Case law

Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc County v. Campbell

189 Okla. 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1941

Board of Com’rs of Carter County v. Landrum, 163 Okla. 199 , 21 P. 2d 736 ; State for Use of First State Bank of Wister et al. v. Board of County Com’rs of Le Flore Co., 177 Okla. 470 , 60 P. 2d 788 ; Trudgeon v. … In Board of County Com’rs of Osage County et al. v.

Scanland v. Board of Com'rs of Ottawa County

56 Okla. 56 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 29, 1916

Plaintiffs contend upon the authority of Choate v. Trapp, 224 U. S. 665 , 32 Sup. Ct. 565, 56 L. Ed. 941 , and New Jersey v. Wilson, 7 Cranch, 164, 3 L. Ed. 303 , and Bowling v. United States, *61 233 U. … Following Shock v. Sweet, 45 Okla. 51 , 145 Pac. 388 , it has been held by.this court in the case of Rogers v.

Central Light & Fuel Co. v. State Board of Equalization

51 Okla. 407 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1915

For convenience, the corporation .will be designated herein as plaintiff in error, and the State Board of Equalization the defendant in error. … The report of the referee should be approved, and the action of the State Board of Equalization affirmed. By the Court: It is so ordered.

Board of Ed. v. Philadelphia Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

156 Okla. 7 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 22, 1932

Co. v. Board of Ed., 131 Okla. 39 , 267 P. 639 . … Ry. v.

State Ex Rel. Wiseman v. Oklahoma Board of Corrections

614 P.2d 551 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 15, 1980

Regents of State University v. Trapp, 28 Okl. 83 , 113 P. 910 (1911), and Peebly v. … V, Okl. Const.

State ex rel. Scanland v. John A. Brown Co.

206 Okla. 136 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1952

HALLEY, V. C. J. … In Smilie v.

Board of Comrs. of Roger Mills Co. v. Rowden

8 Okla. 406 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

.: This was an action brought in the district court of Roger Mills county on July 12, 1897, by Sat Rowden, defendant in error, against the board of commissioners of Roger Mills county, plaintiff in error, to *407 recover … This case comes clearly within the principle announced in the case of Board of Com’rs of Roger Mills Co. v.

Baxter v. Board of Com'rs of Rogers County

113 Okla. 285 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1925

The case of Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County v. L. W. Baxter et al., No. 15777, 113 Okla. 280 , 241 Pac. 752 , is controlling- in this appeal, and operates to cause the affirmance thereof.

Board of Com'rs of Okla. v. De Armond, Stenographer

55 Okla. 618 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1916

Her claim was rejected by the board of county commissioners, from whose action she appealed to the district court. … The county stenographer shall receive as full compensation such salary as may be fixed and allowed by the board of county commissioners, to be paid monthly out of the county treasury, limited as follows: * * * And in counties

Harper County Excise Board v. Phillips Pipe Line Co.

192 Okla. 700 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 3, 1943

This is an appeal by the Harper county, Okla., excise board, plaintiff in error, from an order of the Court of Tax Review entered on the 23rd day of December, 1942. … Co., Jasper Sipes Co. v.

Board of Com'rs of Noble County v. Niemann

182 Okla. 497 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1938

As said in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. … In this connection we are cited to the case of Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County v.

Board of Cty. Commissioners of Grant Cty. v. Ridings

100 Okla. 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1924

Board of County Commissioners of Garvin County, 66 Okla. 75 . 167 Pac. 227 ; Whittinghill v. Board of Commissioners of Woodward County, 68 Okla. 320 , 174 Pac. 489 ; Anderson v. … Board of County Commissioners of Washita County v. Brett, 32 Okla. 853 , 124 Pac. 57 ; Board of County Commissioners of Noble County v. Whitney, 73 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 112 .

Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County v. Fink

60 Okla. 67 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1916

Plaintiffs contend, on the authority' of New Jersey v. Wilson, supra, Choate v. Trapp, supra, and English v. … In New Jersey v.

Sebranek v. Board of Com'rs of Garfield County

166 Okla. 295 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1933

Under the provisions of section 1780, Statutes of Oklahoma, 1893, the board of county commissioners was required to keep a book for the entry of all proceedings relating to the establishment or change of roads. … Treas., v. Nelson, 142 Okla. 54 , 285 P. 100 ; Mills v. Glasscock, 26 Okla. 123 , 110 P. 377 . Eor the reasons stated, we find no error in the judgment of the trial court, and that judgment is in all things affirmed.

Hill v. State ex rel. Board of Regents

367 P.3d 524 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 2015

Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 22 , 989 P.2d 448 (setting for the standard of review for sammary judgment). … Juvenal v.

PRICE v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PAWNEE CO.

2016 OK 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 2016

OSCN Found Document:PRICE v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PAWNEE CO. … Town of Morris, supra, 150 P. at 686 . ¶10 Conversely, the Board cites Board of County Commissioners of the County of Seminole v.

Wilson v. Board of County Com'rs of Tillman County

64 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1917

It was so held in Reddick v. … A well-considered case sq.uarely in point is Brown et al. v. Galena Mining & Smelting Co. et al., 32 Kan. 528 , 4 Pac. 1013 .

Adjustment Realty Co. v. Excise Board of Muskogee County

149 Okla. 70 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1931

The same contention was made and denied in Adjustment Realty Co. v. Excise Board of Muskogee County, 141 Okla. 130 , 284 Pac. 27 . … That contention was denied by this court in Adjustment Realty Co. v. Excise Board, supra, on the ground that it was not presented in the petition in error.

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Jefferson County Excise Board

185 Okla. 84 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1939

WELCH, V. C. J. Joint School District No. 65 lies partly in Jefferson county and partly in Carter county, mostly in the latter county. … Its annual budget for operating expenses for the year 1938-89, as originally approved by the excise board of (tarter county, called for a levy of 17 mills.

Board of Com'rs of McIntosh County v. Whitaker

59 Okla. 232 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1916

Zeigler v. Board of County Commissioners, Grant County, 44 Okla. 266 , 144 Pac. 381 ; Orendorff v. Board of County Commissioners of Grant County. 44 Okla. 271 . 144 Pac. 383 ; Huntington et al. v. … Board of County Commissioners of Grant County, 44 Okla. 276 , 144 Pac. 385 ; Russell v. Board of County Commissioners of Grant County, 44 Okla. 301 , 144 Pac. 580 ; Board of County Commissioners of Washita County v.