Case law

State v. Brown

306 Mo. 532 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1924

[State v. Meek, 70 Mo. 1 . c. 357; State *536 v. Shiflett, 20 Mo. 415 .] … Proc. (3 Ed.) secs. 632-636; United States v. Cook, 17 Wall. 168 ; State v. Buford, 10 Mo. 704 ; State v. Shiflett, 20 Mo. 417 ; State v. Cox, 32 Mo. 566 ; State v. Sutton, 24 Mo. 377 ; State v.

Brown v. Bryan

419 S.W.2d 62 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1967

Brown, Martin v. Turner, Mo., 306 S.W.2d 473, 477 [2-3], and the picture of the interior of the car was a fair and accurate representation of the interior of the car from which Mrs. Brown fell. … v.

Lucas v. Brown

127 Mo. App. 645 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1908

(Mich.) 951; Merrill v. Townsend, 5 Paige (N. Y.) 80; Croom v. Morrissey, 63 N. C. 591 ; Wright v. Wheeler, 8 Ired. (N. C.) 184; Miller v. Hall, 1 Spears (S. C.) 1; Jewett v. Garrett, 47 Fed. Rep. 625; McWilliams v. … (Pa.) 276; Craighead v. Martin, 25 Minn. 41 ; Seurer v. Horst, 31 Minn. 479 ; Phinney v. Donahue, 67 Ia. 192 ; Garrison v. Hoyt, 25 Mich. 509 ; Clark v. Lyman, 10 Pick. (Mass.) 45; Abney v. Ohio Lumber Co., 45 W.

State v. Brown

404 S.W.2d 179 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 13, 1966

, then you will find the defendant Richard Brown not guilty.” … He relies on Sutter v.

Waters v. Brown

44 Mo. 302 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1869

(Douglass v. Stephens, 18 Mo. 362 .)

Gunby v. Brown

86 Mo. 253 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1885

McClurg v. Dollarhide, 51 Mo. 347 . The execution on the other judgment was issued and sale made after the death of Rogers. Generally such sale is void, Wernecke v. Wood, 58 Mo. 352 ; Brown v. … Estate of Crosby, 55 Cal. 574 ; Estate of Godfrey, 4 Mich. 315; Woolf v. Ogden, 66 Ill. 224 ; McCrary v. Tasker, 41 Iowa, 255 .

Byrd v. Brown

613 S.W.2d 695 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1981

On March 23, 1977, the appellants and Carters filed their petition against the respondents James Brown, Charles Jacks and the City of Cabool. … It was alleged that the fire and damage were caused by the negligence of respondents James Brown and Charles Jacks while acting within the scope of their employment by the respondent City of Cabool.

Miller v. Brown

47 Mo. 504 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1871

Brown. … Brown.

Brown v. Payne

264 S.W.2d 341 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 11, 1954

Brown’s signal. Mrs. … Brown’s injuries and losses are not demonstrably comparable to, the injuries involved in Rinderknecht v. Thompson, 359 Mo. 21 , 220 S.W.2d 69 and Schaefer v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Mo.

Brown v. Stroeter

263 S.W.2d 458 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1953

Strohm v. Boden, 359 Mo. 573 , 222 S.W.2d 772, 775 . … S C.J.S., Appeal and Error, § 1487, page 133; National Cypress Pole & Piling Co. v. Hemphill Lumber Co., 325 Mo. 807, 822 , 31 S.W.2d 1059 . Judgment affirmed. All concur.

Bachman v. Brown

57 Mo. App. 68 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1894

Louis v. Laughlin, 49 Mo. 559 ; Knox City v. Thompson, 19 Mo. App. 526 . Other sections of the act tend to strengthen this view.

Brown v. State

547 S.W.3d 604 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 15, 2018

PER CURIAM Boyce Brown (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing.

Brown v. State

544 S.W.3d 687 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 2018

PER CURIAM Evrick Brown ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order" 1 denying Movant's "Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence," which alleged

Brown v. State

550 S.W.3d 149 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 2018

Per curiam: Jamuahle Brown ("Brown") appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Pettis County, Missouri, denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction *150 relief after an evidentiary hearing. … Brown argues that the motion court erred in denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion because it violated his right to effective assistance of counsel since trial counsel failed to engage in additional cross-examination of one

State v. Brown

718 S.W.2d 493 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 14, 1986

State v. Schmidt, 530 S.W.2d 424 (Mo.App.1975). … State v. Wood, 596 S.W.2d 394 (Mo.1980). Here, defendant’s character was not an essential element of the charge, claim or defense.

Weese v. Brown

102 Mo. 299 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1890

Without deciding whether or not such demand was necessary under' former rulings of this court on the subject (Cornelius v. McDonald (1828), 2 Mo. 55 ; Rollins v. … S. 1889, sec. 2302 ; Pickle v. Railroad (1873), 54 Mo. 219 .

State v. Brown

449 S.W.2d 664 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1970

Criminal Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R.; Crosswhite v. … BROWN: No, sir. * * * THE COURT: The Court will accept both of your pleas of guilty and order the State Board of Probation make a presentence investigation and set the matter down for sentencing Friday, July 7th. * * * “On

Brown v. Walker

11 Mo. App. 226 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1881

Groner v. Smith, 49 Mo. 318 ; Hardin v. McCanse, 53 Mo. 255 . … Norton v. Quimby, 45 Mo. 388 ; Waddell v. Williams, 50 Mo. 216 ; Hewitt v. Weatherby, 57 Mo. 276 ; Whitman v. Taylor, 60 Mo. 127 .

Brown v. Worthington

162 Mo. App. 508 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1912

S. 1909, the case was transferred to the Springfield Court of Appeals for determination, and that court disposed of the same, as will appear from its opinion, reported under the title of Brown v. Worthington, 152 Mo. … Board of Health (Fla.), 5 South. 1 ; Sornborger v. Sanford (Neb.), 52 N. W. 368 .]

Brown v. Hartzell

87 Mo. 564 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1885

Cochran v. Whitesides, 34 Mo. 418 ; More v. Perry, 61 Mo. 174 ; Reed v. Price, 30 Mo. 446 ; Ware v. Johnson, 55 Mo. 502 . In Watts v.