Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

0.55s

  • Miller v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    294 A.2d 365 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1972

    See generally Brewster v. Kinlein, D.C.App., 209 A.2d 788, 789 (1965); Brown v. Murphy, supra; Tanner v. DeSapio, 2 Misc.2d 130, 134 , 150 N.Y.S. 2d 640, 644-645 (1956). … See also Brown v. Murphy, 34 Misc.2d 151, 158 , 224 N.Y.2d 423 , 430 (1962). .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Eastern Canvas Products, Inc. v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense. Eastern Canvas Products, Inc. v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense

    580 F.2d 675 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1978

    See, Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199 , 94 S.Ct. 1055 , 39 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974); Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535 , 79 S.Ct. 968 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1959). … Williamson v. Lee Optical Co., 1955, 348 U.S. 483, 489 , 75 S.Ct. 461, 465 , 99 L.Ed. 563 . See Katzenbach v. Morgan, 1966, 384 U.S. 641 , 86 S.Ct. 1717 , 16 L.Ed.2d 828 ; Roschen v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees, Nat. Shopmen v. Northern Steel

    657 F. Supp. 2d 155 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2009

    See Bowers v. … He remained president of Oswego Amusements, Inc., and later served as Chairman of the Board. [I]n 1992, the three sons of George H.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    545 F.2d 194 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 1976

    Burson, 402 U.S. 535 , 91 S.Ct. 1586 , 29 L.Ed.2d 90 (1971); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); and Perry v. … This concept of property was further refined in Board of Regents v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hoage v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of DC

    714 A.2d 776 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1998

    Baumgartner v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 527 A.2d 313, 316 (D.C.1987) (citations and footnote omitted). … E.g., Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc., 481 U.S. 252, 264 , 107 S.Ct. 1740 , 95 L.Ed.2d 239 (1987); Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985); Barry v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jones v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board

    455 A.2d 896 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1983

    I The Board’s decision must be affirmed on appeal if it is supported by substantial evidence. Pillis v. District of Colombia Hackers’ License Appeal Board, D.C.App., 366 A.2d 1094, 1095 (1976); Proctor v. … Liberty v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 410 A.2d 191, 192 (1979). Here, there is no such evidence.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Clark & Wilkins Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Shopmen's Local Union No. 455, Intervenors

    887 F.2d 308 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 13, 1989

    Camera Corp. v. … In Conair v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. National Mediation Board

    380 F.2d 624 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1967

    Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297, 305 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943); Railway Clerks v. … Clerks, etc. v. National Mediation Board, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 55, 58 , 374 F.2d 269, 272 (1966).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Achagzai v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2018

    (quoting Jones v. D.C. Dep’t of Corr., 429 F.3d 276, 281 (D.C. Cir. 2005)); Brown v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp. Medstar Health, 828 F. … (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999))); Moore v. Ashcroft, 401 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board

    583 F. Supp. 279 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 1984

    , Adjustment Board [NRAB], Regional Adjustment Boards established under paragraph (w) of section 3 [of this title], and boards of arbitration, in accordance with the provisions of this section and sections 3 and 7 [of this … were “functioning” as Board members.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Davidson v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    617 A.2d 977 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1992

    Porianda v. … See Maynard v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mathew Enterprise, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    771 F.3d 812 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 7, 2014

    National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, No. 12-1281, slip op. at 20, 134 S. … Accord Gestamp South Carolina, L.L.C. v. National Labor Relations Board, Nos. 11- 2362, 12-1041, 2014 WL 5013049, at *2 (4th Cir.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Julius G. Getman v. National Labor Relations Board

    450 F.2d 670 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 31, 1971

    Sea also Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation Board, 138 U.S. App.D.C. 147, 151, 425 F.2d 578, 582 (1970) ; K. Davis, supra Note 1, § 3A.19. But see Bareeloneta Shoe Corp. v. … Tlie Board maintains at page 16 of its brief, citing General Services Administration v.

    Cited 214 timesPublished
  • Melodi Navab-Safavi v. Broadcasting Board of Govenors

    637 F.3d 311 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 1, 2011

    At the time of the events under litigation, plaintiff Melodi Navab-Safavi worked as a contractor with the Broadcasting Board of Governors (“BBG” or “the Board”). … Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968). See also Bd. of Cty. Comm’rs v.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Williams v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

    804 A.2d 316 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 2002

    In Brousseau v. … Lawson v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Desert Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board

    91 F.3d 187 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 1996

    In reviewing such claims, the Board held that it is the employer’s burden to prove a clear and present danger of a conflict of interest. Id.; see also Highland Hosp. v. NLRB, 861 F.2d 56, 58 (2d Cir.1988); NLRB v. … The litigation, which was pending at the time of the Board hearing, resulted in a temporary restraining order, Costello v. Nichols, No.C-93-0041 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 1993), and a preliminary injunction, Costello v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. National Mediation Board

    88 F.2d 757 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 21, 1936

    Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation, etc., (C.C.A.) 84 F.(2d) 641, 645 . … Justice Brandeis in United States v. Abilene & S. R. Co., 265 U.S. 274, 288 , 44 S.Ct. 565 , 68 L.Ed. 1016 , “Nothing can be treated as evidence which is not introduced as such.”

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Dwyer v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    320 A.2d 306 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 24, 1974

    [Clouser v. David, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 12, 13 , 309 F.2d 233, 234 (1962); emphasis added.] 5 See also Taylor v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjust., D.C.App., 308 A.2d 230 (1973). Moreover, as we held in Palmer v. … We recognize, of course, that Clouser v. David, supra, constitutes the case law of the District of Columbia which we are required to follow. M.A.P. v. Ryan, D.C.App., 285 A.2d 310 (1971).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Guard Publishing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    571 F.3d 53 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 2009

    Corp. v. NLRB, 334 F.3d 99, 108 n.4 (D.C. … Guard, 351 N.L.R.B. at 1137 (ALJ Op.); see NLRB v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Mendelson v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    645 A.2d 1090 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 1994

    The Board, in its order, summarized the parties’ respective positions as follows: 11. … Glenbrook Road Ass’n v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 605 A.2d 22, 31 (D.C.1992) (quoting Levy v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 570 A.2d 739, 746 (D.C.1990)); see also Draude v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.