Clark contends that the checkpoint in this case fails the well-established test for determining the reasonableness of a warrantless seizure articulated by the Court in Brown v.

Butler v. Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists

619 P.2d 1262 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1980

These same arguments were made against The Board of Governors of Registered Dentists in a case recently decided by this Court, Berry v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists of Oklahoma, 611 P.2d 628 (Okl.1980). … The same argument was made in Berry v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, supra.