Case law

Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Board, United States of America v. Federal Maritime Board

275 F.2d 184 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 4, 1960

The Board should, at least, “make the basis of its action reasonably clear. We cannot find that it did so here.” Radio Station KFH Co. v. … We dismissed for want of jurisdiction a petition for direct review of the Board’s order in this court, expressing no opinion as to the District Court’s jurisdietion of the present suit. Pacific Far East Line v.

Paul Hammontree v. National Labor Relations Board

894 F.2d 438 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 1990

In Alexander v. … In Barrentine v.

Downtown Cluster of Congregations v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

675 A.2d 484 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1996

A decision of the Board will not be set aside unless it is clearly erroneous or inconsistent with the zoning regulations. Silverstone v. … The Board concluded, however, relying on Clerics of Saint Viator, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Kohler Company

351 F.2d 798 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 2, 1965

B. v. … Act, Phelps Dodge Corp. v N.

David Goldwasser v. Harold Brown, Secretary of the Air Force

417 F.2d 1169 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 17, 1969

Bishop v. McKee, 400 F.2d 87 (10th Cir. 1968); Brown v. Zuckert, 349 F.2d 461 (7th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 998 , 86 S.Ct. 588 , 15 L.Ed.2d 486 (1966); and McTiernan v. Gronouski, 337 F.2d 31 (2d Cir. 1964). … Appellant and appellees join in identifying Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968), as the most relevant authority.

Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of Parole

631 F. Supp. 435 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 1986

See Olim v. … .); Lucas v.

Lowe v. Surface Transportation Board

540 F. App'x 6 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 2013

Since Offerors could have presented both arguments to the Board before its final decision but did not, we find the issues forfeited. See United States v. L.A. … See Johnson v.

Allen v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

663 A.2d 489 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1995

v. … On these facts, the Board reasonably relied on Curtis v.

Board of Directors v. Resolution Trust Corp.

173 B.R. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 14, 1994

Chestnut I, 161 B.R. at 862 (citing Steyr-Daimler-Puch of America Corp. v. Pappas, 852 F.2d 132, 135-36 (4th Cir.1988)). … Teltronics Services, Inc. v.

Gibson v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board

785 A.2d 1238 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 2001

Public Employee Relations Board v. Washington Teachers’ Union Local 6, 556 A.2d 206, 207 (D.C.1989). … District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board, 655 A.2d 320, 323 (D.C.1995) (quoting District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. CNN America, Inc.

865 F.3d 740 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 2017

Browning-Ferris, 362 NLRB No. 186 , at 13. … In fact, whether the Board did so in Browning-Ferris is a question' at issue in a petition for review of that decision that is currently pending before another panel of this court. See Browning-Ferris Indus, of Cal. v.

Brown-Forman Co. v. Beech Hill Distilling Co.

30 App. D.C. 485 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1908

The president of the Brown-Forman Company admitted that *487 he learned of the use of the trademark “J. 0. … The facts bring this case within the ruling in Natural Food Co v. Williams, present Term, ante, p. 348, and Worster Brewing Co. v. Bueter, present Term, ante, p. 428.

Parsons v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

61 A.3d 650 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 2013

Petitioner Charles Parsons seeks review of an order of the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment (“BZA”) granting special exceptions from zoning requirements in connection with proposed construction by one of Mr

Chevron Mining, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

684 F.3d 1318 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 3, 2012

Corp. v. … V For the foregoing reasons, CMI’s petition for review is denied and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement is granted. So ordered. .

In Re Brown

890 A.2d 260 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 2006

In re Brown, 845 A.2d 519, 520 (D.C.2004). … See Brown, supra, 845 A.2d at 522 .

United States v. Warren Brown, A/K/A Prince Asiel

823 F.2d 591 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 1987

Appellant Warren Brown is the head of one of the Nation’s ministries, which is located in Chicago; appellants James Stone and Gerald Bethea are members of Brown’s staff. Appellant J.C. … In Pinkerton v.

American Importers Association v. Civil Aeronautics Board

473 F.2d 168 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 29, 1972

National Air Carrier Ass’n v. CAB, supra. TV. … Compare WAIT Radio v. FCC, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 317 , 418 F.2d 1153 (1969).

Gerber v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

499 A.2d 1193 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1985

Spevak v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 407 A.2d 549, 553 (D.C.1979). … Spevak v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, supra, 407 A.2d at 555 .

Cheney Railroad Company, Inc. v. Railroad Retirement Board, Tyson Railroad, Inc. v. Railroad Retirement Board

50 F.3d 1071 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 1995

Because the ICA and the Staggers Rail Act are not the Board’s governing statutes, but rather are administered by the Commission, Society of Plastics Indus., Inc. v. … V 1993). 14 . The Board did not assist in the detection or resolution of this difference.

Metropolitan Washington Board of Trade v. Public Service Commission

432 A.2d 343 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 20, 1981

Petitioner Board of Trade has demonstrated no “fatal flaw” with respect to this aspect of the Commission’s decision. Goodman v. Public Service Commission, supra, 309 A.2d at 101 . … V.