Case law

Hessey v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

601 A.2d 3 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1991

Keefe v. St. … See United States v. Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 27 , 68 S.Ct. 376, 381 , 92 L.Ed. 442 (1948); Cabell v.

Scolaro v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

691 A.2d 77 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1997

V. … See Dunn v.

Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Delta Air Lines, Inc

863 F.2d 87 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 1988

The leading case is Bonin v. … ALPA v.

Gorgone v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

973 A.2d 692 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 2009

See Kuri Bros. v. … The decision of the Board of Zoning Adjustment is Affirmed. 1 .

Armstrong v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board

194 F.2d 875 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 17, 1952

Armstrong v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, 1950, 15 T.C. 625 . 4 . U. S. Electrical Motors v. Jones, 1946, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 329 , 153 F.2d 134 ; Ring Const. Corporation v. … War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, 1951, 89 U.S.App.D.C. -, 192 F.2d 405 .

Gollin v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

359 A.2d 590 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1976

Urging that petitioners have not exhausted their administrative remedies, the Board relies upon our recent opinion in Foley v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, D.C.App., 358 A.2d 305 (1976). … See Kamins v. Board of Elections for District of Columbia, D.C.App., 324 A.2d 187 (1974); Curtis v. Bindeman, D.C.App., 261 A.2d 515 (1970).

Downtown Cluster of Congregations v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

675 A.2d 484 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1996

A decision of the Board will not be set aside unless it is clearly erroneous or inconsistent with the zoning regulations. Silverstone v. … The Board concluded, however, relying on Clerics of Saint Viator, Inc. v.

Richard Pickus v. United States Board of Parole

507 F.2d 1107 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 10, 1974

The Board also argues that Gagnon v. … Lewis-Mota v. Secretary of Labor, 2d Cir. 1972, 469 F.2d 478, 482 ; Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, 3d Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 740, 744 ; National Motor Freight Traffic Ass’n v.

Reins v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

572 A.2d 122 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1990

Park Citizens Ass’n v. … Park Community Ass’n v.

Carr v. Corning, Superintendent of Public Schools Browne Junior High School Parent-Teacher Ass'n v. Magdeburger

182 F.2d 14 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1950

We do not read Parker v. Brown, 30 the dissent in Burns Baking Co. v. Bryan, 31 or the concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Frankfurter in McCollum v. … Board of Education, 1903, 66 Kan. 672 , 72 P. 274 ; Pearson v. Murray, 1936, 169 Md. 478 , 182 A. 590 , 103 A.L.R. 708 ; Graham v. Board of Education of City of Topeka, 1941, 153 Kan. 840 , 114 P.2d 313 ; Martin v.

Harold Brown, Secretary of the Air Force v. Leonard Gamage

377 F.2d 154 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 23, 1967

The Regulations appear to have been followed explicitly by the Board of Inquiry. Cf. Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535 , 79 S.Ct. 968 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1959); Service v. … In the second Williams case (Williams, v.

Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

545 F.2d 194 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 1976

Burson, 402 U.S. 535 , 91 S.Ct. 1586 , 29 L.Ed.2d 90 (1971); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); and Perry v. … This concept of property was further refined in Board of Regents v.

Hadigian v. Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System

463 F. Supp. 437 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 6, 1978

Hampton, supra, 184 U.S.App.D.C. at 378 , 566 F.2d at 271 ; Wood v. U. S. … Schlegel v. United States, 416 F.2d 1372, 1376 , 189 Ct.Cl. 30 (1969), quoting Burkett v. United States, 402 F.2d 1002, 1004 , 185 Ct.Cl. 631 (1968).

Johnnie Curry v. Edgar J. Brown, Mauris W. Platkin, M.D

440 F.2d 259 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 10, 1971

Brown, Finance Officer of Saint Elizabeths, and Dr. Mauris M. Platkin, the Acting Director of John Howard. … Hudson v. Hardy, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 44, 47 , 412 F.2d 1091, 1094 (1968).

Elizabeth Brown v. National Permanent Federal Savings and Loan Association

683 F.2d 444 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1982

Brown sought rescission, statutory damages, costs and attorneys’ fees and was granted summary judgment by the District Court. Brown v. National Permanent Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n, 526 F.Supp. 815 (D.D.C.1981). … In Etta v.

Jones v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board

455 A.2d 896 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1983

I The Board’s decision must be affirmed on appeal if it is supported by substantial evidence. Pillis v. District of Colombia Hackers’ License Appeal Board, D.C.App., 366 A.2d 1094, 1095 (1976); Proctor v. … Liberty v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 410 A.2d 191, 192 (1979). Here, there is no such evidence.

Benjamin Rose Institute v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

355 A.2d 569 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1976

Benjamin Rose Institute v. District Unemp. Comp. Bd., D.C.App., 338 A.2d 104 (1975). 2 . … Any claimant, his most recent employer and any of his base period employers may appeal to the Board from the determination of any agent of the Board with respect to the payments of benefits to such claimant provided the appeal

NBCUniversal Media, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

815 F.3d 821 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 2016

See, e.g., Fox v. Clinton, 684 F.3d 67, 80 (D.C. Cir. 2012). … See Point Park Univ. v. NLRB, 457 F.3d 42, 49-50 (D.C. Cir. 2006). When we cannot discern that rationale, we are in no better a position than when the Board is silent.

Mohmand v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2018

at 7 (Compl. ¶ 19), and Jeffrey Shell, the Chairman of the Board, Dkt. 1 at 1. … See Burlington N. & Santa Fe Railway Co. v.

Eastern Canvas Products, Inc. v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense. Eastern Canvas Products, Inc. v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense

580 F.2d 675 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1978

See, Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199 , 94 S.Ct. 1055 , 39 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974); Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535 , 79 S.Ct. 968 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1959). … Williamson v. Lee Optical Co., 1955, 348 U.S. 483, 489 , 75 S.Ct. 461, 465 , 99 L.Ed. 563 . See Katzenbach v. Morgan, 1966, 384 U.S. 641 , 86 S.Ct. 1717 , 16 L.Ed.2d 828 ; Roschen v.