Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.49s
Scott v. Oklahoma State Board of Education
618 P.2d 410 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1980
Until the third year is completed, limited by the statutory requirement that notice of non-renewal be given by April ( 70 O.S. 1971 , § 6-101), the public employer represented by the board of education may decide whether … Cavett v. Geary Board of Education, Okl., 587 P.2d 991 (1978), not squarely in point since the argument there was that the Board had resolved to issue a fourth year’s contract but changed its mind before April 10th.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilliams Natural Gas Co. v. . State Board of Equalization
65 O.B.A.J. 4201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1994
See also State v. Colonial Pipeline Co., 471 So.2d 408 (Ala. Civ. App.1984); Federal Express Corp. v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization, 717 S.W.2d 873 (Tenn.1986). … See Arizona v. Atchison T. & S.F.R., 656 F.2d 398 (9th Cir.1981); Louisville & N.R. v. Louisiana Tax Comm’n, 498 F.Supp. 418, 421 (D.La.1980); Tennessee v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBoard of Commissioners of Caddo County v. Dietrich
49 Okla. 267 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915
Weisbender v. School District, 24 Okla. 173 , 103 Pac. 639 , and Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPottawatomie County, Excise Board v. Standish Pipe Line Co.
189 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1941
The excise board takes the contrary view. In Oklahoma County Excise Board v. J. M. … Jewett et al. v. School Dist. No. 25 in Fremont Co., 49 Wyo. 277 , 54 P. 2d 546; Midland Special School Dist. of Sebastian County, Ark., v. Central Trust Co. of Illinois, 1 F. 2d 124 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedBoard of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. Melton
428 P.2d 205 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1967
The reasoning, and the conclusion urged, acknowledge our prior decisions in Thrasher v. Board of Governors, etc., Okl., 359 P.2d 717 , and Rushing v. Board of Governors, etc., (Cons.) Okl., 391 P.2d 796 . … Thrasher v. Board of Governors, supra. In such cases injunction is a proper remedy. Curtis v. Registered Dentists, 193 Okl. 233 , 143 P.2d 427 ; Board of Governors, etc. v. Crouch, supra.
Cited 6 timesPublishedPatrick v. State ex rel. State Board of Education
64 O.B.A.J. 42 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1992
Stempel v. Department of Water Resources, 508 P.2d at 169 . … State v. State Board of Examiners, 74 Mont. 1 , 238 P. 316, 320 (1925). A certificate of indebtedness is an obligation “having practically the same force and effect as a bond”. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. (1991).
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 14, 2024
See Garrett v. … (alteration omitted) (quoting Brown v. Barrow, 512 F.3d 1304, 1307 (11th Cir. 2008))). c.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBoard of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. Cryan
638 P.2d 437 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1981
Seay v. Howell, 311 P.2d 207 (Okl.1957), overruling McKee v. DeGraffenreid, 33 Okl. 136 , 124 P. 303 , (1912). … Those citations are: Davis v. Murphy, 199 Okl. 545 , 188 P.2d 229 (1947); Fagin v. Thoroughman, 190 Okl. 649 , 126 P.2d 982 (1942); Cannon v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedRed Dog Saloon v. Board of Adjustment
791 P.2d 112 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1989
MEMORANDUM OPINION HANSEN, Presiding Judge: This case arises from an application for a zoning variance to the Oklahoma City Board of Adjustment (Board) (Defendant/Appellant). … Vinson v. Medley, 737 P.2d 932 (Okla.1987). A proceeding to review a board’s decision either to grant or deny a variance is equitable in nature. Banks v. City of Bethany, 541 P.2d 178 (Okla.1975).
Cited 0 timesPublishedIngram v. Board of Com'rs of Pottawatomie County
144 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1930
Black v. Geissler, 58 Okla. 335 , 159 Pac. 1124 ; Fast v. Rogers, Co. Treas., 30 Okla. 289 , 119 Pac. 241 ; Racy v. Racy, 12 Okla. 650 , 73 Pac. 305 . Section 5834, C. O. … This court, in Board of Com’rs of Okmulgee County v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJackson v. Board of County Com'rs of Garvin County
66 Okla. 75 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 28, 1917
In the Board of County Commissioners of Washita County v. … Board of County Commissioners, 44 Okla. 164 , 143 Pac. 1145 ; Zeigler v. Board of County Commissioners, 44 Okla. *78 266, 144 Pac. 381 ; Morrow v. Board of Commissioners, 31 Okla. 636 , 122 Pac. 168 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedOklahoma State Board of Equalization v. Craig
749 P.2d 1132 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1988
See Hale v. Bd. of Cty. Com’rs. of Seminole Cty., 12 Isbell v. State, Etc. 13 and Poafpybitty v. … Department of Human Services v. Malibie, Okl., 630 P.2d 310, 312-314 [1981; State ex rel. Blankenship v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSmith v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma County
201 Okla. 652 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 22, 1949
In Board of County Commissioners of Osage County et al. v. … Under the rules stated, the Board of County Commissioner of Osage County v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBoard of Equalization v. Indian Terr. Illuminating Oil Co.
159 Okla. 15 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 17, 1932
After a hearing before that board it was ordered that the property be placed upon the ¡tax rolls for the year 1929. The defendant appealed to the district court. … In Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, 269 U. S. 614 , 70 L.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBaker v. Board of County Com'rs of Okmulgee County
48 Okla. 737 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1915
Coggeshall v. Connor, 31 Okla. 113 , 120 Pac. 559 , 39 L. R. A. (N. S.) 81, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 577; Board of County Commissioners of Washita County v. Brett, 32 Okla. 853 , 124 Pac. 57 ; State v. … Hooker, 26 Okla. 467 , 109 Pac. 527 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Twyford [ 39 Okla. 230 ], 134 Pac. 968 .” Zeigler v. Board of Com’rs of Grant County, 44 Okla. 266 , 144 Pac. 381 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedBoard of County Com'rs of Oklahoma County v. Seymour
45 Okla. 533 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1915
As was said in the case of Gilfeather v. Grout, 101 App. Div. 154 , 91 N. Y. … In the present proceeding counsel for the warrant holder concedes the soundness of the opinion rendered in Seymour v. Oklahoma City, 38 Okla. 547 , 134 Pac. 45 , 47 L. R. A. (N.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDelaware County v. Board of Com'rs of Delaware County
56 Okla. 81 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 29, 1916
On October 8, 1918, the board of county commissioners passed the following resolution: “Be it resolved by the board of county commissioners, of Delaware county, Okla.: “That said board finds the following banks situated in … Co. v. State, 43 Okla. 368 , 143 Pac. 37 . By the Court: It is so ordered.
Cited 5 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. State Board of Agriculture v. Warren
331 P.2d 405 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1958
McCain v. State Election Board, 144 Okl. 85 , 289 P. 759 ; Elliott v. State ex rel. Kirkpatrick, 150 Okl. 275 , 1 P.2d 370 . … Bell v. United Farm Agency, Old., 296 P.2d 149 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedCosden v. Board of Education of City of Tulsa
60 Okla. 214 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1916
thereto to find, if we can, any grant of power conferred upon the board by either the Constitution or the Legislature, or if there is any limitation upon the right of the board of education to deal with its property of this … the general right of conveying the property as the judgment of the board might dictate.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of County Com'rs v. Eastern Oklahoma Pub. Co.
120 Okla. 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1926
And in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Kay County v. … In Allen et al. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna