Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

5.37s

  • Hartmann v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    48 N.J. 356 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 13, 1966

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Contant v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    41 N.J. 124 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1963

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • De Rose v. Board of Review

    6 N.J. Super. 164 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 16, 1950

    DE ROSE, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued January 9, 1950. Decided January 16, 1950. *165 Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW. Mr. Frank G. … Valenti v. Board of Review, 4 N.J. Super. 162 ( App. Div. 1949). Affirmed with costs.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Board of Health

    208 N.J. Super. 415 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 5, 1986

    See DiGirolamo v. Newark, 2 N.J.Tax 323, 326-328 (Tax Ct.1981). … See Group Health Ins. of N.J. v. Howell, 40 N.J. 436, 445 (1963).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Goldstein v. Lincoln Park Planning Board

    52 N.J. Super. 44 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 16, 1958

    Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N.J. 94, 103 (1957). … Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, supra, 24 N.J. at page 103 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Board of Justices v. Fennimore

    1 N.J.L. 190 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1793

    The case in Strange is of the former class of cases and clearly distinguishable from the present, (b) Note — See Nimmo’s Executor v. Commonwealth 4 Hen. and Munf. 57.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pappas v. Board of Adjustment

    254 N.J. Super. 52 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 14, 1992

    Hughes v. Washington, 389 U.S. 290, 298 , 88 S.Ct. 438, 443 , 19 L.Ed.2d 530, 536 (1967) (Stewart, J., concurring). In Sheerr v. … In Morris County Land v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ross v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    90 N.J.L. 522 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1917

    Board of Health, all analogy is lacking with respect to the obligation to perform such duties as are non-governmental, which is precisely the ground upon which the doctrine of Stuhr v. Cur-ran is founded. … Boylan v. Jersey City.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    76 N.J. Super. 42 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 3, 1962

    (Emphasis supplied) To the same effect was Tobin v. Knaggs, 107 S. W. 677 (Tex. Civ. … In the case. of Evening Journal Ass’n v. MacPhail, 45 N. J.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    63 N.J.L. 57 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1899

    Freeholders of Camden, 18 Vroom 454 ; Simon v. Hoboken, 23 Id. 367; Bilderbaek v. Freeholders of Salem, ante p. 55. … Daily v. Freeholders of Essex, 29 Vroom 319 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Nilsen v. New Jersey Parole Board

    122 N.J. 196 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 26, 1990

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Citizens Ice & Cold Storage Co.

    72 N.J. Eq. 437 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 2, 1907

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • M.B. v. Teaneck Board of Education

    117 N.J. 49 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 19, 1989

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Lammers v. Board of Education

    260 N.J. Super. 390 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 17, 1992

    See the explanation of such classification in Cohen v. Emerson Bd. of Educ., 225 N.J.Super. 324 , 327 n. 1, 542 A.2d 489 (App.Div.1988). … The State Board cited as authority for this proposition Sayreville Educ. Ass’n v. Board *394 of Educ., 193 N.J.Super. 424 , 474 A.2d 1091 (App.Div.1984).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ahrensfield v. State Board of Education

    126 N.J.L. 543 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 25, 1941

    without necessarily implying that it is the sole deter *544 minative consideration, that it was found as a fact below that the resignations submitted by prosecutrix were wholly voluntary, in no sense induced by the local board … of education or by coercion exerted by the supervising principal, who in this behalf was not representing the local board.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lovejoy v. Piscataway Board of Education

    101 N.J. 323 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 23, 1985

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Fenneck v. N.J. State Parole Board

    99 N.J. 224 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 14, 1985

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Gloucester County Welfare Board v. State

    91 N.J. 570 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 1982

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • De Francesco v. Board of Education

    91 N.J. 252 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 2, 1982

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Masters v. Union Beach Planning Board

    85 N.J. 467 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 21, 1980

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.