Case law

Hurd v. Chase

100 Me. 561 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 21, 1905

Lamb v. Foss, 21 Maine, 240; Norton v. Webb, 35 Maine, 218; Brown v. Leach, 35 Maine, 39; Davis v. Poland, 99 Maine, 345-348. … Pillsbury v. Brown, 82 Maine, 455. It is evident that the only issue between the parties, and the only issue that needs decision, is the right of present possession.'

Gordon v. Mullaney

317 A.2d 804 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 8, 1974

Seibold v. State, 287 Ala. 549 , 253 So.2d 302 (1970); Davis v. Davis, 103 N.J.Super. 284 , 247 A.2d 139 (1968); State v. Milhollan, 50 N.D. 184 , 195 N.W. 292 (1923). … Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S. Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), and Gagnon v.

Barbour v. City of Ellsworth

67 Me. 294 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 22, 1876

This case is not distinguishable in'principle from Mitchell v. Rockland, 52 Maine, 118, and the more recent cases of Brown et ux. v. Einalhaven, 65 Maine, 402, and Lynde v. Rockland, 66 Maine, 309. … Small v. Dan ville, 51 Maine, 359, 361.

McKay v. New England Dredging Co.

93 Me. 201 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 20, 1899

Boyd v. Brown, 17 Pick. 453 ; Kent v. Whitney, 9 Allen, 62 ; Negus v. Simpson, 99 Mass. 388 . The assessment of damages set aside and a new trial ordered for the assessment of damages only.

Saunders v. MacBride Dunham Management

708 A.2d 1030 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 6, 1998

Bernard v. Cives Corp., 395 A.2d 1141, 1148 (Me.1978). … Lagasse v. Hannaford Bros. Co., 497 A.2d 1112, 1116 (Me. 1985).

Baker v. Klein

655 A.2d 367 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 8, 1995

See Procise v. Elec. Mut. Liab. Ins. Co., 494 A.2d 1375, 1381 (Me.1985). The entry is: Judgment affirmed. All concurring. 1 . … See Morgan-Leland v. Univ. of Me., 632 A.2d 748, 749 (Me.1993).

State v. Deschambault

159 Me. 216 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 17, 1963

The respondent is not charged with having pretended that he influenced the action of any Board or Committee. … State v. Paul, supra, at page 118; see State v. Perley, 86 Me. 427, 431 ; State v. Beattie, 129 Me. 229, 232 .

Cameron v. Lewiston, Brunswick & Bath Street Railway

103 Me. 482 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 25, 1908

In San Antonio v. Bryant, 30 Texas Civ. App. 437, the plaintiff was on the running board moving toward a vacant seat. … Chicago Street Railroad Co. v. Marks, 182 Ill. 15 ; Mason v. St. Railway, 190 Mass. 255 ; Nugent v. B. C. & M. Railroad, 80 Maine, 62; Withee v. Traction Company, 98 Maine, 61, and Stone v.

Dorr v. Bridge Construction Corp.

750 A.2d 597 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 19, 2000

See e.g., Lamonica v. … Section 354 has been amended to permit the Board to determine apportionment issues, P.L.1999, ch. 354, § 9. See Livingstone v. A-R Cable Servs. of Maine, 2000 ME 18, ¶ 1, n. 1 , 746 A.2d 901, 902, n. 1 .

State v. Snow

527 A.2d 750 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1987

See State v. Libby, 453 A.2d 481, 484-85 (Me.1982); State v. Smith, 379 A.2d 722, 724 (Me.1977). On appeal, the trial court’s finding of probable cause will be reversed only if “clearly erroneous.” State v. … See generally State v. Fredette, 411 A.2d 65 (Me.1979).

Shadan v. Town of Skowhegan

1997 Me. 187 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 11, 1997

(quoting Pace v. … Morrell v.

Darla J. Potter v. Great Falls Insurance Company

243 A.3d 1188 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 29, 2020

See Pomerleau v. … See Reed v.

Kormendy v. Town of Kennebunk

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 20, 2018

Adelman v. Town of Baldwin, 2000 ME 91 en: 6, n.5; Ryan v. Camden, 582 A.2d 973, 974 (Me. 1990). B. Amended Briefing Schedule The briefing schedule in this case is amended as follows: 1. … Brown v. Thaler, 2005 l'v1E 75, 1 8, 880 A.2d 1113. Failure to comply with the extended Rule 3 deadline may result in a dismissal of this action.

Niehoff v. Sahagian

149 Me. 396 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 14, 1954

“Libel and Slander,” 22, Par. 328; Patterson v. Wilkinson, 55 Me. 42 ; Bradburg v. Segal, 121 Me. 146 ; Brown v. … In principle there is no difference whether the words are supplied by a specification as in Brown v.

Curran v. Clayton

86 Me. 42 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 8, 1893

The recent case of Parvin v. Wimberg, 130 Ind. 561 (30 Am. … See also Andrews v. King, 77 Maine, 224, where the supervising power of the court was carefully considered.

State v. McDonough

468 A.2d 977 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 8, 1983

Wisconsin v. … See Davis v.

State Y. M. C. A. v. Picher

8 F. Supp. 412 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 19, 1934

Brown or Mr. Smith. … Brown, the treasurer, and Mr.

Dunn v. Town of Scarborough

329 A.2d 162 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 5, 1974

The Plaintiff appealed the issuance of the permit to the Board of Appeals, and the Board held a hearing on her appeal on a date not disclosed by the record. … The Defendants have directed our attention to Feng Yeat Chow v. Shaughnessy, 151 F.Supp. 23 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1957) and Oppenheimer v. Morton Hotel Corporation, 324 F.2d 766 (6th Cir. 1963).

Robinson v. Chase

115 Me. 165 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 22, 1916

Brown v. Keith, 14 Maine; 396; Hatch v. Hatch, 57 Maine, 283; Morse v. Morse, 62 Maine, 443; Nutter v. Taylor, 78 Maine, 424. The rule is of long standing. … It was so held, in effect, in Brown v. Keith, supra. It follows, then, that the referee in this case had authority to disallow the plaintiff’s costs in whole or in part. His report is final and must be accepted.

Long v. Town of Eliot

521 A.2d 1190 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 3, 1987

The Longs appealed the denial and applied for a variance to the Zoning Board of Appeals. After a hearing the Board of Appeals upheld the Planning Board’s interpretation of the zoning ordinance. … Grand Beach As sociation, Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard Beach, 516 A.2d 551, 554-55 (Me.1986).