Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

5.49s

  • Scott v. Oklahoma State Board of Education

    618 P.2d 410 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1980

    Until the third year is completed, limited by the statutory requirement that notice of non-renewal be given by April ( 70 O.S. 1971 , § 6-101), the public employer represented by the board of education may decide whether … Cavett v. Geary Board of Education, Okl., 587 P.2d 991 (1978), not squarely in point since the argument there was that the Board had resolved to issue a fourth year’s contract but changed its mind before April 10th.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams Natural Gas Co. v. . State Board of Equalization

    65 O.B.A.J. 4201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1994

    See also State v. Colonial Pipeline Co., 471 So.2d 408 (Ala. Civ. App.1984); Federal Express Corp. v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization, 717 S.W.2d 873 (Tenn.1986). … See Arizona v. Atchison T. & S.F.R., 656 F.2d 398 (9th Cir.1981); Louisville & N.R. v. Louisiana Tax Comm’n, 498 F.Supp. 418, 421 (D.La.1980); Tennessee v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners of Caddo County v. Dietrich

    49 Okla. 267 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

    Weisbender v. School District, 24 Okla. 173 , 103 Pac. 639 , and Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pottawatomie County, Excise Board v. Standish Pipe Line Co.

    189 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1941

    The excise board takes the contrary view. In Oklahoma County Excise Board v. J. M. … Jewett et al. v. School Dist. No. 25 in Fremont Co., 49 Wyo. 277 , 54 P. 2d 546; Midland Special School Dist. of Sebastian County, Ark., v. Central Trust Co. of Illinois, 1 F. 2d 124 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. Melton

    428 P.2d 205 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1967

    The reasoning, and the conclusion urged, acknowledge our prior decisions in Thrasher v. Board of Governors, etc., Okl., 359 P.2d 717 , and Rushing v. Board of Governors, etc., (Cons.) Okl., 391 P.2d 796 . … Thrasher v. Board of Governors, supra. In such cases injunction is a proper remedy. Curtis v. Registered Dentists, 193 Okl. 233 , 143 P.2d 427 ; Board of Governors, etc. v. Crouch, supra.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Patrick v. State ex rel. State Board of Education

    64 O.B.A.J. 42 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1992

    Stempel v. Department of Water Resources, 508 P.2d at 169 . … State v. State Board of Examiners, 74 Mont. 1 , 238 P. 316, 320 (1925). A certificate of indebtedness is an obligation “having practically the same force and effect as a bond”. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. (1991).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Parker v. Harding

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 14, 2024

    See Garrett v. … (alteration omitted) (quoting Brown v. Barrow, 512 F.3d 1304, 1307 (11th Cir. 2008))). c.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. Cryan

    638 P.2d 437 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1981

    Seay v. Howell, 311 P.2d 207 (Okl.1957), overruling McKee v. DeGraffenreid, 33 Okl. 136 , 124 P. 303 , (1912). … Those citations are: Davis v. Murphy, 199 Okl. 545 , 188 P.2d 229 (1947); Fagin v. Thoroughman, 190 Okl. 649 , 126 P.2d 982 (1942); Cannon v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Red Dog Saloon v. Board of Adjustment

    791 P.2d 112 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1989

    MEMORANDUM OPINION HANSEN, Presiding Judge: This case arises from an application for a zoning variance to the Oklahoma City Board of Adjustment (Board) (Defendant/Appellant). … Vinson v. Medley, 737 P.2d 932 (Okla.1987). A proceeding to review a board’s decision either to grant or deny a variance is equitable in nature. Banks v. City of Bethany, 541 P.2d 178 (Okla.1975).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ingram v. Board of Com'rs of Pottawatomie County

    144 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1930

    Black v. Geissler, 58 Okla. 335 , 159 Pac. 1124 ; Fast v. Rogers, Co. Treas., 30 Okla. 289 , 119 Pac. 241 ; Racy v. Racy, 12 Okla. 650 , 73 Pac. 305 . Section 5834, C. O. … This court, in Board of Com’rs of Okmulgee County v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Board of County Com'rs of Garvin County

    66 Okla. 75 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 28, 1917

    In the Board of County Commissioners of Washita County v. … Board of County Commissioners, 44 Okla. 164 , 143 Pac. 1145 ; Zeigler v. Board of County Commissioners, 44 Okla. *78 266, 144 Pac. 381 ; Morrow v. Board of Commissioners, 31 Okla. 636 , 122 Pac. 168 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma State Board of Equalization v. Craig

    749 P.2d 1132 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1988

    See Hale v. Bd. of Cty. Com’rs. of Seminole Cty., 12 Isbell v. State, Etc. 13 and Poafpybitty v. … Department of Human Services v. Malibie, Okl., 630 P.2d 310, 312-314 [1981; State ex rel. Blankenship v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma County

    201 Okla. 652 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 22, 1949

    In Board of County Commissioners of Osage County et al. v. … Under the rules stated, the Board of County Commissioner of Osage County v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board of Equalization v. Indian Terr. Illuminating Oil Co.

    159 Okla. 15 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 17, 1932

    After a hearing before that board it was ordered that the property be placed upon the ¡tax rolls for the year 1929. The defendant appealed to the district court. … In Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, 269 U. S. 614 , 70 L.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Board of County Com'rs of Okmulgee County

    48 Okla. 737 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1915

    Coggeshall v. Connor, 31 Okla. 113 , 120 Pac. 559 , 39 L. R. A. (N. S.) 81, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 577; Board of County Commissioners of Washita County v. Brett, 32 Okla. 853 , 124 Pac. 57 ; State v. … Hooker, 26 Okla. 467 , 109 Pac. 527 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Twyford [ 39 Okla. 230 ], 134 Pac. 968 .” Zeigler v. Board of Com’rs of Grant County, 44 Okla. 266 , 144 Pac. 381 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma County v. Seymour

    45 Okla. 533 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1915

    As was said in the case of Gilfeather v. Grout, 101 App. Div. 154 , 91 N. Y. … In the present proceeding counsel for the warrant holder concedes the soundness of the opinion rendered in Seymour v. Oklahoma City, 38 Okla. 547 , 134 Pac. 45 , 47 L. R. A. (N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Delaware County v. Board of Com'rs of Delaware County

    56 Okla. 81 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 29, 1916

    On October 8, 1918, the board of county commissioners passed the following resolution: “Be it resolved by the board of county commissioners, of Delaware county, Okla.: “That said board finds the following banks situated in … Co. v. State, 43 Okla. 368 , 143 Pac. 37 . By the Court: It is so ordered.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. State Board of Agriculture v. Warren

    331 P.2d 405 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1958

    McCain v. State Election Board, 144 Okl. 85 , 289 P. 759 ; Elliott v. State ex rel. Kirkpatrick, 150 Okl. 275 , 1 P.2d 370 . … Bell v. United Farm Agency, Old., 296 P.2d 149 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Cosden v. Board of Education of City of Tulsa

    60 Okla. 214 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1916

    thereto to find, if we can, any grant of power conferred upon the board by either the Constitution or the Legislature, or if there is any limitation upon the right of the board of education to deal with its property of this … the general right of conveying the property as the judgment of the board might dictate.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of County Com'rs v. Eastern Oklahoma Pub. Co.

    120 Okla. 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1926

    And in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Kay County v. … In Allen et al. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.