Case law

Brown v. . Brown

6 N.Y. 106 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1851

Although commenced before, it was tried and decided in the supreme court after the enactment of the code, and to such a case this court has decided that the code applies. ( Grover v. Coon, 1 Comst . 536.)

Brown v. Brown

33 Miss. 39 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1857

This was a petition filed in the Probate Court of Marshall *40 county, by ..the appellant, as executor of the last will and testament of John Brown, deceased, alleging the insufficiency of the personal estate of the testator

Brown v. Brown

123 Miss. 125 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1920

Brown, filed a suit for divorce in the chancery court and for custody of her child, and was allowed alimony in the sum of sixty dollars per month and attorney’s fees of one hundred and seventy-five dollars.

Brown v. Brown

15 N.J. Eq. 499 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1862

The decree of the Chancellor was reversed by the following vote: For reversa l—Judges Brown, Combs, Elmer, Haines, Kennedy, Ogden, Van Dyke, Vredenburgh, Whelpley, Wood—10. For affirmomce —N one.

United States v. Jovanovic

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2025

See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … See also Thorp v. District of Columbia, 142 F. Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v.

Brown v. Brown

22 Neb. 703 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1888

The defendant Brown has filed a very lengthy answer, which need not be noticed here. On the trial of the cause the court found “that the plaintiff, Eliza H. … pay the said sum of money in its possession, one-half of the same to-said plaintiff and one-half to said defendant Brown, as-aforesaid, and that the said plaintiff and the said defendant-Brown should pay the costs of suit

Bolieu v. Our Lady of Compassion Care Center

983 P.2d 1270 · Alaska Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1999

Davis v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Brown

544 So. 2d 141 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1989

Brown v. Brown

142 A.D.2d 624 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 11, 1988

The Supreme Court found she was not “living with another man” and granted her cross motion for support arrears (see, Brown v Brown, supra). … v Brown, 122 AD2d 762, 764 ).

Brown v. Brown

163 Mich. 341 · Michigan Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1910

Brown, deceased, and the representatives of his minor children, and also William J. … The banker who drew the deed and contract at the request of the deceased son, Levi Brown, his father, and Mr.

Brown v. Brown

175 Mich. 442 · Michigan Supreme Court · May 28, 1913

The bill of complaint is filed by the widow and administratrix of the estate of Walter Brown, deceased, against Albert and Frank Brown. … Levi Brown had been a partner in the company, but had sold his interest, and on April 23, 1907, defendant Albert Brown had a one-fifth interest in the business, and Walter Brown, Harvey Brown, and Frank Brown owned in equal

Brown v. Brown

317 N.C. 332 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1986

Brown v. Brown

430 So. 2d 140 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1983

City of *142 New Orleans v. LeBourgeois, 50 La.Ann. 591 , 23 So. 542 (1898); cf. Bell v. Holdcraft, 196 So. 379 (La.App.1940); Sandfield Oil and Gas Co. v. Paul, 7 So.2d 725 (La.App.1942); Vinson v. … Johnson v. Jones-Journet, supra. In Pryor v.

Brown v. Brown

1 How. N.P. 94 · Circuit Court of the 3rd Circuit of Michigan · Feb 6, 1876

Brown, and no one else but him has power to settle,” thus taking the case from the hands of an officer of this court, amenable to this *98 court for Ms acts, and placing it in the hands of a person Over whom this court can

Brown v. Brown

18 Tenn. 84 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1836

The bill charges that the defendant, Elizabeth Brown, got possession of the said will immediately after the death of her father, and that she and her husband, Charles V. … Brown, have suppressed or destroyed it, so that it cannot now be found. The answer of Charles V. Brown denies any knowledge of the existence of a will, or that he had any agency in its destruction.

Brown v. Brown

620 So. 2d 881 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jul 1, 1993

In re Brown, Royce M.; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 93-CA-0046; Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 34,457.

Brown v. Brown

210 Mich. 595 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1920

Brown, and each heir or assignee was made a party thereto. Neither the administrator nor the estate was made a party. … While these orders are discretionary with the court and are not reviewable, except for abuse of discretion (Smith v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 82 Mich. 93 ; Sanborn v. St.

Brown v. Brown

308 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1983

Brown v. Brown

75 S.C. 25 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jul 24, 1906

Brown is entitled to. ......$ 280 40 W. F. Brown is entitled to. ......... 280 40 James H. Brown is entitled to>..... 280 40 Louisa A. Brown to................. 140 20 Margaret A. … This exception is overruled. 4 V. “Because said order is contrary to' the terras of the will of John A. Brown, deceased, and the decree of Judge Norton and Judge Townsend.”

Brown v. Brown

786 So. 2d 611 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 12, 2001

See Laney v. Laney, 487 So.2d 1109, 1111 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) quoting Mouzon v. … See Cox v. Clark, 682 So.2d 653 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Archbold Health Servs., Inc. v. Future Tech Bus. Sys., Inc., 659 So.2d 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Tipton v.