Case law

Roberts v. Stith

383 P.2d 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1963

If the claim were established, defendants’ compensation was to' be one-third of that portion of the estate which would be distributed to plaintiff as Pearl McKinley’s common-law husband. … and write; that he was a member of the Armed Forces of this country during the last world war; that he reached the rank of sergeant; that he owned land in Osage County; that he was as intelligent as the average person (a qualified

Robert K. Bell Enterprises, Inc. v. Tulsa County Fairgrounds Trust Authority

695 P.2d 513 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1985

The cases cited by appellant in support of its proposition clearly demonstrate the requirement that a deprivation of federal rights under color of local law is necessary to state a cause of action under section 1983. 11 These … any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities

White v. Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County

267 P.2d 579 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1954

“We, the undersigned, being the' individual duly elected, qualified and acting members of the Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, do for ourselves, individually, affirm as follows: “1. … A state road as projected or established may be designated or established as a limited access facility, 69 O.S.1951 § 11.1 et seq.

Personal Loan & Finance Co. of Capitol Hill v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

437 P.2d 1015 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1968

The taxpayer contends that its debt is clearly in the category of note indebtedness of three years or less and is deductible for the purpose of determining taxable capital. … power, privilege or right inuring to” it,, within this State and requires payment of the tax for the right to exist as a corporation and enjoy under the protection of the State the powers, rights, privileges: and1 *1019 Immunities

Opinion No. 68-234 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 29, 1968

in the instant case, is to participate in the financing of this integrated turkey project, provided it is not legally prevented from so doing because of the fact that one phase of the project, if taken alone, might not qualify … established by an industrial development agency in Oklahoma."

Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

679 P.2d 1296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1984

To achieve these purposes, the Legislature authorized the Board to issue by public sale its investment certificates and to use proceeds from these to make loans to eligible public entities 1 for qualified water projects. … expressed or necessarily implied purpose, is as clearly void as if in express terms forbidden....

Flowers v. Flowers

117 Okla. 209 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1925

under the homestead laws of the United States, who, on March 16, 1896, was a bona fide occupant of laud within the territory established as Greer county, Okla., shall be entitled to .continue his occupation of such land … We think the finding of the court, that this real estate was the separate property of the deceased at the time of his marriage, is clearly erroneous. In the case of the United States v.

Dowell v. Board of Education

606 F. Supp. 1548 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1985

Similarly, middle schools (grades 6-8) were desegregated by the establishment of attendance zones for each school. … The Supreme Court has clearly stated that “official action will not be held unconstitutional solely because it results in a racially disproportionate impact.” Arlington Heights v.

In Re Adoption of Baby Boy Kb

264 P.3d 1258 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 2011

At the conclusion of those proceedings the judge held that T.R. clearly exercised his paternal rights and that he made monetary contributions to the natural mother during her pregnancy. … STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶ 7 "An abuse of discretion occurs when a trial court exercises its discretion `to an end or purpose not justified by, and clearly against, reason and evidence.

Hoffman v. County Commissioners

3 Okla. 325 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 7, 1895

duly qualified as provided by law, and then, and not until then, is issue taken. … After the assessment is made this municipality comes clearly within the statute.

MAXWELL v. SPRINT PCS

2016 OK 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 2016

None of the records in these cases clearly provide the difference in rating had a different edition of the Guides been used. … The Claimant qualified for the maximum rate of temporary total disability compensation, but Goodyear paid the claimant her regular wages, which were at a higher rate than that required by statute.

Opinion No. (1995)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 24, 1995

Counties obtain the authority to establish county hospitals under the provisions of 19 O.S. 1991 , §§ 781-796[19-781-796]. … Likewise it is clear that from the three, two are qualified to be a lessee, i.e., a charitable nonprofit organization and a public trust where the county is the beneficiary.

Frost v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma

26 F.2d 508 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1927

This act does not grant to any railroad company privileges or immunities which, upon the same terms, do not equally belong to every other railroad company. … Whenever a company comes into any class, it has all the ‘privileges and immunities’ that have been granted by the statute to any other company in that class.

Barsh v. Mullins

338 P.2d 845 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1959

Hall had vision in only one eye and, therefore, under the Interstate Commerce Safety regulations was not qualified to drive in interstate commerce. … The case is clearly distinguishable from those cases in which'a covenant not to sue one joint toi’t-feasor does not protect another joint toi't-feasor from an action for damages brought against it by an injured party.”

ALFALFA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. v. MID-CONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY

350 P.3d 1276 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 2014

[or] to establish or create (something unwanted) in a forceful way." Webster's Third International Dictionary, p. 1186. … This language is clearly inapplicable to the facts of this case. 7 .

Carey Lumber Co. v. Hetherington

107 F. Supp. 995 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1952

This statute when followed enables a defendant to obtain a release of the lien, and to avoid interest, attorney’s fee and costs where he can establish that the lien-holder is demanding more than he is entitled. … The court is of the opinion that the legislature by section 147 has set clearly the pattern to be followed to release a mechanics’ and materialmen’s lien. The defendant has not qualified.

Moore v. State

736 P.2d 161 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1987

She offered incriminating evidence against appellant after having been granted immunity. … Appellant fails to establish any of the elements listed above.

Davis v. Fed. Ins. Co.

382 F. Supp. 3d 1189 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 8, 2019

Niblo-who the parties agree is the only qualified medical expert in this case. … Mosley's death qualified as a covered loss under the Policy's terms.

Taylor v. State

889 P.2d 319 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1995

Clearly, the DNA match evidence was pertinent to this inquiry and thus sufficiently relevant to have warranted admission. … These numbers clearly helped the jury appreciate the significance of the DNA match evidence.

TAY v. GREEN

509 P.3d 615 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 2022

Moreover, Section 3 establishes when and to whom dispensaries may begin recreational-marijuana sales and requires the marijuana regulatory agency to adopt regulations authorizing residential delivery. ¶5 Section 4 establishes … With respect to any qualifying "person who has completed his or her sentence for a conviction . . .