Case law

August Realty, Inc. v. Inhabitants of Town of York

431 A.2d 1289 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 2, 1981

Merrill Trust Co. v. State, Me., 417 A.2d 435, 439 (1980); Timberlands, Inc. v. Maine State Highway Comm., Me., 284 A.2d 894, 897-98 (1971). … See Merrill Trust Co. v. State, Me., 417 A.2d 435, 440 (1980); cf. Jordan v. Town of Canton, Me., 265 A.2d 96, 98 (1970) (“The right of access to a public way is a property right in the nature of an.easement.”)

Nichols v. City of Eastport

585 A.2d 827 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 6, 1991

Article V of the Ordinance specifically provides that a permit from the Board is required for a commercial structure in the SGD District of Eastport. … Pursuant to Article V, the CEO properly referred Kly-ver’s application to construct a commercial building at 1 High Street to the Board.

Woodman v. Carter

90 Me. 302 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 26, 1897

case, and if the boards were satisfactory and the needs of our business required it, perhaps the entire quantity which they would cut at their mill during said season of 1894-5; the boards were, when suitably dried, to be … Rogers v. Smith, 47 N. Y. 324 ; Davlin v. Hill, 11 Maine, 434; 1 Daniel on Neg. Inst. 81 (a). In Stone v. Dean, 5 N.

Still v. State

256 A.2d 670 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 29, 1969

Kurzynski v. Hunt, 25 F.Supp. 647 (D.C.1938); United States ex rel. Kelley v. Martin, 108 F.Supp. 672 (D.C.1952), aff’d, C.A.2d Cir., 200 F.2d 336 ; Commonwealth ex rel. Wall v. … In Greenfield v.

State v. Wagner

61 Me. 178 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1873

Foster Elam v. Neilson, 2 Pet. 254 ; State v. Dunnell, 3 R. I. 127. … The case of Evans v.

Hodgdon v. Campbell

411 A.2d 667 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 20, 1980

Co. v. Greenough, 88 N.H. 391, 392-93 , 190 A. 129, 130-31 (1937); cf. Board of Regents v. … Parker, 97 Me. 461, 466 , 54 A. 1115, 1117 (1903); see Whitmore v. Brown, 100 Me. 410, 414 , 61 A. 985, 987 (1905).

Ketchum v. Moores

122 Me. 166 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 27, 1922

Russell v. … Brown v. Webber, 103 Maine, 60. The parties, however, in their briefs urge the court to enter the domain of construing the meaning of. the disclaimer. . But such suggestion presents only a moot question.

Libby v. Boise Cascade Corp.

709 A.2d 737 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 30, 1998

In Lamson v. … See Tripp v. Philips Elmet Corp., 676 A.2d 927, 930-31 (Me.1996). We therefore cannot conclude that the statute plainly compels a contrary conclusion to that reached by the Board in this case. See Nielsen v.

Dehahn v. Innes

356 A.2d 711 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 22, 1976

Furthermore, viewing the agreement between the parties as an “entire” contract, the defendant, relying on Brown v. … Brown v. True, supra, 123 Me. at page 290 , 122 A. 850 .

Teamsters Union Local 340 v. Portland Water District

651 A.2d 339 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 19, 1994

attacking the decision of the Board or simply affirming the Board’s decision.” … No. 43 Teachers Ass’n v. M.S.A.D. No. 43 Bd. of Directors, 432 A.2d 395, 398, n. 6 (Me.1981). A recent decision of the United States Supreme Court confirms our ruling in Lane. In Litton Fin. Printing Div. v.

Munro v. Barton

95 Me. 262 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 19, 1901

Fiske, 2 Pick. 540 , and Putnam v. Putnam, 13 Pick. 129 , a construction which has been uniformly followed by this court ever since the enactment of the statute in this State. Roby v. Skinner, 34 Maine, 270; Brown v. … Brown v. Snell, supra. Whitehouse Eq. Practice, § 71. The bill in this case was filed March, 1894.

Pendexter v. Tilcon of Maine, Inc.

1999 Me. 34 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 17, 1999

See e.g., Cesare v. Great N. Paper Co., Inc., 1997 ME 170, ¶ 5 , 697 A.2d 1325, 1327 ; Bowie, 661 A.2d at 1131 ; see also Miles v. Russell Memorial Hosp., 202 Mich. App. 6 , 507 N.W.2d 784, 785 (1993); Dezwaan v. … App. 575 , 473 N.W.2d 788, 790 (1991); Frasier v. Model Coverall Serv. Inc., 182 Mich.

Sanford Properties, Inc. v. Town of Sanford

609 A.2d 287 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 28, 1992

We review directly the zoning board’s action and the burden of persuasion falls upon the party seeking to overturn the zoning board’s decision. See Waltman v. Town of Yarmouth, 592 A.2d 1079, 1080 (Me.1991), and Mack v. … See LaPointe v. City of Saco, 419 A.2d 1013, 1015 (Me. 1980). Therefore, the owner argues, because mobile home parks are not an expressly prohibited use, they must be a permitted use. See Your Home, Inc. v.

Baker v. Town of Woolwich

517 A.2d 64 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 27, 1987

Dongo v. … Bradley v. Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974).

Greenleaf v. Hamilton

94 Me. 118 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 10, 1900

Atwood v. Lucas, 58 Maine, 508 ; Edmunds v. Wiggin, 24 Maine, 505; Moody v. Brown, 34 Maine, 107; Greenleaf v. Gallagher, 93 Maine, 549. … As stated in Moody v. Brown, supra, “ there must be proof of an acceptance or of acts or words respecting it from which an acceptance may be inferred.”

School Committee of Winslow v. Inhabitants of Winslow

404 A.2d 988 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 9, 1979

Town of West Hartford, 25 Conn.Sup. 302 , 203 A.2d 152, 154 (1964); Murphy v. Berlin Board of Education, 167 Conn. 368 , 355 A.2d 265 (1974); Board of Education of Louisville v. … E. g., Board of Trustees of Calaveras Unified School Dist. v. Leach, 258 Cal.App.2d 281 , 65 Cal.Rptr. 588 (1968); State ex rel. Wasilewski v. Board of School Directors, 14 Wis.2d 243 , 111 N.W.2d 198 (1961); Tanner v.

Lamonica v. Holmes

1998 Me. 190 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 28, 1998

See Kennedy v. … See, e.g., LaPointe v.

Bergeron v. Henderson

185 F.R.D. 10 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 30, 1999

See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(a); Brown v. General Services Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 825 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1964 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … The Court finds that the decision in Brown, 425 U.S. at 822 , 96 S.Ct. at 1962 , supports Title VII preemption of a claim under state law against a federal employer, see Callanan v.

Lane Construction Corp. v. Town of Washington

916 A.2d 973 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 20, 2007

See DeMello v. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot, 611 A.2d 985, 986-87 (Me.1992). … See Bernier v. Data Gen.

Schmidt v. Town of Northfield

534 A.2d 1314 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 24, 1987

Citing Town of Arundel v. … Count I further alleged that there existed no governmental body in Northfield to which an appeal from the Planning Board’s action could be taken. This assertion was later stipulated to by both parties. See Bruk v.