Case law

Board of Education of City of Clinton v. Houilston

51 Okla. 329 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1915

V.' … V. Gilliland, was present at this time.

Patzkowsky v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Board of Agriculture

217 P.3d 146 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 2008

facilities at issue to a third party after Land O'Lakes is licensed by the Board, thereby failing to disclose the identity of the real applicant, and that the Board failed to enforce and/or unlawfully amended its own rule … Peters v. Wallace, 1927 OK 279 , 260 P. 42 . T4 All of Appellants' arguments are dependent on those facts, and we must disregard them. Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed.

Mater v. State

9 Okla. Crim. 722 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 10, 1913

Brown, were tried and convicted at the July, 1911, term of the superior court of Logan county on a charge of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same. … Brown, at a fine of fifty dollars and thirty days’ imprisonment. We have carefully examined the record, and find no error sufficient to justify a reversal. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Broadrick v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Personnel Board

338 F. Supp. 711 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1972

United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75 , 67 S.Ct. 556 , 91 L.Ed. 754 (1947); Gray v. City of Toledo, D.C., 323 F.Supp. 1281 (1971). Stack v. … Gray v. City of Toledo, D.C., 323 F.Supp. 1281 (1971). Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Committee, 372 U.S. 539 , 83 S.Ct. 889 , 9 L.Ed.2d 929 (1963). N. A. A. C. P. v.

Board of County Commissioners v. Guaranty Loan & Investment Corp.

497 P.2d 423 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 16, 1972

Co. v. Board of County Com’rs, Okl., 389 P.2d 476 , which is determinative. … This argument has been considered and rejected in Hazlett v. Board of County Com’rs, 168 Okl. 290 , 32 P.2d 940 .

Hale v. Board of County Commissioners of Seminole County

603 P.2d 761 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1979

If the proceeding is brought pursuant to a resolution of the board of county commissioners, it must be styled “The Board of County Commissioners of_Co. v._” [Smith v. … Brown, 8 Okl.Cr. 40 , 126 P. 245, 249 [1912] and Buck v. Dick, Warden, 27 Okl. 854 , 113 P. 920 [1911], the marketplace reality contradicts such notion.

Marcus v. State ex rel. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

411 P.2d 539 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1966

Randles v. Washington State Liquor Control Board, 33 Wash.2d 688 , 206 P.2d 1209 , 9 A.L.R.2d 531 . … In Bayha v.

Albright Title & Trust Co. v. Banking Board

737 P.2d 925 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1987

Citizens Security Bank & Trust v. Banking Board, 627 P.2d 423, 426 (Okl.1981). … Grand River Dam Authority v. State, 645 P.2d 1011 (Okl.1982).

Cole v. District Board of School Dist. No. 29

32 Okla. 692 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1912

They brought action to compel the district board to admit them. … In Gilliland v. Board of Education, 141 N. C. 482 , 54 S.

Board of County Com'rs v. Johnson Oil Refining Co.

167 Okla. 452 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 27, 1934

The judgments of this court were there reversed (Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. Oklahoma, 54 S. Ct. 152 , 78 L. … Travis v. Dickey, 96 Okla. 256 , 222 P. 527 ; Union Refrigerator Co. v. Lynch, 177 U. S. 149 .

Hale Computer Systems, Inc. v. Banking Board

736 P.2d 993 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1983

Burk v. Oklahoma City, 522 P.2d 612 (Okl.1973) [creation of common fund] and City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Owens, 565 P.2d 4 (Okl.1977) [misconduct of litigant]. . State ex rel. Poulos v. … Allgood v. Allgood, 626 P.2d 1323, 1327 (Okl.1981). . Ridley Packing Co. v. Holliday, 467 P.2d 480 (Okl.1970). .

Board of County Com'rs of Jackson County v. Owen

196 Okla. 538 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1946

King v. McCurdy, 171 Okla. 445 , 43 P.2d 124 , and Seaman v. Chesnut, 190 Okla. 582 , 71 P.2d 965 . The defendant relies upon City of Hollis v. Gould, 190 Okla. 335 , 123 P.2d 241 , and 29 C. J. 377. … Friend v. Holcombe, 196 Okla. 111 , 162 P.2d 1008 .

Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa v. Shore

207 Okla. 381 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1952

Construing this section of the Code we held in Luke, Ex’r, v. … (City of Tulsa v.

Wiles v. Board of Com'rs of Alfalfa County

178 Okla. 341 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1936

Shelton v. State, 62 Okla. 105 -8, 162 P. 224 . See, also, Board of County Commissioners *343 v. Culwell, 41 Okla. 712 , 139 P. 979 ; Carrico v. Couch, 45 Okla. 672 , 146 P. 447 ; Board of County Commissioners v. … Bruce, 51 Okla. 541 , 152 P. 125 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Mathews, 147 Okla. 296 , 296 P. 481 .

Board of Education of City of Sapulpa v. McMahan

26 Okla. 588 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1910

lower court held that the general initiative and referendum laws as contained in articles 5 and 18 of’ *589 the Constitution and chapter 44 of the Session Laws of 1907-08 had no application to a resolution passed by the board … This question seems to have been-settled by the case of Board of Education of the City of Ardmore et al. v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. I. R.

Scott v. Oklahoma State Board of Education

618 P.2d 410 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1980

Until the third year is completed, limited by the statutory requirement that notice of non-renewal be given by April ( 70 O.S. 1971 , § 6-101), the public employer represented by the board of education may decide whether … Cavett v. Geary Board of Education, Okl., 587 P.2d 991 (1978), not squarely in point since the argument there was that the Board had resolved to issue a fourth year’s contract but changed its mind before April 10th.

Williams Natural Gas Co. v. . State Board of Equalization

65 O.B.A.J. 4201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1994

See also State v. Colonial Pipeline Co., 471 So.2d 408 (Ala. Civ. App.1984); Federal Express Corp. v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization, 717 S.W.2d 873 (Tenn.1986). … See Arizona v. Atchison T. & S.F.R., 656 F.2d 398 (9th Cir.1981); Louisville & N.R. v. Louisiana Tax Comm’n, 498 F.Supp. 418, 421 (D.La.1980); Tennessee v.

Pottawatomie County, Excise Board v. Standish Pipe Line Co.

189 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1941

The excise board takes the contrary view. In Oklahoma County Excise Board v. J. M. … Jewett et al. v. School Dist. No. 25 in Fremont Co., 49 Wyo. 277 , 54 P. 2d 546; Midland Special School Dist. of Sebastian County, Ark., v. Central Trust Co. of Illinois, 1 F. 2d 124 .

Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. Melton

428 P.2d 205 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1967

The reasoning, and the conclusion urged, acknowledge our prior decisions in Thrasher v. Board of Governors, etc., Okl., 359 P.2d 717 , and Rushing v. Board of Governors, etc., (Cons.) Okl., 391 P.2d 796 . … Thrasher v. Board of Governors, supra. In such cases injunction is a proper remedy. Curtis v. Registered Dentists, 193 Okl. 233 , 143 P.2d 427 ; Board of Governors, etc. v. Crouch, supra.

Standish Pipe Line Co. v. Oklahoma County Excise Board

193 Okla. 130 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1943

J. 529, § 531; Kirkham v. B. F. Fullerton & Son, 32 Okla. 461 , 122 P. 652 ; Oklahoma Producing & Refining Corp. v. Pennock Oil Co., 118 Okla. 170 , 247 P. 667 . … Board of County Com’rs v. Oklahoma Creosoted Lumber & Piling Co., 181 Okla. 561 , 75 P. 2d 1093 . We find no error in the decision of the Court of Tax Review. The judgment is therefore affirmed. CORN, C.