Case law

McMillan v. District of Columbia Board of Elections

75 F. Supp. 3d 348 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2014

v. 1:14-cv-00939 (BAH) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF Judge Beryl A. … In that case, the plaintiff challenged New York State and New York City Boards of election for removing “the word ‘Damn’ from the [plaintiff’s] party’s name.” McMillan v.

McCarty Farms, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

158 F.3d 1294 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 20, 1998

See, e.g., Union Pacific R.R. v. … We therefore affirm the decision of the Board.

Bynum v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD

96 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 2000

Terry v. National Transportation Safety Board

661 F.2d 253 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 1981

661 F.2d 253 213 U.S.App.D.C. 32 Terry v. National Transportation Safety Board 80-1835 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 7/1/81 1 Transp. Safety Bd. AFFIRMED

Drew v. Merit Systems Protection Board

659 F.2d 251 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 1981

659 F.2d 251 212 U.S.App.D.C. 205 Drew v. Merit Systems Protection Board 80-1874 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 6/16/81 1 M.S.P.B. AFFIRMED

Hayes v. National Transportation Safety Board

590 F.2d 356 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 26, 1979

590 F.2d 356 191 U.S.App.D.C. 225 Hayes v. National Transportation Safety Board No. 77-1759 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 1/26/79 1 N.T.S. Bd. AFFIRMED

Hayes v. National Transportation Safety Board

494 F.2d 1156 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 12, 1974

494 F.2d 1156 161 U.S.App.D.C. 237 Hayes v. National Transportation Safety Board 73-1052 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 3/12/74 1 D.C.D.C. PETITION DENIED

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. National Mediation Board

2 D.C. 124 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1935

I can see no grounds stated in the bill that would justify the Court in setting aside the decision of the Board as arbitrary or capricious or even erroneous. See opinion of Mr. … Justice Gordon in Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, et al., v. *125 Georgia Southern and Florida Railway Company, et al., Equity 54632. The motion to dismiss the bill of complaint should be sustained.

Western Presbyterian Church v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

862 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 1994

See Western Presbyterian Church v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 849 F.Supp. 77 (D.D.C.1994). … In Sherbert v.

Blakey v. Board of Com'rs of District of Columbia

177 A.2d 269 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1962

Section 5(a) of Part V, Traffic & Motor Vehicle Regulations for the District of Columbia, provides: “Notwithstanding any of the other provisions of this order, the Director of Motor Vehicles, after giving notice and opportunity … Snyder v. City and County of Denver, 123 Colo. 222 , 227 P.2d 341, 343 (1951). 4 . Patton v. People, 114 Colo. 534 , 168 P.2d 266 (1946).

Western Maryland Employees' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board

2 D.C. 144 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1935

Thomas v. National Labor Relations Board

213 F.3d 651 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 2000

Co. v. … Tenorio v.

Leach Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

54 F.3d 802 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 12, 1995

The Board’s interpretation of § 10(b), provided it is reasonable, is entitled to judicial deference. See Drug Plastics & Glass Co., Inc. v. … See, e.g., Teamsters Local 42 v.

Bates v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

639 A.2d 607 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1994

Goto v. District of *610 Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra, 423 A.2d at 922; see Simmons v. … See Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 381 A.2d 1372, 1376 (D.C.1977). . As we have noted, Mendelson is the chairman of the affected ANC.

Debruhl v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board

384 A.2d 421 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1978

Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of State of New Mexico, 353 U.S. 232, 238-39 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957). … Richardson v. Belcher, 404 U.S. 78, 84 , 92 S.Ct. 254 , 30 L.Ed.2d 231 (1971). This court has already noted, albeit in dictum, in Richards v.

Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

303 F.2d 395 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 25, 1962

Capital, as the Board said later, was “in extremis”. … The order of the Board is affirmed, and Eastern’s motions for stay and remand are denied. So ordered. . Federal Aviation Act of 1958, 72 Stat. 767 , 49 U.S.C. § 1378 . . International Shoe Co. v.

Bernstein v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

376 A.2d 816 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 1977

We must therefore regard the Board’s interpretation as controlling. Dietrich v. BZA, D.C.App., 320 A.2d 282, 286 (1974); Rose Lees Hardy Home & School Ass’n v. BZA, D.C.App., 324 A.2d 701, 706 (1974). See also Taylor v. … In Besthoff v.

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

130 F.3d 1083 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 1997

(“the Board”) alleging bad faith bargaining by Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Co. … The Board ruled that in order to show fraudulent concealment, IAM had to show an affirmative act of concealment. See Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co., 321 N.L.R.B. at 924 (citing Richards v.

Gilbert v. National Labor Relations Board

56 F.3d 1438 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 1995

Corp. v. … Group v. FERC, 732 F.2d 202, 211 (D.C.Cir.1984)); see also West Coast Media, Inc. v.

Colts v. U.S. Parole Commission

531 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 9, 2008

Nov.8, 1996) (per curiam) (Parole Board properly relied on criminal charge of which appellant had been acquitted); Arias v. … Board of Parole, 759 A.2d 1073, 1075 (D.C.2000) (“Even though the murder charge against Barnes was dropped, it was permissible for the Board [of Parole] to consider, as it did, the facts underlying that charge.”).