Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

6.38s

  • Southwest Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

    441 F.2d 1027 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 1970

    FAHY, Senior Circuit Judge: In No. 22,259, Levi Strauss & Co. v. … The Board found that maintenance of this rule, operative even during nonworking time, constituted a violation of *1031 Section 8(a)(1). We sustain the Board. Republic Aviation Corp. v.

    Criticized by United States v. Culoso, 461 F. Supp. 128 (1978)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Morgan v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    305 A.2d 243 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1973

    after remand from the B.A.R. for findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Wingo v. … Such procedure was approved of and recommended in Brewington v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 532 (1972).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Capello v. District of Columbia Board of Education

    669 F. Supp. 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 1987

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1971). … The Board’s case authority does not support the proposition that the legislation constitutes a “taking.” Its chief authorities, Daylo v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • DHL Express, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    813 F.3d 365 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 21, 2016

    Before: ROGERS, BROWN and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. BROWN, Circuit Judge: DHL Express, Inc. … Patio Foods v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Hickman v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2010

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Oralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues the Federal Reserve.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Givens v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

    720 F.2d 196 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 1983

    In Gebbie v. … In Frock v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Goodman v. Chairman, State Board of Pardons & Paroles

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 25, 2010

    Plaintiff, 1 ) Civil Action No. 1 ) Chairman, State Board … He sues various Georgia-based officials, including the Chairman of the State Board of Pardons and Paroles, the Clerk of the Georgia Supreme Court, the Chief Judge of the Superior Court of Ware County, Georgia, the Ware

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Von Stauffenberg v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    459 F.2d 1128 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 1972

    Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 611 , 80 S.Ct. 1367 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1438 (1960); Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Com’rs, 330 U.S. 552 , 67 S.Ct. 910 , 91 L.Ed. 1093 (1947); Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. … Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 603 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961) (religion); Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214, 216 , 65 S.Ct. 193 , 89 L.Ed. 194 (1944) (national origin). .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Warshawsky & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    182 F.3d 948 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1999

    DeBartolo Corp. v. … Crawford-El v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Perkins v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    813 A.2d 206 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2002

    United States v. Pritchett, 470 F.2d 455, 459 (D.C.Cir.1972); see also District of Columbia v. Smith, 329 A.2d 128, 130 (D.C.1974). … District of Columbia v. Smith, 329 A.2d 128, 130 (D.C.1974). .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Rovillard v. United States Capitol Police Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2010

    Corp. v. … The Police Board is correct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global Ministries

    284 F. Supp. 2d 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2003

    Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … Reply at 13 (citing Johnson v. Maddox, 230 F.Supp.2d 1, 9 (D.D.C.2002) (Urbina, J.) (citing Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 )).

    Cited 396 timesPublished
  • Strohmeyer v. Surface Transportation Board

    550 F. App'x 8 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 30, 2013

    Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass’n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301, 321-22 (D.C.Cir.1985) (per curiam). … Commerce Comm’n v. ICC, 817 F.2d 145 (D.C.Cir.1987). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roumel v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    417 A.2d 405 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1980

    See Palmer v. Board *408 of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535 (1972). … Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 398 A.2d 13, 15 (1979).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Fallbrook Hospital Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    785 F.3d 729 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 2015

    Co. v. Schnabel Found., 946 F.2d 930, 937 n.5 (D.C. … Teamsters Local 115 v. NLRB, 640 F.2d 392, 399 (D.C. Cir. 1981); see also Fibreboard Paper Prods. Corp. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • International Association Of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio, District Lodge 64, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board

    130 F.3d 1083 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 1997

    v. … The Board ruled that in order to show fraudulent concealment, IAM had to show an affirmative act of concealment. See Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co., 321 N.L.R.B. at 924 (citing Richards v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ricks v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 27, 2021

    She has filed suit against the United States Railroad Retirement Board (“RRB”), including the RRB Hearings & Appeals Office, and the “whole railroad retirement board systemically.” See id. at 2. … Rockefeller v. Westinghouse Elec. Co., 274 F. Supp. 2d 10, 16 (D.D.C. 2003) (same), affd sub nom. Rockefeller ex rel. U.S. v. Washington TRU Solutions LLC, No. 03-7120, 2004 WL 180264 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 21, 2004).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Salem Hospital Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    808 F.3d 59 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 2015

    Withrow v. … See Alois Box Co. v. NLRB, 216 F.3d 69, 78 (D.C.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Walsh v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    826 A.2d 375 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2003

    See Felicity’s, Inc. v. … The Board’s reading of the pertinent regulation was flawed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hessey v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

    601 A.2d 3 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1991

    Keefe v. St. … See United States v. Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 27 , 68 S.Ct. 376, 381 , 92 L.Ed. 442 (1948); Cabell v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.