Case law

Oregon Firearms Educational Foundation v. Board of Higher Education

245 Or. App. 713 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 28, 2011

In Starrett v. … More recently, in Doe v.

Jancsek v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

162 Or. App. 96 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 4, 1999

the Board to increase his sentence by more than one standard variation, or 36 months. … Because the Board’s size changed after the rule’s repeal in 1988, there was no opportunity or reason to change those precise numbers in the rale. The Board could not amend a repealed rule.

Penk v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

99 F.R.D. 511 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 5, 1983

Compare Brennan v. Midwestern United Life Insurance Co., 450 F.2d 999 (7th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 921 , 92 S.Ct. 957 , 30 L.Ed.2d 792 (1972) with Wainwright v. Kraftco Corp., 54 F.R.D. 532 (N.D.Ga.1972). … Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 26.64[1] (2nd Ed.1982), the landmark case of Hickman v.

Weiss v. Board of County Commissioners of Jackson County

8 Or. 529 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1880

(Lewis v. Lewis, 4 Or. 210 .) The objections to the undertaking are, however, well taken. The service of the notice must precede the filing of the undertaking for an appeal. (Dooling v. Moore, 19 Cal. 81 ; Buckholder v.

Brown v. Multnomah County Assessor

Oregon Tax Court · Jul 29, 2025

Enterprises, Inc. v. … In Phillips v.

J. L. Ward Co. v. Landscape Contractors Board

142 Or. App. 438 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 1996

Ward Co. v. Landscape Contractors Board, 141 Or App 181 , 916 P2d 887 (1996). We allow the motion, modify our opinion and adhere to it as modified. … See, e.g., Rhorer v.

Forelaws On Board v. Energy Facility Siting Council

307 Or. 327 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1989

Forelaws on Board v. Energy Facility Siting Coun., 84 Or App 433 , 734 P2d 370 (1987). The merits of that court’s decision are not before us. … Forelaws on Board v. Energy Fac. Siting Council, 303 Or 541 , 738 P2d 973 (1987). It follows that the Court of Appeals never had jurisdiction in this matter.

DeCouteau v. SAIF Corp.

86 Or. App. 502 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 22, 1987

In reversing the referee, the Board examined neither the rule nor the cases, as Brown requires that it do. Instead, it applied a broadly formulated rule that it had adopted in a prior Board decision. … “Accordingly, we must reverse and remand to the Board for reconsideration under the appropriate law. A decision about ‘good cause’ is for the Board to make in the first instance. Brown v.

Escalderon v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

227 Or. App. 506 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 15, 2009

App. 506 ESCALDERON v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. Court of Appeals of Oregon. April 15, 2009. Affirmed without opinion.

SAIF Corp. v. Curtis

107 Or. App. 625 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 1991

In 1980, when our review of workers’ compensation cases was de novo, the Supreme Court said, in Brown v. … Court’s comment in Brown.

Oregonian Publishing Co. v. Oregon State Board of Parole

95 Or. App. 501 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 1989

See City of Portland v. Rice, 94 Or App 292, 295 , 765 P2d 228 (1988). … That is a legislative clarification of the application of ORS 192.690 to PSRB *507 and is consistent with this decision. 6 See Kaiser Cement v. Tax Com., 250 Or 374, 378 , 443 P2d 233 (1968); see also Layman v.

Union Oil Co. v. Clackamas County Board of Commissioners

67 Or. App. 27 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 22, 1984

Defendants appeal a judgment reversing a determination by the Board of County Commissioners of Clackamas County that plaintiff did not have a “vested right” to build a service station in violation of county land use regulations … For a discussion of liability for failure to give notice, see Universal Ideas v. Linn County, 64 Or App 805 , 669 P2d 1165 (1983).

Henderson v. Employment Division

22 Or. App. 378 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 1975

This unemployment compensation case involves the same basic issue as Evjen v. Employment Division, 22 Or App 372 , 539 P2d 662 (1975); Brown v. Employment Division, 22 Or App 382 , 539 P2d 666 (1975); and Bird v. … The Employment Appeals Board reversed on this ground. Absent an explanation of this fact, the Employment Appeals Board action would have been correct. See, Brown and Bird .

Shelby v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

351 Or. 507 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2011

272 P.3d 742 (2011) 351 Or. 507 SHELBY v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. (S059847). Supreme Court of Oregon. December 29, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.

Sabin v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

348 Or. 414 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 11, 2010

233 P.3d 817 (2010) 348 Or. 414 SABIN v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S058305). Supreme Court of Oregon. June 11, 2010. Petition for Review Denied.

Smith v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

245 Or. App. 504 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 14, 2011

App. 504 SMITH v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. A134722. Court of Appeals of Oregon. September 14, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.

Mueller v. Cupp

45 Or. App. 495 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 24, 1980

Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, supra, at 28. … Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, supra, at 28.

Baker v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

245 Or. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 17, 2011

App. 165 BAKER v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. A142510 Court of Appeals of Oregon. August 17, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.

Gruszczynski v. State of Oregon Board of Higher Education

106 Or. App. 260 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 6, 1991

Respondents contend that the Board’s action was not an “order,” because petitioner was an employee of the Board. … All employees of the state system of higher education, including EOSC, are employees of the Board. ORS 351.070(1)(a); ORS 352.002; Papadopoulos v.

Hendricks v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

350 Or. 571 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 28, 2011

258 P.3d 526 (2011) 350 Or. 571 HENDRICKS v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S059489). Supreme Court of Oregon. July 28, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.