Case law

Carter v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

223 Or. App. 745 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 2008

Because we conclude that the board’s order is supported by substantial evidence and that the board is not required to state the reasons for its decision, we affirm. … See Weidner v. Armenakis, 154 Or App 12, 19-20 , 959 P2d 623 , vac’d and rent’d, 327 Or 317 (1998), dismissed by order, July 13, 1998, reasoning readopted and reaffirmed in Merrill v.

Norris v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

350 Or. 130 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 2011

250 P.3d 922 (2011) 350 Or. 130 NORRIS v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S059042). Supreme Court of Oregon. March 25, 2011. Petition for review denied.

McIntyre v. Kamm

12 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 4, 1885

(Ja ckson v. Livingston, 6 Johns. 149; Jackson v. Osborn, *259 2 Wend. 555 ; Bradstreet v. Clarke, 12 Wend. 673 ; Norman v. Wells, 17 Wend. 137 ; Van Cortlandt v. Tozer, 17 Wend. 338 ; Carver v. Jackson, 4 Peters, 82 .) … As this was not done, it was error to admit the deed on the Woods’ certificate alone, and direct a verdict for the defendants as to said lot. *260 The description in the deed from Sarah Brown to William Stevens was sufficient

Central School District 13J v. State Board of Education

91 Or. App. 308 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 1988

Jackson v. Dept. of Rev., 298 Or 633 , 695 P2d 923 (1985); Central School (Beaman I) v. Marion District, supra. … The Fuller remonstrance was premature because it preceded the final order of the Polk County District Boundary Board. As we noted in Central School (Beaman I) v.

Makinson v. Board of Directors, School District No. 4

209 Or. 232 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1956

Seufert v. Stadelman, 178 Or 646 , 167 P2d 936 ; United States of America v. Cohn, 201 Or 680 , 272 P2d 982 ; State ex rel. Bethke v. Bain, 193 Or 688 , 240 P2d 958 . … Funston v. District School Board, etc., 130 Or 82 , 278 P 1075 .

Center for Tribal Water Advocacy v. Board of Commissioners

222 Or. App. 212 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 3, 2008

Sanchez v. SAIF Corp.

242 Or. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 2011

Citing Schuening v. J. R. … As noted, in affirming the ALJ, the board relied in part on its order in Brown.

Murphy v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

351 Or. 545 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 2, 2012

274 P.3d 184 (2012) 351 Or. 545 MURPHY v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. (S059788). Supreme Court of Oregon. February 2, 2012. Petition for Review Denied.

Lis v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

34 Or. App. 215 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 8, 1978

At that time, Rule L-3-F of the Administrative Code of the defendant Board of Higher Education (Board), the predecessor to the Board’s Administrative Rules which were adopted in 1970, 1 provided with respect to tenure: "If … There is a presumption that the official duty of the members of the Board in adopting its rules was regularly performed. ORS 41.360(15); 3 see also Sch. Dist. No. 1 v.

Walton v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

349 Or. 654 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 2011

249 P.3d 542 (2011) 349 Or. 654 WALTON v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S059006). Supreme Court of Oregon. February 17, 2011. Petition for Review Allowed.

Severy v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

224 Or. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 2008

App. 176 Donald SEVERY, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. A132525. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted October 30, 2008. Decided November 26, 2008. … Norris v. Board of Parole, 331 Or. 194 , 13 P.3d 104 (2000), cert. den., 534 U.S. 1028 , 122 S.Ct. 562 , 151 L.Ed.2d 437 (2001); Wilson v. Board of Parole, 222 Or. App. 224 , 193 P.3d 32 (2008).

Sisters of Charity v. Washington County Board of Commissioners

3 Or. Tax 106 · Oregon Tax Court · Aug 10, 1967

These cases are before the court on two Alternative Writs of Mandamus requiring the Board of Commissioners of Washington County to consider the petitioner’s claim for real property tax refunds for 1965-66 and 1966-67. … The county board" of equalization and the county court are without jurisdiction to grant or deny claims for exemption as charitable organizations. University v. Multnomah County, 31 Or 498 , 50 P 532 (1897).

Baker v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

351 Or. 401 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 1, 2011

268 P.3d 152 (2011) 351 Or. 401 BAKER v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. (S059750). Supreme Court of Oregon. December 1, 2011. Petition for review denied.

Penk v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

99 F.R.D. 506 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 28, 1982

See O’Connor v. Chrysler Corporation, 86 F.R.D. 211 (D.Mass.1980). Those portions of defendant’s affirmative action reports which are not self-evaluative or subject to another claim of privilege are discoverable.

Powell v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

235 Or. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 2, 2010

App. 339 POWELL v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. A138685. Court of Appeals of Oregon. May 2, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.

Damascus Community Church v. Clackamas County Board of Commissioners

32 Or. App. 3 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 16, 1978

In Bienz *9 v. … We stated in Saxon v.

Wes Linn Land Co. v. Board of County Commissioneers

36 Or. App. 39 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 6, 1978

We agree with petitioners that the Board’s findings are inadequate. The Board’s action on a subdivision application is quasi-judicial in nature, Bienz v. … This case must be remanded to the Board for an order consistent with this opinion. Reversed and remanded. 1 The rule of Marracci v. City of Scappoose, 26 Or App 131 , 552 P2d 552 , rev den (1976), and Dickinson v.

Halladay v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

351 Or. 403 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2011

271 P.3d 115 (2011) HALLADAY v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. (S059800). Supreme Court of Oregon. December 15, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.

Meriweather v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

351 Or. 318 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 10, 2011

267 P.3d 158 (2011) 351 Or. 318 MERIWEATHER v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. (S059734). Supreme Court of Oregon. November 10, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.

Damman v. Board of Com'rs of Yamhill County

351 Or. 545 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 2, 2012

274 P.3d 184 (2012) 351 Or. 545 DAMMAN v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF YAMHILL COUNTY. No. (S059352). Supreme Court of Oregon. February 2, 2012. Petition for Review Allowed. Respondent's petition for review is allowed. … The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of Commissioners, 351 Or. 219 , 264 P.3d 1265 (2011).