Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

7.40s

  • Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma v. Childers

    197 Okla. 350 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 9, 1946

    App.) 185 S.W. 921 ), and related corporations (Kelley v. Heitman, 220 Ind. 625 , 44 N.E. 2d 981 ), it means identical with or an equal part. … It clearly falls within the scope of the function of that board and the institution of higher education it operates.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of Equalization of Oklahoma Co. v. First State Bank

    77 Okla. 291 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1920

    Grayson v. Thompson, 77 Oklahoma, 186 Pac. 236 ; Board of County Com’rs of Creek County v. Alexander, 58 Okla. 128 , 159 Pac. 311 ; Tiger v. Western Invest Co., 221 U. S. 286 , 55 L. Ed. 738 . … Bank of Ossining v. Board of Assessors, 182 N. Y. 460 , 75 N.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF TULSA COUNTY v. Morgan

    324 P.2d 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1958

    In the early case of Board of Com’rs of Logan County v. … Oklahoma County v. Queen City Lodge No. 197, I.O.O.F., 195 Okl. 131 , 156 P.2d 340 ; Board of Co. Com’rs Muskogee County v. Fink, 45 Okl. 121 , 145 P. 413 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Surety Co. v. State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rs

    111 Okla. 180 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1925

    Schilling v. Oklahoma City et al., 67 Okla. 18 , 168 Pac. 227 ; State ex rel. Morrison v. … Atty., et al. v. Woolsey et al., 35 Okla. 545 , 130 Pac. 934 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. State ex rel. Gleason, Co. Atty., 52 Okla. 614 , 153 Pac. 625 ).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Planning & Resources Board v. Smith

    317 P.2d 219 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1957

    Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board, hereinafter referred to-as plaintiff, to quiet title to 240 acres of land in Latimer County, Oklahoma, as against Otto Smith and Russell Austin,, hereinafter referred to as defendants … 5, 1938, conveyed the same to said State of Oklahoma for park purposes; that such gift and deed evidencing the same were duly accepted by the State of Oklahoma, acting by and through the Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • City of Yale v. Excise Board of Payne County

    156 Okla. 192 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1932

    The plaintiff filed its petition for writ of mandamus against the excise board of Payne county in the district court of said county, asking that the excise board be required to approve the estimate as made and submitted by … Excise Board of Woodward County v. Reid, 143 Okla. 204 , 288 P. 458 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Seber v. Board of County Com'rs of Creek County

    38 F. Supp. 731 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 10, 1941

    Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. United States, 10 Cir., 94 F.2d 450 ; McGugin v. United States, 10 Cir., 109 F.2d 94 ; United States v. Fixico, 10 Cir., 115 F.2d 389 . … Board of Commissioners of Osage County, D.C., 26 F.Supp. 270, 273 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

    697 P.2d 533 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1985

    Industrial Commission, 534 S.W.2d 613 (Mo.Ct.App.1976); Gaunce v. Board of Labor Appeals, 164 Mont. 445 , 524 P.2d 1108 (1974); Bristol v. Hanlon, 210 Neb. 37 , 312 N.W.2d 694 (1981); Barnum v. … Williams, 84 Nev. 37 , 436 P.2d 219 (1968); In re Miller, 122 N.H. 993 , 453 A.2d 1269 (1982); Board of Review v. Bogue Elec. Co., 37 NJ.Super. 535, 117 A.2d 669 (1955); Mitchell v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Dolese Bros. Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Comanche Cty.

    151 Okla. 110 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1931

    To the same effect is the case of Central Light & Fuel Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 51 Okla. 407 , 151 Pac. 1170 . … In the case of Hays v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Board of County Commissioners of Stephens County

    439 P.2d 946 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1968

    In Butler v. Board of County Com’rs of Muskogee County, Okl., 413 P.2d 552 , the Board re-districted the county and placed a portion of the City of Muskogee in each district. … Gen. v.

    Overruled in part by Ballard v. Christian, 1969 Okla. LEXIS 318 (1969)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kline v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

    646 P.2d 1258 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1981

    Bureau, supra, at 456, quoting from Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Fed. C. Com’n, 68 App.D.C. 282 , 96 F.2d 554, 559 (U.S.Ct.App.D.C.1938) Cert. Denied as Gross v. … Brown v. Banking Board, 512 P.2d 166 (Okl.1973).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Moser v. Board of Trustees of Town of Thomas

    48 Okla. 224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1915

    United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Ballard, 44 Okla. 807 , 145 Pac. 396 ; Michael v. Isom, 43 Okla. 708 , 143 Pac. 1053 ; Syfert v. Murphy, 45 Okla. 137 , 144 Pac. 1022 ; Vaught v. … Miners’ Bank, 27 Okla. 100 , 111 Pac. 214 ; Burns v. Toney, 27 Okla. 728 , 117 Pac. 209 ; Price v. Covington, 29 Okla. 854 , 119 Pac. 626 ; Bank v. Mergenthaler, 31 Okla. 533 , 122 Pac. 507 ; John v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brusha Et Ux. v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City

    41 Okla. 595 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1913

    Co. v. Swinney, 38 Iowa, 182 ; Ottumwa, etc., R. *600 Co. v. McWilliams, 71 Iowa, 164 , 32 N. W. 315 ; Randall v. Texas Cen. R. Co., 63 Tex. 586 . … Kanaga v. Railroad, 76 Mo. 207 ; Provolt v. Railroad, 57 Mo. 257 ; Masterson v. Railroad, 72 Mo. 343 ; [Reichert v. St. L. & S. F. R. Co., 51 Ark. 491 , 11 S. W. 696 ] 5 L. R. A. 183, and trotes.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Fishman Realty Inv. Co. v. Board of Trustees, Etc.

    149 Okla. 293 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1931

    City National Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233 , 253 Pac. 481 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Ed. of City of Oilton v. Short

    126 Okla. 70 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1926

    Board of Education v. West, 29 Okla. 503 , 118 Pac. 146 , and In re Application of State to Issue Bonds to Fund Indebtedness, 33 Okla. 797 , 127 Pac. 1065 (and cases therein cited). … It is suggested by counsel in their briefs that the trial court in refusing to grant the writ was controlled by the decision of this court in Eaton, County Treasurer, v. St.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund v. Naughton

    180 Okla. 270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 1937

    City v. … J., BAXLESS, V. C. J., and BUSBY, PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Guthrie Gas, Light, Fuel & Improvement Co. v. Board of Education

    64 Okla. 157 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1917

    In September, 1909, the Guthrie Light, Gas, Fuel & Improvement Company and the board of education of the city of Guthrie entered into a contract under which the board of education installed a system for -heating by natural … Co. v. Siegel Cooper Co., supra; Superior v. Douglas Co. Tel. Co., 141 Was. 363, 122 N. W. 1023 ; Belfast v. Belfast Water Co., supra; Hays v. Pennsylvania Co. (C. O.) 12 Fed. 309 ; U. S. v. Chicago & N. W. R.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma Corrugated Steel & Iron Co. v. Board of Com'rs

    170 Okla. 618 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1935

    This action was commenced in the district court of Cherokee county by the Oklahoma Corrugated Steel & Iron Company, as plaintiff, against the board of ■county commissioners of Cherokee county, as defendant. … In the case of Fabric Fire Hose Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund v. Templeton

    184 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1939

    Steck v. Prentice (Colo.) 95 P. 552 ; Norris v. Cross, 25 Okla. 287 , 105 P. 1000 ; Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Pack, 6 W. Va. 397, 403 ; Satcher v. … Co. et al. v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Community Bankers Ass'n of Oklahoma v. Oklahoma State Banking Board

    70 O.B.A.J. 1010 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1999

    Tinker Inv. & Mortg. v. … The Board’s Order is outside the law and therefore resulted in unlawful competition in violation of the legal rights of Appellants. See Bank of the Lakes v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.