Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.55s
Miller v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review
294 A.2d 365 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1972
See generally Brewster v. Kinlein, D.C.App., 209 A.2d 788, 789 (1965); Brown v. Murphy, supra; Tanner v. DeSapio, 2 Misc.2d 130, 134 , 150 N.Y.S. 2d 640, 644-645 (1956). … See also Brown v. Murphy, 34 Misc.2d 151, 158 , 224 N.Y.2d 423 , 430 (1962). .
Cited 4 timesPublished580 F.2d 675 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1978
See, Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199 , 94 S.Ct. 1055 , 39 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974); Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535 , 79 S.Ct. 968 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1959). … Williamson v. Lee Optical Co., 1955, 348 U.S. 483, 489 , 75 S.Ct. 461, 465 , 99 L.Ed. 563 . See Katzenbach v. Morgan, 1966, 384 U.S. 641 , 86 S.Ct. 1717 , 16 L.Ed.2d 828 ; Roschen v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees, Nat. Shopmen v. Northern Steel
657 F. Supp. 2d 155 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2009
See Bowers v. … He remained president of Oswego Amusements, Inc., and later served as Chairman of the Board. [I]n 1992, the three sons of George H.
Cited 7 timesPublishedAlaska Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
545 F.2d 194 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 1976
Burson, 402 U.S. 535 , 91 S.Ct. 1586 , 29 L.Ed.2d 90 (1971); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); and Perry v. … This concept of property was further refined in Board of Regents v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHoage v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of DC
714 A.2d 776 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1998
Baumgartner v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 527 A.2d 313, 316 (D.C.1987) (citations and footnote omitted). … E.g., Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc., 481 U.S. 252, 264 , 107 S.Ct. 1740 , 95 L.Ed.2d 239 (1987); Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985); Barry v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedJones v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board
455 A.2d 896 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1983
I The Board’s decision must be affirmed on appeal if it is supported by substantial evidence. Pillis v. District of Colombia Hackers’ License Appeal Board, D.C.App., 366 A.2d 1094, 1095 (1976); Proctor v. … Liberty v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 410 A.2d 191, 192 (1979). Here, there is no such evidence.
Cited 5 timesPublished887 F.2d 308 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 13, 1989
Camera Corp. v. … In Conair v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedAeronautical Radio, Inc. v. National Mediation Board
380 F.2d 624 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1967
Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297, 305 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943); Railway Clerks v. … Clerks, etc. v. National Mediation Board, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 55, 58 , 374 F.2d 269, 272 (1966).
Cited 7 timesPublishedAchagzai v. Broadcasting Board of Governors
District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2018
(quoting Jones v. D.C. Dep’t of Corr., 429 F.3d 276, 281 (D.C. Cir. 2005)); Brown v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp. Medstar Health, 828 F. … (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999))); Moore v. Ashcroft, 401 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRailway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board
583 F. Supp. 279 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 1984
, Adjustment Board [NRAB], Regional Adjustment Boards established under paragraph (w) of section 3 [of this title], and boards of arbitration, in accordance with the provisions of this section and sections 3 and 7 [of this … were “functioning” as Board members.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDavidson v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
617 A.2d 977 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1992
Porianda v. … See Maynard v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedMathew Enterprise, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
771 F.3d 812 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 7, 2014
National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, No. 12-1281, slip op. at 20, 134 S. … Accord Gestamp South Carolina, L.L.C. v. National Labor Relations Board, Nos. 11- 2362, 12-1041, 2014 WL 5013049, at *2 (4th Cir.
Cited 6 timesPublishedJulius G. Getman v. National Labor Relations Board
450 F.2d 670 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 31, 1971
Sea also Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation Board, 138 U.S. App.D.C. 147, 151, 425 F.2d 578, 582 (1970) ; K. Davis, supra Note 1, § 3A.19. But see Bareeloneta Shoe Corp. v. … Tlie Board maintains at page 16 of its brief, citing General Services Administration v.
Cited 214 timesPublishedMelodi Navab-Safavi v. Broadcasting Board of Govenors
637 F.3d 311 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 1, 2011
At the time of the events under litigation, plaintiff Melodi Navab-Safavi worked as a contractor with the Broadcasting Board of Governors (“BBG” or “the Board”). … Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968). See also Bd. of Cty. Comm’rs v.
Cited 51 timesPublishedWilliams v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
804 A.2d 316 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 2002
In Brousseau v. … Lawson v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDesert Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board
91 F.3d 187 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 1996
In reviewing such claims, the Board held that it is the employer’s burden to prove a clear and present danger of a conflict of interest. Id.; see also Highland Hosp. v. NLRB, 861 F.2d 56, 58 (2d Cir.1988); NLRB v. … The litigation, which was pending at the time of the Board hearing, resulted in a temporary restraining order, Costello v. Nichols, No.C-93-0041 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 1993), and a preliminary injunction, Costello v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBrotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. National Mediation Board
88 F.2d 757 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 21, 1936
Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation, etc., (C.C.A.) 84 F.(2d) 641, 645 . … Justice Brandeis in United States v. Abilene & S. R. Co., 265 U.S. 274, 288 , 44 S.Ct. 565 , 68 L.Ed. 1016 , “Nothing can be treated as evidence which is not introduced as such.”
Cited 24 timesPublishedDwyer v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
320 A.2d 306 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 24, 1974
[Clouser v. David, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 12, 13 , 309 F.2d 233, 234 (1962); emphasis added.] 5 See also Taylor v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjust., D.C.App., 308 A.2d 230 (1973). Moreover, as we held in Palmer v. … We recognize, of course, that Clouser v. David, supra, constitutes the case law of the District of Columbia which we are required to follow. M.A.P. v. Ryan, D.C.App., 285 A.2d 310 (1971).
Cited 3 timesPublishedGuard Publishing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
571 F.3d 53 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 2009
Corp. v. NLRB, 334 F.3d 99, 108 n.4 (D.C. … Guard, 351 N.L.R.B. at 1137 (ALJ Op.); see NLRB v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedMendelson v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
645 A.2d 1090 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 1994
The Board, in its order, summarized the parties’ respective positions as follows: 11. … Glenbrook Road Ass’n v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 605 A.2d 22, 31 (D.C.1992) (quoting Levy v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 570 A.2d 739, 746 (D.C.1990)); see also Draude v.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna