Case law

Taylor v. State

889 P.2d 319 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1995

Clearly, the DNA match evidence was pertinent to this inquiry and thus sufficiently relevant to have warranted admission. … These numbers clearly helped the jury appreciate the significance of the DNA match evidence.

Moore v. State

736 P.2d 161 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1987

She offered incriminating evidence against appellant after having been granted immunity. … Appellant fails to establish any of the elements listed above.

Fry v. State

78 Okla. Crim. 299 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1944

It has been the established practice in this court in the early cases for the question of whether a confession is voluntary or involuntary to be submitted to the jury. The cases heretofore cited fully state this rule. … The facts in the instant case clearly demonstrate this.’ *317 “As there stated, it is not always necessary to secure a confession in order to secure a conviction.

City of Coweta v. Doughten

264 P.3d 135 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 22, 2011

Consequently, City is not required to establish a board of review. … City has qualified for this exception, through the CBA.

Opinion No. 68-273 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 1968

It was the contention of the petitioners that, under the terms of the pertinent statute, such courts could only be established in cities of population of more than 25,000 and less than 100,000 and that clearly Oklahoma City … The defendant thereafter duly qualified for the office and entered upon the performance of his duties.

Board of Education of Dependent School District No. 23 Osage County v. Allen

615 P.2d 1009 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 7, 1980

There is no established procedure for making the statutorily-contemplated determination of eligibility. … Although § 2-102 does not expressly deal with the qualifications for signing a school-related petition, we view the statute as clearly intended to govern, with equal force, the qualifications for signing § 8-106 petitions

Cornell v. McAlister

121 Okla. 285 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1926

For reversal, the plaintiff in error contends that the defendant John Rogers is not qualified to hold the office of State Examiner and Inspector because he does not hold a certified public accountant certificate, and that … consider the title of said act in connection with the provisions of section 57, article 5, of the Constitution of Oklahoma, which provides that every act of the Legislature shall embrace but one subject, which shall be clearly

Loftin v. Yancey

182 Okla. 313 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1937

We will weigh the evidence, but we will not reverse the judgment of the trial court unless it lappears clearly to be against the weight of the evidence. Porter v. … We doubt whether the proponents actually established testamentary capacity. The attending physician refused to qualify as an expert on mental cases. His testimony w!as weak.

Hudgins v. Foster

131 Okla. 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1928

Clearly, both theories cannot be .correct, though it must be admitted that each have some apparent support in the decided cases. … In our judgment the act here under consideration clearly falls within the constitutional inhibition as herein before pointed out.

Eaves v. State

61 O.B.A.J. 1792 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1990

(Emphasis added) This section clearly states that the tribal housing authority is a state agency. In Housing Authority of the Choctaw Nation v. … The statute was created pursuant to the federal HUD guidelines which sets forth in detail the procedures to qualify the housing authority for HUD funding.

Lloyd v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission

72 O.B.A.J. 1219 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 2001

The Chickasaw Nation Court acknowledged Indian tribes and their members were generally immune from state taxation, but, citing Sac and Fox Nation, supra, found this rule did not apply outside Indian Country. … Basing a decision on that contention would require gross speculation. 1 13 OTC's determination is founded in the rule clearly set forth in Chickasaw Nation, and Lloyds effectively stipulate to facts which support applying

City of Woodward v. Raynor

29 Okla. 493 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1911

of $30,000, and will levy a tax on all the property in the city of Woodward and on the property of this plaintiff, among others, to establish a sinking fund to pay the principal at maturity,” all of which he says will be … In passing we said: “To entitle defendant to a temporary injunction, it was necessary for her to show clearly and by proper averment in her cross-petition that plaintiff had done, or was threatening to do, some act which

State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. Freeman

440 P.2d 744 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1968

Every State Officer specifically mentioned in Article VI, § 1, supra, is elected by the qualified voters of the entire State. … This is because it clearly does not fall within the class of records required by law to be kept or filed in a public office.

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 1985

Clearly, therefore, the first two prohibitions are inapplicable. … Title 68 O.S. 102 — 68 O.S. 112 (1981), as amended, establish the Oklahoma Tax Commission.

Davis v. Moore

387 P.2d 483 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1963

The instrument was drawn upon the customary printed form, and was prepared in the grantor’s, plaintiff’s presence by a qualified attorney. … This being an action of equitable cognizance, the finding of the lower court should be sustained unless it appears that its finding is clearly against the weight of the evidence. Atteberry et al. v.

Yeager v. Farmer

549 P.2d 345 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1976

The preliminary ruling of the trial court following the hearing clearly established the fact that Maxey’s testimony about the test results would not be admitted during any part of the trial for any reason. … A separate ramification of this absent testimony is that 47 O.S.1971, § 762 designates and limits those persons qualified to obtain blood samples taken under authority of the implied consent law. See, Raley v.

Gentges v. Oklahoma State Election Board

319 P.3d 674 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 2014

The State Election Board's summary judgment eviden-tiary material established that Ms. Gentges possesses a valid photo Oklahoma drivers license. … The important qualifying language in question is "before it becomes a law."

Harmon v. Cradduck

286 P.3d 643 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 2012

The trial court disposed of Harmon's § 1983 claims on several grounds, including immunity under the United States Constitution. … Yet, Harmon's amended petition clearly designated the defendants "in their individual capacity to impose personal liability." Amended Petition, at p. 1.

Marsh v. Terra International (Oklahoma), Inc.

122 F. Supp. 3d 1267 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jul 9, 2015

Martineau’s records establish that Marsh has two relevant physical impairments — the back and knee injuries. … Clearly, Marsh could perform the essential functions of the job as it existed prior to the increased production requirements.

Tibbets & Pleasant, Inc. v. Cook

143 Okla. 101 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1930

It is; defendants’ second contention that “plaintiff’s witnesses were not shown to be qualified to testify as to the value of the animals in controversy as race horses,” etc. … We have read carefully the entire record in this case, and have considered the briefs of defendants, and we are clearly of the opinion that no substantial error has been pointed out in the trial of this case.