Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.83s
Jewell v. SAIF Corp. (In re Jewell)
291 Or. App. 703 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 16, 2018
v. … Rather, the medical evidence supports the board's finding that claimant's symptoms were caused by preexisting conditions in her elbow and shoulder. Citing this court's opinion in Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNichelson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
144 Or. App. 492 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 1996
Cited 0 timesPublishedDawson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
123 Or. App. 619 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993
See, e.g., State v. Wille, 317 Or 487, 501-02 , 858 P2d 128 (1993); State v. Perez, 119 Or App 436, 439 , 851 P2d 617 (1993). … Glasser v. Board of Parole, 123 Or App 610 , 860 P2d 832 (1993); Rise v. Board of Parole, 117 Or App 265 , 843 P2d 997 (1992), rev den 315 Or 443 (1993). Affirmed. Or Laws 1987, ch 2, § 14.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState Land Board v. Western-Pacific Dredging Corp.
244 Or. 184 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1966
Co. v. State Tax Com., 1937, 156 Or 505, 511 , 62 P2d 7 . The proceeds derived from any use of the lands became a part of the Common School Fund. ORS 274.600 (3). … We have examined the decision in Bostick v. Smoot Sand & Gravel Corporation, (CCA 4th, 1958) 260 F2d 534. To the extent that the case is analogous to the one at hand, we cannot agree with it.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTodd v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
161 Or. App. 143 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 16, 1999
The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board) anticipated a good-time release date of March 3,1997. … The state contends that, as we recognized in Ventris v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBarnes v. Cache Valley Electric
339 Or. App. 371 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 2025
The board did not apply an incorrect legal standard or err in upholding employer’s denial of the spon- dylosis. Cf. Pedro v. SAIF, 313 Or App 34, 495 P3d 183 (2021) 376 Barnes v. … Brown, 361 Or at 251.
Cited 1 timesPublishedRivas-Valles v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
275 Or. App. 761 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 30, 2015
Thus, the board’s reasoning connected “the facts of the case and the result reached.” Jenkins v. Board of Parole, 356 Or 186, 208 , 335 P3d 828 (2014). … Brundridge v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedWilson v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
222 Or. App. 224 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 2008
For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the disposition in Norris v. Board of Parole, 331 Or 194 , 13 P3d 104 (2000), cert den, 534 US 1028 (2001), is conclusive. Accordingly, we affirm. … In Norris, the court stated that, as of the date that the board concluded that the petitioner was capable of rehabilitation, “the Board must change the first of petitioner’s life sentences to life with the possibility of
Cited 2 timesPublishedDavidson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
140 Or. App. 72 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 27, 1996
“Thus, the board may terminate the sentence by discharging petitioner from parole. … See PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 611 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993); Massee and Massee, 138 Or App 589, 596 , 911 P2d 320 (1996).
Cited 2 timesPublishedAssociated Reforestation Contractors, Inc. v. State Workers' Compensation Board
59 Or. App. 348 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1982
Gates v. McClure, 284 Or 685 , 588 P2d 32 (1978). … Kuhns et ux v. State Tax Com., 223 Or 547, 554 , 355 P2d 249 (1960).
Cited 8 timesPublishedCentral School District 13J v. Marion District Boundary Board
88 Or. App. 85 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 21, 1987
Marion Board’s order is not subject to review by either the State Board of Education or this court until Polk Board approves it. See Steamboaters v. … We note, however, that our opinion in Kumley v. Polk Co. Dist.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBlacknall v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
221 Or. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 2008
The board revoked petitioner’s parole and ordered a future disposition hearing. … Petitioner later requested that the board reconsider its revocation order; the board agreed to do so and, in May 2005, it held a revocation hearing.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOregon Tax Court · Mar 30, 2017
BROWN and MEREDITH BROWN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) TC-MD 160378G ) … v. ) ) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ) State of Oregon, )
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedD & M Products, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Board
30 Or. App. 707 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 1977
Pursuant to its continuing jurisdiction, the Board is authorized to reconsider claims which it initially determined were noncompensable, Fields v. … Neeley v. Compensation Dept., 246 Or 522, 524-525 , 426 P2d 460 (1967); Marbet v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHouck v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
125 Or. App. 461 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 1993
OAR 255-35-014, 2 the *465 Board’s rule implementing ORS 137.551, incorporates that statutory requirement. … court orders a sentence shorter than the applicable prison term, the Board shall apply OAR 255-35-025.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedClay v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
218 Or. App. 229 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 2008
App. 229 CLAY v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. A129816 Court of Appeals of Oregon. February 20, 2008. Affirmed without opinion.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOregon Shores Conservation Coalition v. Board of County Commissioners
243 Or. App. 298 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 2011
In Davis v. … Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of Commissioners, 237 Or App 149, 152 , 238 P3d 1016 (2010), rev allowed, 349 Or 602 (2011).
Cited 2 timesPublishedOregon Firearms Educational Foundation v. Board of Higher Education
245 Or. App. 713 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 28, 2011
In Starrett v. … More recently, in Doe v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBarnes v. Cache Valley Electric
339 Or. App. 371 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 2025
The board did not apply an incorrect legal standard or err in upholding employer’s denial of the spon- dylosis. Cf. Pedro v. SAIF, 313 Or App 34, 495 P3d 183 (2021) 376 Barnes v. … Brown, 361 Or at 251.
Cited 1 timesPublishedVan Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners
52 Or. App. 749 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 15, 1981
Webb v. Clark, 274 Or 387, 391 , 546 P2d 1078 ; Myers v. MHI Investments, Inc., 44 Or App 467 , 606 P2d 652 , rev den 289 Or 107 (1980). … "Category V "10.
Cited 11 timesPublished
Ask Donna