Case law

Brown v. Brown

49 Mass. 573 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1844

One of the strongest of these, perhaps, among the recent cases, is the case of Smith v.

Brown v. Brown

926 S.W.2d 103 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 21, 1996

Belt v. Rutledge

175 W. Va. 28 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1985

The circuit court’s authority to review a decision of the Board of Review was stated in Syllabus point 1 of Kisamore v. … See also Copen v. Hix, 130 W.Va. 343 , 43 S.E.2d 382 (1947). This standard is not applicable to the Board of Review.

Brown v. Brown

34 Va. Cir. 34 · Richmond County Circuit Court · May 3, 1994

Brown v. Brown

335 N.C. 766 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1994

Brown v. Brown

360 S.C. 7 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Jun 21, 2004

.: Woodrow Brown brought this action against Joseph Wilson Brown and the Town of Harleyville alleging negligence by a *9 police officer resulting in injury to Woodrow. … See Trousdell v. Cannon, 351 S.C. 636, 641 , 572 S.E.2d 264, 266-267 (2002); Arthurs v.

Brown v. Brown

341 N.C. 418 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 7, 1995

Brown v. Brown

684 So. 2d 939 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 6, 1996

In re Brown, Philip B.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of East Carroll, 6th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 16,417; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 28441-CA.

Brown v. Brown

263 A.D.2d 455 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 6, 1999

of discretion for the trial court, which is in the best position to determine whether a mistrial is required under the circumstances of the case, and its decision must be accorded great deference (see, Matter of Plummer v … Accordingly, there is no bar to a retrial (see, Matter of Plummer v Rothwax, supra; Matter of Martin v Hynes, 259 AD2d 547 ; Matter of Spivack v Brown, 259 AD2d 488 ).

Brown v. Brown

19 N.J. Super. 431 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 1952

BROWN, PLAINTIFF, v. EDWARD I. BROWN, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division. Decided May 13, 1952. Messrs. Goldstein & Novogrod, attorneys for plaintiff. Messrs. … Estin v. Estin, 334 U.S. 541 , 68 S.Ct. 1213 , 92 L.Ed. 1561 , 1 A.L.R. 1413 (1948); Kreiger v. Kreiger, 334 U.S. 555 , 68 S.Ct. 1221 , 92 L.Ed. 1572 (1948).

Sisemore v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.

662 F. Supp. 1529 · District Court, D. Alaska · Jun 25, 1987

Gay v. … Anderson v.

Brown v. Brown

335 N.C. 766 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1994

Brown v. Brown

191 A.D.2d 301 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 18, 1993

Brown v. Brown

68 Ohio St. 3d 1441 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1994

Brown v. Brown

96 Nev. 713 · Nevada Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1980

On July 18, 1958, Ronald Brown, defendant-appellant, and Leona Brown, plaintiff-respondent, were divorced in the State of Idaho. … See Brown v. Brown, 165 P.2d 886 (Idaho 1946). See also Burke v. Burke, 255 P.2d 740 (Colo. 1953). We do not so read the cases cited.

Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Johnson

115 A.D.3d 162 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 7, 2014

Plaintiff Brown & Brown, Inc. (BBI) is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Florida, and it is the parent corporation of plaintiff Brown & Brown of New York, Inc. (BBNY). … , 484-485 [2012]; Brown & Brown, Inc. v Mudron, 379 Ill App 3d 724, 727-728, 887 NE2d 437, 440 [2008]; Unisource Worldwide, Inc. v South Cent.

Brown v. Brown

635 So. 2d 893 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1994

Brown v. Brown

913 S.W.2d 387 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 1996

United States v. Jovanovic

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2025

See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … See also Thorp v. District of Columbia, 142 F. Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v.

Brown v. Brown

72 Ohio St. 3d 1524 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 1995